The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
In Reciprocity: Responses to Critiques of Indigenous Methodologies
Abstract
This article will examine and respond to significant critiques of Indigenous research methodologies as part of an Indigenous Methodologies in Educational Research course at a midsized public university in the intermountain west. The authors will present their perspectives in response to critiques of Indigenous research methodologies as presented at the American Indigenous Research Association’s annual meeting in October of 2014. This collection of responses is offered in an effort to facilitate an interactive dialogue with scholars who use Indigenous research methodologies applicable to multiple fields of study, support scholarship that is responsive to the needs of Indigenous communities, and ultimately center relevant research design and findings within Indigenous paradigms.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“As Windchief et al. (2017) pointed out, Indigenous research methodologies “consider the relational aspect of research through Indigenous lenses” (p. 533).”
From From Reflection to Resurgence: Co-Researching Through Storymaking and Truthtelling With Urban Indigenous Women (2026) · cites this paper as Windchief et al. (2017)
In the citing paper
“at the same time, we understand Indigenous research methodologies as comprising shared values and ways of being in relation to others (see, for example, Kovach, 2021; Wilson, 2008; Windchief et al., 2017).”
From From Reflection to Resurgence: Co-Researching Through Storymaking and Truthtelling With Urban Indigenous Women (2026) · cites this paper as Windchief et al., 2017
Citations
Cites
Toward a Tribal Critical Race Theory in Education
Brayboy, B. M. J. (2005) · The Urban Review · doi:10.1007/s11256-005-0018-y · Cited by 1,265
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- 10.59962/9780774855440 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1007/978-1-4020-5771-7 · DOI
- 10.1525/jer.2008.3.2.33 · DOI · Paper page
- Battiste M., 2011, Reclaiming Indigenous voice and vision
- Bennett J. M., 2008, Developing intercultural competence and transformation: Theory, research, and application in international education, 13
- 10.1086/670959 · DOI
- Brayboy B. M. J., 2012, Qualitative research: An introduction to methods and designs, 423
- 10.1080/03057925.2012.706453 · DOI
- 10.5204/ijcis.v4i2.62 · DOI
- Castiano J., 2014, Indilinga: African Journal of Indigenous Knowledge Systems, 13, 28
- 10.1080/09518390500298170 · DOI
- Chilisa B., 2012, Indigenous research methodologies
- Creswell J. W., 2013, Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches
- Crosby M., 2002, Academic reading: Reading and writing across the disciplines, 488
- 10.1353/cp.2002.0046 · DOI
- Gone J. P., 2014, Symposium conducted at the annual conference of the American Indigenous Research Association held at the Salish Kootenai College in Pablo, MT
- 10.1080/095183900413296 · DOI
- Grande S., 2004, Red pedagogy: Native American social and political thought
- 10.1037/a0032595 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1353/aiq.2004.0099 · DOI
- Kirkness V. J., 2001, Journal of American Indian Education, 30, 1
- Klug B. J., 2012, Standing together: American Indian education as culturally relevant pedagogy, 71, 10.5771/9781610487870 · DOI
- Klug B. J., 2012, Standing together: American Indian Education as culturally relevant pedagogy, 10.5771/9781610487870 · DOI
- 10.7202/1069060ar · DOI · Paper page
- Kovach M., 2013, Indigenous methodologies
- Lambert L., 2014, Research for Indigenous survival: Indigenous research methodologies in the behavioral sciences
- LaVeaux D., 2009, Pimatisiwin, 7, 1
- 10.1111/j.1745-5871.2007.00443.x · DOI
- 10.7202/1069061ar · DOI
- 10.3102/0013189X030005006 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-1-4020-5771-7 · DOI
- Sium A., 2013, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 2, 1
- Smith L. T., 2013, Decolonizing methodologies: Research and Indigenous peoples
- 10.17763/haer.79.3.n0016675661t3n15 · DOI · Paper page
- Tuck E., 2012, Decolonization: Indigeneity, Education & Society, 1, 1
- United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization, 2014, Teaching and learning: Achieving quality for all
- 10.1046/j.1440-1584.2000.00304.x · DOI
- wa Thiong’o N, 1981, Decolonising the mind: The politics of language in African literatures
- Wilson S., 2001, Canadian Journal of Native Education, 25, 175
- Wilson S., 2008, Research is ceremony: Indigenous research methods
- Woolman D. C., 2001, International Education Journal, 2, 27
- Writer J. H., 2012, Standing together: American Indian education as culturally relevant pedagogy, 55
Cited by
Washington, S. A. (2025) · Educational Administration Quarterly · doi:10.1177/0013161x251314884 · Cited by 5
Boissoneau, A., Cox, R. D., Leveille, A., Morgan, R. K., Pidgeon, M., & Rosso, M. (2026) · AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples · doi:10.1177/11771801261456796
“As Windchief et al. (2017) pointed out, Indigenous research methodologies “consider the relational aspect of research through Indigenous lenses” (p. 533).”
Metadata
- Authors
- Windchief, S., Polacek, C., Munson, M., Ulrich, M., & Cummins, J. D.
- Affiliations
- Montana State University (US)
- Montana State University, Bozeman, USA
- Salish Kootenai College (US)
- New Mexico State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Windchief, Sweeney
- ORCID
- Windchief, Sweeney
- Venue
- Qualitative Inquiry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2017-12-11
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 8
- Pages
- 532-542
- ISSN
- 1077-8004 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7565
- OpenAlex
- W2774334377
- Cited by
- 45
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1
- FWCI
- 1.09
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Qualitative Inquiry (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Health › Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
- Social Sciences › Education › Indigenous and Place-Based Education
- Keywords
- Indigenous research methodologies, reciprocity, Indigenous paradigms, indigenous peoples, research design
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In Reciprocity: Responses to Critiques of Indigenous Methodologies. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1077800417743527
- The paper
- Windchief, S., Polacek, C., Munson, M., Ulrich, M., & Cummins, J. D. (2018). In Reciprocity: Responses to Critiques of Indigenous Methodologies. Qualitative Inquiry. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800417743527
