The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Transcription in Research and Practice: From Standardization of Technique to Interpretive Positionings
Abstract
Transcription is an integral process in the qualitative analysis of language data and is widely employed in basic and applied research across a number of disciplines and in professional practice fields. Yet, methodological and theoretical issues associated with the transcription process have received scant attention in the research literature. In this article, the authors present a cross-disciplinary conceptual review of the place of transcription in qualitative inquiry, in which the nature of transcription and the epistemological assumptions on which it rests are considered. The authors conclude that transcription is theory laden; the choices that researchers make about transcription enact the theories they hold and constrain the interpretations they can draw from their data. Because it has implications for the interpretation of research data and for decision making in practice fields, transcription as a process warrants further investigation.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Using thematic analysis in psychology
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006) · Qualitative Research in Psychology · doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa · Cited by 194,414
Focus group research and “the patient's view”
Lehoux, P., Poland, B., & Daudelin, G. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2006.05.016 · Cited by 278
Analyzing Talk in Qualitative Inquiry: Exploring Possibilities, Problems, and Tensions
Smith, B., & Sparkes, A. C. (2005) · Quest · doi:10.1080/00336297.2005.10491854 · Cited by 83
“Likewise, Lieblich et al. (1998) suggest that there are various benefi ts and strengths of an analysis of the underlying plot and tensions of particular stories. Addressing issue of structure and form is useful and important, they argue, because the formal aspects of structure, as much as the content, “express” or hel…”
BackgroundMethodEgan, H., & Mantzios, M. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00880 · Cited by 43
Muhwezi, W. W., Okello, E. S., Neema, S., & Musisi, S. (2008) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732308320038 · Cited by 29
Shepherd, A., Sanders, C., & Shaw, J. (2017) · BMC Psychiatry · doi:10.1186/s12888-017-1442-8 · Cited by 18
The motives of people who delay retirement: An occupational perspective
Bratun, U., & Zurc, J. (2022) · Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy · doi:10.1080/11038128.2020.1832573 · Cited by 14
The importance of ethics in leading an International Baccalaureate School in China
Gibson, C. (2025) · Management in Education · doi:10.1177/08920206241260958 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Lapadat, J. C., & Lindsay, A. C.
- Venue
- Qualitative Inquiry
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1999-03
- Volume
- 5
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 64-86
- ISSN
- 1077-8004 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7565
- OpenAlex
- W2138502971
- Cited by
- 584
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 19.82
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.