Cited by 57Intimate Partner and Family ViolenceElder Abuse and NeglectSexual Assault and Victimization Studies

The Response of Mental Health Services to Domestic Violence: A Qualitative Study of Service Users’ and Professionals’ Experiences

Trevillion, Kylee, Howard, Louise M., Morgan, Craig, Feder, Gene, Woodall, Anna, Rose, Diana·2012·Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association

Abstract

PURPOSE: Despite numerous policies advocating for routine enquiry of abuse by mental health professionals, it is not known if such enquiry is acceptable to service users and clinicians. Furthermore, limited evidence exists on clinicians’ response to domestic violence. This study aims to explore the acceptability of routine enquiry and experiences of responding to domestic violence from service user and professional perspectives. METHODS: A qualitative study design was used to conduct individual interviews with a purposive sample of community mental health service users ( n = 24) and professionals ( n = 25). Thematic analysis was employed to establish superordinate and subordinate themes, which were transformed into conceptual maps. RESULTS: All service users considered routine enquiry about domestic violence in mental health settings to be acceptable but a small minority of professionals did not. Service users described positive experiences of help seeking, including receiving acknowledgement for the abuse and support for their multiple needs, and negative experiences, including nonvalidating responses from clinicians following disclosure, discrimination, and an absence of support from services. Main themes for professionals included difficulties in assessment and management of domestic violence, reporting requirements, and unclear referral pathways. CONCLUSIONS: To respond to the needs of mental health service users experiencing domestic violence, services need to articulate a clear care and referral pathway.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1078390312459747

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Trevillion, K., Howard, L. M., Morgan, C., Feder, G., Woodall, A., & Rose, D.
Affiliations
  • King's College London (GB)
  • University of Bristol (GB)
Venue
Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association
Published
2012-09-17
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
326-336
ISSN
  • 1078-3903 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-5725
OpenAlex
W2123351028
Cited by
57
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 9 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the American Psychiatric Nurses Association (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute for Health and Care Research (PB-PG-0906-11026)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Intimate Partner and Family Violence
  • Social Sciences › Demography › Elder Abuse and Neglect
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies
Keywords
domestic violence, mental health services, clinician response, help-seeking, disclosure, discrimination, referral pathways, reporting requirements, community mental health
MeSH terms
Adult, Attitude of Health Personnel, Community Mental Health Services, Female, United Kingdom, Health Personnel, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Patient Satisfaction, Domestic Violence, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review