Cited by 24Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingSexuality, Behavior, and TechnologyCrime, Deviance, and Social Control

Identifying the coping strategies of nonoffending pedophilic and hebephilic individuals from their online forum posts

Open access
Jones, Sarah J., Ó Ciardha, Caoilte, Elliott, Ian A.·2021·Sexual Abuse

Abstract

Individuals who identify as pedophilic or hebephilic, and who do not offend, are increasingly visible in online discourse and as a focus of research. Developing knowledge about this population will offer insights into their psychological needs and, potentially, into the mechanisms and strategies individuals use to live offense-free lives. This study examined coping strategies among members of an online forum supporting pedohebephilic individuals who do not wish to offend. Forum users’ posts were analyzed using thematic analysis. Eleven themes emerged, which were classifiable into three superordinate themes around (a) the acceptance of pedophilia, (b) strategies to stay safe, and (c) dealing with sexual arousal. These themes offer insight into the varying strategies used by these individuals to cope with stress and/or to remain offense-free. Understanding whether these strategies are adaptive or maladaptive may help develop better support services for those who have not offended and may inform prevention efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1079063220965953

Cites

57 of 57 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • They might not show their actual behavior due to lack of trust, social desirability, and fear of losing anonymity.

    “They might not show their actual behavior due to lack of trust, social desirability, and fear of losing anonymity [154].”
  • From the psychological perspective, one of the critical limitations of anonymous studies of pedophiles and the predatory problem is their reliance on self-report for explaining their sexual interest.

    “From the psychological perspective, one of the critical limitations of anonymous studies of pedophiles and the predatory problem is their reliance on self-report for explaining their sexual interest [154].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. Freimond C. M. (2013). Navigating the stigma of pedophilia: The experiences of nine minor-attracted men in Canada [Master thesis, Simon Fraser University].
  2. Hanson R. K. Harris A. J. Scott T. L. Helmus L. (2007). Assessing the risk of sexual offenders on community supervision: The Dynamic Supervision Project (Vol. 5, No. 6). Public Safety Canada.
  3. Hoffmann H. (2007). The role of classical conditioning in sexual arousal. In Janssen E. (Ed.), The psychophysiology of sex (pp. 166– 184). Indiana University Press.
  4. Mitchell R. C. (2014). Potential dynamic protective factors for sex offending: A mixed methods analysis of the decision not to act among men sexually attracted to children [Master thesis, Towson University Institutional Repository].
  5. Raven R. Geraerts E. Smeets G. (2014). Executive functioning in non-offending pedophiles [Master thesis, Erasmus University Rotterdam]. https://scholar.google.co.uk/scholar?hl=en&q=Executive+functioning+in+non-offending+pedophiles+&btnG=&as_sdt=1%2C5&as_sdtp=
  6. Theaker E. A. (2015). Reframing the non-offending pedophile to combat child sexual abuse: A content analysis of public response to Luke Malone’s “Help Wanted” [Doctoral dissertation, University of Washington Bothell].

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jones, S. J., Ó Ciardha, C., & Elliott, I. A.
Affiliations
  • University of Kent (GB)
  • University of Kent, Canterbury, UK
  • Ministry of Justice (GB)
Venue
Sexual Abuse
Published
2020-10-21
Volume
33
Issue
7
Pages
793-815
ISSN
  • 1079-0632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-286X
OpenAlex
W3093763970
Cited by
24
References
57
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
1.00
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Sexual Abuse (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/S018964/1)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Crime, Deviance, and Social Control
Keywords
coping strategies, online forums, sexual arousal, psychological needs, support services, prevention
MeSH terms
Adaptation, Psychological, Humans, Pedophilia

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review