Cited by 147Patient-Provider Communication in HealthcareHealth Literacy and Information AccessibilityPatient Satisfaction in Healthcare

How information about other people's personal experiences can help with healthcare decision-making: A qualitative study

Entwistle, Vikki Ann, France, Emma F., Wyke, Sally, Jepson, Ruth, Hunt, Kate, Ziebland, Sue, Thompson, Andrew·2011·Patient Education and Counseling

Abstract

Objective To investigate people's views of using 'general facts' and information about other people's 'personal experiences' for health-related decision-making.Methods Sixty-two people, who between them had experience of five different focal health issues, participated in 12 focus groups and 9 interviews. Exploration of uses of the two types of information was supported by discussion of illustrative excerpts.Results There was less discussion of 'general facts'; participants thought it obvious that good decisions required these. Participants reported having used 'personal experiences' information to: recognise decisions that needed consideration; identify options; appraise options and make selections (including by developing and reflecting on their reasoning about possible choices); and support coping strategies. Their inclination to use 'personal experiences' information was apparently moderated by assessments of personal relevance, the motives of information providers and the 'balance' of experiences presented.Conclusion People can use 'personal experiences' information in various ways to support their decision-making, and exercise some discrimination as they do.Practice implications 'Personal experiences' information may help people in a number of ways in relation to decision-making. However, 'personal experiences' information does not replace the need for 'general facts' and care should be taken when it is used in resources for patients.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.pec.2011.05.014

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Qualitative data suggest that users find personal experiences helpful in reaching decisions, but there are less data available about whether and how such narratives impact emotional or clinical outcomes.

    “Qualitative data suggest that users find such “personal experiences” helpful in reaching decisions [55], but there are less data available about whether and how such narratives impact emotional or clinical outcomes [56].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Entwistle, V. A., France, E. F., Wyke, S., Jepson, R., Hunt, K., Ziebland, S., & Thompson, A.
Affiliations
  • University of Dundee (GB)
  • University of Stirling (GB)
  • MRC/CSO Social and Public Health Sciences Unit (GB)
  • University of Edinburgh (GB)
Corresponding author
Entwistle, Vikki Ann
Venue
Patient Education and Counseling
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-12
Volume
85
Issue
3
Pages
e291-e298
ISSN
0738-3991 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2072682434
Cited by
147
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 4
FWCI
15.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Patient Education and Counseling (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Discovery Research Portal (University of Dundee) (submittedVersion)
  • Stirling Online Research Repository (University of Stirling) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient-Provider Communication in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Literacy and Information Accessibility
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Patient Satisfaction in Healthcare
Keywords
healthcare decision-making, patient decision support, patient information resources, personal relevance, coping strategies, patient perspectives
MeSH terms
Decision Making, Female, United Kingdom, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Patient Participation, Focus Groups, Qualitative Research, Consumer Health Information

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review