The DOI matches its Crossref record; 83 of the 84 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Business Models for Sustainability From a System Dynamics Perspective
Abstract
To achieve sustainability, a firm has to transform its entire business logic. A business model for sustainability (BMfS) aims at creating value for various stakeholders and the natural environment. This article advances the current understanding of the basic functioning of BMfS by applying a systems perspective. Our BMfS understanding incorporates the natural environment as an essential element, but does not deal with sustainability from a broad perspective. The core logic of a BMfS is built upon the creation of a reinforcing feedback loop between the created value to the customers, the value captured by the firm, and the value to the natural environment. Consequently, we develop a graphical model based on system dynamics notation. First, we conceptualize the basic feedback loops. Then, we propose partial models for the firm, natural environment, entrepreneur/manager, and customer, and then integrate these partial models within a systemic, multilevel model. Finally, we generate propositions that combine insights from the model and extant literature.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Additionally, transport-related studies have employed ML and DSS with ANN, DT, NC, FL, SVM, LR, and time series models (e.g., Ref. [173,174]).”
From Smarter eco-cities and their leading-edge artificial intelligence of things solutions for environmental sustainability: A comprehensive systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [173]
Citations
Cites
Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation
Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393553 · Cited by 35,728
The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits
Friedman, M. (2007) · Corporate Ethics and Corporate Governance · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-70818-6_14 · Cited by 11,529
(2000) · University of Maribor digital library (University of Maribor) · Cited by 9,354
Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business
(1999) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.36-3997 · Cited by 9,023
New Environmental Theories: Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior
Stern, P. C. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00175 · Cited by 8,682
A literature and practice review to develop sustainable business model archetypes
Bocken, N. M. P., Short, S. W., Rana, P., & Evans, S. (2014) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.11.039 · Cited by 4,366
The Limits to Growth: A report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J., & Behrens, W. W. (1972) · doi:10.1349/ddlp.1 · Cited by 4,268
WHY COMPANIES GO GREEN: A MODEL OF ECOLOGICAL RESPONSIVENESS.
Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.2307/1556363 · Cited by 4,020
Corporate social responsibility and access to finance
Cheng, B., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014) · Strategic Management Journal · doi:10.1002/smj.2131 · Cited by 3,896
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. (2010) · IRIS · Cited by 2,586
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Abdelkafi N., 2013, Presented at 13th Annual Conference of the European Academy of Management (EURAM)
- Blaga S., 2013, Review of Economic Studies and Research Virgil Madgearu, 1, 5
- Breuer H., 2014, Proceedings of XXV ISPIM Conference—Innovation for sustainable economy and society, 8
- Forrester J. W., 1961, Industrial dynamics
- Lüdeke-Freund F., 2010, Proceedings of ERSCP-EMSU Conference 2010—Knowledge collaboration and learning for sustainable innovation
- Osterwalder A. (2004). The business model ontology—A proposition in a design science approach (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Université de Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
- Senge P., 2007, MIT Sloan Management Review, 48, 44
- Vilimek R., 2014, Driver acceptance of new technology: Theory, measurement and optimization, 169
- Wagner M., 2001, A review of empirical studies concerning the relationship between environmental and economic performance of firms: What does the evidence tell us?
- Wagner M., 2003, An analysis of the relationship between environmental and economic performance at the firm level and the influence of corporate environmental strategy choice
- Wells P., 2004, IIMB Management Review, 16, 15
- Wirtz B., 2011, Business model management. Design, instruments, success factors
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Sustainable business model innovation: A review
Geissdoerfer, M., Vladimirova, D., & Evans, S. (2018) · Journal of Cleaner Production · doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.06.240 · Cited by 1,976
Designing the Business Models for Circular Economy—Towards the Conceptual Framework
Lewandowski, M. (2016) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su8010043 · Cited by 1,890
A Critical Assessment of Business Model Research
Massa, L., Tucci, C. L., & Afuah, A. N. (2017) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2014.0072 · Cited by 1,587
Evans, S., Vladimirova, D., Holgado, M., Van Fossen, K., Yang, M., Silva, E. A., & Barlow, C. Y. (2017) · Business Strategy and the Environment · doi:10.1002/bse.1939 · Cited by 1,370
Artificial intelligence for sustainability: Challenges, opportunities, and a research agenda
Nishant, R., Kennedy, M., & Corbett, J. (2020) · International Journal of Information Management · doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102104 · Cited by 1,203
Metadata
- Authors
- Abdelkafi, N., & Täuscher, K.
- Affiliations
- Fraunhofer Center for International Management and Knowledge Economy (DE)
- Business Model Engineering and Innovation, Fraunhofer MOEZ, Leipzig, Germany
- Corresponding author
- Abdelkafi, Nizar
- ORCID
- Abdelkafi, Nizar
- Venue
- Organization & Environment
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-07-02
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 74-96
- ISSN
- 1086-0266 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7417
- OpenAlex
- W2281331439
- Cited by
- 443
- References
- 84
- Citations by year
- 2026: 28 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 50 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 54 · 2020: 61 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 6
- FWCI
- 68.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organization & Environment (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
- Fraunhofer-Publica (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Sustainable Supply Chain Management
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Sustainability and Innovation in Business
- Keywords
- business model transformation, reinforcing feedback loops, value creation, stakeholder value, natural environment, system dynamics modeling, multilevel modeling, firm-environment interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review