Cited by 923Identity, Memory, and TherapySocial Representations and IdentityCultural Differences and Values

Narrative and the Cultural Psychology of Identity

Hammack, Phillip L.·2008·Personality and Social Psychology Review

Abstract

This article presents a tripartite model of identity that integrates cognitive, social, and cultural levels of analysis in a multimethod framework. With a focus on content, structure, and process, identity is defined as ideology cognized through the individual engagement with discourse, made manifest in a personal narrative constructed and reconstructed across the life course, and scripted in and through social interaction and social practice. This approach to the study of identity challenges personality and social psychologists to consider a cultural psychology framework that focuses on the relationship between master narratives and personal narratives of identity, recognizes the value of a developmental perspective, and uses ethnographic and idiographic methods. Research in personality and social psychology that either explicitly or implicitly relies on the model is reviewed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1088868308316892

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Research on the cultural shaping of narrative identity reveals important individual differences in how marginalized groups navigate identity development, a process inextricably tied to social/cultural factors that often reflect inequities in power, privilege, and social status.

    “Research on the cultural shaping of narrative identity reveals important individual differences in how marginalized groups navigate identity development, revealing how this process is inextricably tied to social/cultural factors that often reflect inequities in power, privilege, and social status (Hammack, 2008).”

    From Self and identity in personality psychology (2021) · cites this paper as Hammack, 2008

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hammack, P. L.
Affiliations
University of California, Santa Cruz (US)
Corresponding author
Hammack, Phillip L.
Venue
Personality and Social Psychology Review
Published
2008-08
Volume
12
Issue
3
Pages
222-247
ISSN
  • 1088-8683 (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-7957
OpenAlex
W2101232229
Cited by
923
References
17
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 61 · 2024: 79 · 2023: 57 · 2022: 69 · 2021: 60 · 2020: 93 · 2019: 61 · 2018: 69 · 2017: 57 · 2016: 27 · 2015: 51 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 30
FWCI
45.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Personality and Social Psychology Review (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Identity, Memory, and Therapy
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Representations and Identity
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
identity, personal narrative, metanarrative, cultural psychology, ideology, discourse, life course, social interaction, social practices, identity construction, ethnographic methods
MeSH terms
Anthropology, Cultural, Conflict, Psychological, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Humans, Israel, Jews, Social Identification, Social Values, Stereotyping, Cultural Diversity, Arabs, Narration

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review