Cited by 43Behavioral Health and InterventionsMedia Influence and HealthPublic Health Policies and Education

Capitalizing on opportunities to refine health behavior theories

Rothman, Alexander J.·2009·Health Education & Behavior

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1090198109340514

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rothman, A. J.
Affiliations
University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Rothman, Alexander J.
Venue
Health Education & Behavior
Published
2009-10
Volume
36
Issue
5_suppl
Pages
150S-155S
ISSN
  • 1090-1981 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-6127
OpenAlex
W2000819983
Cited by
43
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 13 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
3.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Health Education & Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
U.S. Public Health Service (HHSN261200900383P)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Media Influence and Health
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Public Health Policies and Education
Keywords
health behavior theory, theory refinement, health behavior change, theory development
MeSH terms
Humans, Models, Theoretical, Health Behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review