Cited by 58Health Policy Implementation ScienceHealth Sciences Research and EducationSubstance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes

Validation of the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) in Substance use Disorder Treatment Organizations

Open access
Aarons, Gregory A., Ehrhart, Mark G., Torres, Elisa M., Finn, Natalie K., Roesch, Scott C.·2016·Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment

Abstract

There have been recent calls for pragmatic measures to assess factors that influence evidence-based practice (EBP) implementation processes and outcomes. The Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS) is a brief and efficient measure that can be used for research or organizational development purposes to assess leader behaviors and actions that actively support effective EBP implementation. The ILS was developed and validated in mental health settings. This study validates the ILS factor structure with providers in alcohol and other drug (AOD) use treatment agencies. Participants were 323 service providers working in 72 workgroups from three AOD use treatment agencies. Confirmatory factor analyses and reliability analyses were conducted to examine the psychometric properties of the ILS. Convergent and discriminant validity were also assessed. Confirmatory factor analyses demonstrated good fit to the hypothesized first and second order factor structure. Internal consistency reliability was excellent. Convergent and discriminant validity was supported. The ILS psychometric characteristics, reliability, and validity were supported in AOD use treatment agencies. The ILS is a brief and pragmatic measure that can be used for research and practice to assess leadership for EBP implementation in AOD use treatment agencies.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jsat.2016.05.004

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The ILS has been successfully validated in child welfare, substance use treatment, and acute care.

    “Subsequent studies have begun this work, including successful validation of the instrument in child welfare [30], substance use treatment [31], and acute care [32];”
  • All values on the original subscales (proactive, knowledgeable, supportive, perseverant) were consistently higher than the original ILS development sample in outpatient mental health and validations in substance use treatment settings and acute care, but generally comparable to a validation study in child welfare.

    “All values on the original subscales (i.e., proactive, knowledgeable, supportive, perseverant) were consistently higher than the original ILS development sample in outpatient mental health [26] and validations in substance use treatment settings [31] and acute care [32], but generally comparable to a validation study in child welfare [30].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 39 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aarons, G. A., Ehrhart, M. G., Torres, E. M., Finn, N. K., & Roesch, S. C.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • San Diego State University (US)
Corresponding author
  • Aarons, Gregory A.
  • Ehrhart, Mark G.
  • Torres, Elisa M.
  • Roesch, Scott C.
Venue
Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-09
Volume
68
Pages
31-35
ISSN
0740-5472 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2354437841
Cited by
57
References
39
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4
FWCI
6.63
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Open Scholarship Institutional Repository (Washington University in St. Louis) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R21MH098124, R21MH082731, R01MH072961, R01MH092950)
  • National Institute on Drug Abuse (R01DA038466)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Sciences Research and Education
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
Keywords
implementation leadership, evidence-based practice implementation, scale validation, psychometric properties, factor structure, service providers, organizational development
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Alcoholism, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Health Personnel, Humans, Leadership, Male, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Reproducibility of Results, Substance-Related Disorders, Evidence-Based Practice, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review