The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Primer on Internet Organizational Surveys
Abstract
With so many individuals linked to the Internet and so many possible ways to reach them, the debate for organizational scholars is no longer over whether Internet self-administered surveys are possible but rather over the comparative understanding and the relative advantages and disadvantages of these surveys. Because relevant research has generally been fragmented and narrow in scope, making comparisons difficult, the authors review and assess the research on Internet selfadministered surveying modalities of electronic mail and the World Wide Web. Then, they provide recommendations that address problematic and controversial aspects of these modalities, including ways to increase the representativeness of samples, construct sampling frames, increase response rates, and manage anonymity and confidentiality.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The theory of planned behavior
Ajzen, I. (1991) · Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes · doi:10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-t · Cited by 90,587
Information richness. A new approach to managerial behavior and organization design
Daft, R. L., & Lengel, R. H. (1983) · doi:10.21236/ada128980 · Cited by 2,263 · cited 2×
“According to the information richness theory (Daft & Lengel, 1984; Daft, Lengel, & Trevino, 1987), media richness involves the processing of rich information to reduce equivocality and share meaning, and it varies with four characteristics of a communication medium (Daft & Lengel, 1984): (a)…”
BackgroundThe Design and Administration of Mail Surveys
Dillman, D. A. (1991) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.so.17.080191.001301 · Cited by 1,311
Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-Analysis
Church, A. H. (1993) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1086/269355 · Cited by 705
World-Wide Web survey research: Benefits, potential problems, and solutions
Schmidt, W. C. (1997) · Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers · doi:10.3758/bf03204826 · Cited by 620
Cited by
Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research
Baruch, Y., & Holtom, B. C. (2008) · Human Relations · doi:10.1177/0018726708094863 · Cited by 3,462
Casler, K., Bickel, L., & Hackett, E. (2013) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2013.05.009 · Cited by 1,662
The Impact of Extent of Telecommuting on Job Satisfaction: Resolving Inconsistent Findings
Golden, T. D., & Veiga, J. F. (2005) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206304271768 · Cited by 515
Self-citationEmployee engagement: an examination of antecedent and outcome variables
Shuck, B., Reio, T. G., & Rocco, T. S. (2011) · Human Resource Development International · doi:10.1080/13678868.2011.601587 · Cited by 436
The role of consumer innovativeness and perceived risk in online banking usage
Aldás‐Manzano, J., Lassala‐Navarré, C., Ruiz‐Mafé, C., & Sanz‐Blas, S. (2009) · International Journal of Bank Marketing · doi:10.1108/02652320910928245 · Cited by 364
Metadata
- Authors
- Simsek, Z., & Veiga, J. F.
- Venue
- Organizational Research Methods
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2001-07
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 218-235
- ISSN
- 1094-4281 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7425
- OpenAlex
- W2119643705
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 20.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Primer on Internet Organizational Surveys. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/109442810143003
- The paper
- Simsek, Z., & Veiga, J. F. (2001). A Primer on Internet Organizational Surveys. Organizational Research Methods. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810143003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
