Cited by 435Qualitative Comparative Analysis ResearchBusiness and Management StudiesComputational and Text Analysis Methods

Chapter 3 The Two QCAs: From a Small-N to a Large-N Set Theoretic Approach

Greckhamer, Thomas, Misangyi, Vilmos F., Fiss, Peer C.·2013·Research in the Sociology of Organizations

Abstract

Although QCA was originally developed specifically for small-N settings, recent studies have shown its potential for large-N organization studies. In this chapter, we provide guidance to prospective researchers with the goal of opening up QCA’s potential for widespread use in organization studies involving large-N settings, both as an alternative and as a complement to conventional regression analyses. We compare small-N and large-N QCA with respect to theoretical assumptions and objectives, processes and decisions involved in building the causal model, selecting the sample, as well as analyzing the data and interpreting the results. Finally, we discuss the prospects for large-N configurational analysis in organization studies and related fields going forward.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1108/s0733-558x(2013)0000038007

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Greckhamer, T., Misangyi, V. F., & Fiss, P. C.
Venue
Research in the Sociology of Organizations
Published
2013-01
Pages
49-75
ISSN
0733-558X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2506533400
Cited by
435
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 59 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 50 · 2023: 53 · 2022: 34 · 2021: 46 · 2020: 40 · 2019: 27 · 2018: 22 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 9 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2
FWCI
48.54
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Research in the sociology of organizations (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Comparative Analysis Research
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Business and Management Studies
  • Social Sciences › General Social Sciences › Computational and Text Analysis Methods
Keywords
qualitative comparative analysis, configurational analysis, sample selection, organization studies

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review