The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Bayesian Network Model of the Consumer Complaint Process
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to present a Bayesian network model of the consumer complaint process. The outputs of the Bayesian model—conditional probabilities—provide much insight into the determinants and subsequent behavioral outcomes (e.g., full repatronage, limited repatronage, and exit; negative word-of-mouth behavior [WOM], no WOM, and positive WOM) of the complaint process. By distinguishing between (a) noncomplainers, (b) satisfied complainants, and (c) dissatisfied complainants, the model provides a rich, descriptive overview of the broader complaining behavior process. The model revealed several interesting findings; for example, the probability that a noncomplainer or a dissatisfied complainant will completely exit is quite low. The probabilities that a satisfied complainant will intend to fully repatronize the retailer and engage in positive word of mouth, on the other hand, are quite high. The advantages and limitations of Bayesian network models are discussed vis-à-vis structural equations models and partial least squares.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Blodgett and Anderson (2000) show that post-failure positive WOM tends to result from effective recovery efforts; it does not occur when customers do not complain and, subsequently, do not initiate failure reparation.”
From A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses (2011) · cites this paper as Blodgett and Anderson 2000
In the citing paper
“Although this may hold true for the mere valence of a consumer's reference, the likelihood of both WOM types is not necessarily negatively interdependent: One may (be likely to) tell positive as well as negative things about a company (Blodgett and Anderson 2000).”
From A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses (2011) · cites this paper as Blodgett and Anderson 2000
Citations
Cites
The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice
Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988) · Critical Issues in Social Justice · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2115-4 · Cited by 6,585
Defensive Marketing Strategy by Customer Complaint Management: A Theoretical Analysis
Fornell, C., & Wernerfelt, B. (1987) · Journal of Marketing Research · doi:10.1177/002224378702400401 · Cited by 1,395
Research works printed but not linked: 42
- Anderberg, M. R., 1973, Cluster Analysis for Applications
- Bearden, William O., 1984, Advances in Consumer Research, 490
- Bies, Robert J., 1986, Research in Organizational Behavior, 289
- 10.1007/BF01048016 · DOI
- 10.1016/0022-4359(93)90015-B · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1016/S0022-4359(97)90003-8 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/08876049510094487 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.260 · DOI
- 10.1214/aos/1176349260 · DOI
- Day, Ralph L., 1976, Advances in Consumer Research, 263
- 10.1515/9781503620766 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1086/208978 · DOI
- 10.2307/3151381 · DOI
- 10.3102/10769986004003247 · DOI
- Hart, Christopher W., 1990, Harvard Business Review, 68, 148
- 10.1145/203330.203336 · DOI
- Hirschman, Albert O., 1970, Exit, Voice and Loyalty
- Homans, G. C., 1961, Social Behavior: Its Elementary Forms
- Howard, R. A., 1981, Principles and Applications of Decision Analysis, 719
- 10.2307/1252074 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/0092070394221005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.2307/270722 · DOI
- 10.1007/978-3-642-52512-4 · DOI
- 10.1037/0033-2909.114.1.185 · DOI
- McCollough, Michael A., 1992, Marketing Theory and Applications
- 10.1207/s15327906mbr3102_5 · DOI
- Pearl, Judea, 1988, Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligence Systems
- 10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60566-6 · DOI
- Ramoni, Marco, 1998, Bayesian Knowledge Discoverer
- 10.1086/208946 · DOI
- 10.2307/3203428 · DOI
- 10.1007/BF02722168 · DOI
- Scheines, R., 1994, TETRAD II: User’s Manual and Software
- 10.1287/opre.34.6.871 · DOI
- 10.2307/1251688 · DOI
- Singh, Jagdip, 1990, Journal of Retailing, 66, 57
- 10.1177/109467059800100106 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1214/ss/1177010888 · DOI
- 10.1177/0092070398263001 · DOI
- Tax, Stephen S., 1998, Journal of Marketing, 62, 60, 10.1177/002224299806200205 · DOI · Paper page
- Thibaut, J., 1975, Procedural Justice: A Psychological Analysis
- Wold, Herman, 1980, Mathematical Statistics, 6, 333
Cited by
Sorted by citations
A Meta-Analysis of Organizational Complaint Handling and Customer Responses
Gelbrich, K., & Roschk, H. (2011) · Journal of Service Research · doi:10.1177/1094670510387914 · Cited by 481
Metadata
- Authors
- Blodgett, J. G., & Anderson, R. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Mississippi (US)
- Indiana University (US)
- Venue
- Journal of Service Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2000-05
- Volume
- 2
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 321-338
- ISSN
- 1094-6705 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-7379
- OpenAlex
- W2167817177
- Cited by
- 203
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 11
- FWCI
- 4.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Service Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer Service Quality and Loyalty
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Customer churn and segmentation
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Consumer Behavior and Marketing Influence
- Keywords
- customer complaints, complaint handling, customer exit, word of mouth, customer satisfaction, Bayesian networks, consumer behavior
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Bayesian Network Model of the Consumer Complaint Process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/109467050024002
- The paper
- Blodgett, J. G., & Anderson, R. D. (2000). A Bayesian Network Model of the Consumer Complaint Process. Journal of Service Research. https://doi.org/10.1177/109467050024002