CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 140Culinary Culture and TourismDiverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchNostalgia and Consumer Behavior

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Connections Between Culinary Tourism Experiences and Memory

Stone, Matthew J., Migacz, Steven, Sthapit, Erose·2022·Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research
DOI 10.1177/1096348021994171
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Tourism researchers have identified many factors leading to memorable food tourism (culinary tourism) experiences. This research proposes reasons why food experiences while traveling are especially memorable and proposes avenues for future research on food and memory. The act of travel in addition to the act of eating/drinking and individual attitudes and emotions likely work together to create memories. Travelers agreed with many reasons why food travel experiences are connected with memory. These include sensory connections, emotional connections, social and interpersonal connections, novelty and experimental connections, focus and attention, and reflective connections. These connections may also relate to pretrip expectations. Travelers who identified themselves as motivated to travel for food and drink felt more strongly than other travelers about the reasons that food and drink travel experiences were connected with memory. Suggestions are included for researchers to advance understanding of memorable food tourism experiences.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1096348021994171

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 27 references

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Stone M. J., 2016, 2016 Food travel monitor
  2. Sutton D., 2011, Food, Culture & Society, 14, 462

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–139 of 139

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Stone, M. J., Migacz, S., & Sthapit, E.
Affiliations
  • California State University, Chico (US)
  • Roosevelt University (US)
  • Haaga-Helia University of Applied Sciences (FI)
ORCID
Venue
Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2021-02-22
Volume
46
Issue
4
Pages
797-807
ISSN
  • 0741-5095 (ISSN-L)
  • 1096-3480
  • 1557-7554
DOI
10.1177/1096348021994171
OpenAlex
W3131151609
Cited by
140
References
27
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 37 · 2023: 33 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 5
FWCI
14.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • Journal of Hospitality & Tourism Research (publishedVersion)
  • e-space (Manchester Metropolitan University) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Culinary Culture and Tourism
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Tourism, Leisure and Hospitality Management › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Nostalgia and Consumer Behavior
Keywords
food tourism, memorable tourism experience, memory, sensory experience, emotional connection, social connectedness, novelty, reflective experience

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review