Cited by 167Health Policy Implementation ScienceGlobal Maternal and Child HealthGlobal Health and Surgery

Travelling models and the challenge of pragmatic contexts and practical norms: the case of maternal health

Open access
Olivier de Sardan, Jean-Pierre, Diarra, Aïssa, Moha, Mahaman·2017·Health Research Policy and Systems

Abstract

As in other areas of international development, we are witnessing the proliferation of 'traveling models' developed by international experts and introduced in an almost identical format across numerous countries to improve some aspect of maternal health systems in low- and middle-income countries. These policies and protocols are based on 'miracle mechanisms' that have been taken out of their original context but are believed to be intrinsically effective in light of their operational devices.In reality, standardised interventions are, in Africa and elsewhere, confronted with pragmatic implementation contexts that are always varied and specific, and which lead to drifts, distortions, dismemberments and bypasses. The partogram, focused antenatal care, the prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV or performance-based payment all illustrate these implementation gaps, often caused by the routine behaviour of health personnel who follow practical norms (and a professional culture) that are often distinct from official norms - as is the case with midwives.Experiences in maternal and child health in Africa suggest that an alternative approach would be to start with the daily reality of social and practical norms instead of relying on models, and to promote innovations that emerge from within local health systems.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1186/s12961-017-0213-9

Cites

142 of 142 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 146 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 5

  1. [46]Sabatier P editor. Theories of the Policy Process. Theoretical Lenses on Public Policy 1992 Boulder Westview Press
  2. [84]Health Education and Training Team for Africa. Antenatal Care Module. Chapter 13: Providing Focused Antenatal Care. Ethiopian Health Extension Programme. London: The Open University Press; 2011.
  3. [100]Abbott A Ragin C Becker H What do Cases do? Some Notes on Activity in Sociological Analysis What is a Case? Exploring the Foundations of Social Enquiry 1992 Cambridge Cambridge University Press
  4. [113]De Herdt T, Olivier de Sardan JP. Real Governance and Practical Norms in Sub-Saharan Africa. The Game of the Rules. London: Routledge; 2015.
  5. [116]Diarra A Socio-anthropologie de la Prise en Charge de l’Accouchement au Mali. Anthropology Doctorate thesis 2010 Marseille EHESS

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olivier de Sardan, J.-P., Diarra, A., & Moha, M.
Affiliations
Laboratoire d'Études et de Recherche sur les Dynamiques Sociales et le Développement Local (NE)
Venue
Health Research Policy and Systems
Published
2017-07
Volume
15
Issue
S1
Pages
60-60
ISSN
1478-4505 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2736206036
Cited by
167
References
146
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 20 · 2022: 28 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 30 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 16 · 2017: 6
FWCI
2.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by
Locations
  • Health Research Policy and Systems (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
International Development Research Centre
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health Policy Implementation Science
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Global Maternal and Child Health
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Global Health and Surgery
Keywords
policy transfer, maternal health, implementation gap, practical norms, professional culture, midwives, partograph, focused antenatal care, prevention of mother-to-child transmission of HIV, performance-based pay, low- and middle-income countries, Africa
MeSH terms
Maternal Health, Africa, Community Health Workers, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Maternal Health Services, Midwifery, Pregnancy, Prenatal Care

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review