Cited by 30Allergic Rhinitis and SensitizationFood Allergy and Anaphylaxis ResearchAsthma and respiratory diseases

Anti-Fel d1 immunoglobulin Y antibody-containing egg ingredient lowers allergen levels in cat saliva

Open access
Satyaraj, Ebenezer, Li, Qinghong, Sun, Peichuan, Sherrill, Scott·2019·Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery

Abstract

Objectives: Fel d1 is the major cat allergen, causing IgE reactions in up to 90% of cat-allergic adults. Fel d1 secreted in saliva is spread to the haircoat during grooming. Current management includes attempts to reduce or eliminate exposure to Fel d1. A novel approach to reducing immunologically active Fel d1 (aFel d1) exposure, which involves binding the Fel d1 with an anti-Fel d1-specific polyclonal egg IgY antibody (sIgY), was evaluated. The hypothesis was that saliva from cats fed diets containing this sIgY would show a significant reduction in aFel d1. Methods: Two trials in cats were completed. In trial 1, saliva was collected 0, 1, 3 and 5 h post-feeding during a 2 week baseline and subsequent 6 week treatment period. Trial 2 included a control and treatment group, and saliva was collected once daily. Trial 2 cats were fed the control diet during a 1 week baseline period, and then fed either control or sIgY diet during the 4 week treatment period. Fel d1-specific ELISA was used to measure salivary aFel d1. Data were analysed using repeated-measures ANOVA and a linear mixed-model analysis. Results: Salivary aFel d1 decreased post-treatment in both trials. There were no differences in aFel d1 based on time of collection relative to feeding in trial 1. In trial 2, 82% of treatment group cats showed a decrease in aFel d1 of at least 20% from baseline vs just 38% of control cats. Only one (9%) treatment cat showed an increase in aFel d1 vs 63% of control cats. Conclusions and relevance: Feeding sIgY significantly reduced aFel d1 in the saliva of cats within 3 weeks. Although additional research is needed, these findings show promise for an alternative approach to the management of allergies to cats.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1098612x19861218

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 27

  1. [1]Gronlund H Saame T Gafveline G, et al. The major cat allergen, Fel d 1, in diagnosis and therapy. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2010; 151: 265– 274. 19844127
  2. [2]Ukleja-Sokolowska N Gawronska-Ukleja E Zbikowska-Gotz M, et al. Analysis of feline and canine allergen components in patients sensitized to pets. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol 2016; 12: 16. DOI: 10.1186/s13223-016-0167-4. 27956908 PMC5129236 · DOI
  3. [3]Salo PM Calatroni A Gergen PJ, et al. Allergy-related outcomes in relation to serum IgE: results from the National health and nutrition examination survey 2005–2006. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2011; 127: 1226–1235.e7. DOI: 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.12.1106. PMC3108140 21320720 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [4]Scarlett JM Salman MD New JG, et al. Reasons for relinquishment of companion animals in US animal shelters: selected health and personal issues. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci 1999; 2: 41– 57. 16363961
  5. [5]Weiss E Grammann S Spain CV, et al. Goodbye to a good friend: an exploration of the re-homing of cats and dogs in the US. Open J Anim Sci 2015; 5: 435– 456.
  6. [6]Ichikawa K Isasaki E Baba M, et al. High prevalence of sensitization to cat allergen among Japanese children with asthma, living without cats. Clin Exp Allergy 1999; 29: 754– 761. 10336590
  7. [8]Bjerg A Winberg A Berthold M, et al. A population-based study of animal component sensitization, asthma, and rhinitis in schoolchildren. Pediatr Allergy Immunol 2015; 26: 557– 563. 26059105
  8. [10]Morgenstern JP Griffith IJ Brauer AW, et al. Amino acid sequence of Fel d1, the major allergen of the domestic cat: protein sequence analysis and cDNA cloning. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 1991; 88: 9690– 9694. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.88.21.9690. 1946388 PMC52784 · DOI
  9. [12]Liccardi G D’Amato G Russo M, et al. Focus on cat allergen (Fel d 1): immunological and aerodynamic characteristics, modality of airway sensitization and avoidance strategies. Int Arch Allergy Immunol 2003; 132: 1– 12. 14555853
  10. [13]Duffort OA Carreira J Nitti G, et al. Studies on the biochemical structure of the major cat allergen Felis domesticus 1. Mol Immunol 1991; 28: 301– 309. 1712068
  11. [14]Kristensen AK Schou C Roepstorff P. Determination of isoforms, N-linked glycan structure and disulfide bond linkages of the major cat allergen Fel d1 by a mass spectrometric approach. Biol Chem 1997; 378: 899– 908. 9377487
  12. [15]Custovic A Simpson A Woodcock A. Importance of indoor allergens in the induction of allergy and elicitation of allergic disease. Allergy 1998; 53 48 Suppl: 115– 120. 10096822
  13. [16]Heinrich J Bedada BG Zock JP, et al. Cat allergen level: its determinants and relationship to specific IgE to cat across European centers. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2006; 118: 674– 681. 16950287
  14. [17]Klucka CV Ownby DR Green J, et al. Cat shedding of Fel d1 is not reduced by washings, Allerpet-C spray, or acepromazine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 1995; 95: 1164– 1171. 7797784
  15. [18]Lichtenstein LM Holtzman NA Burnett LS. A quantitative in vitro study of the chromatographic distribution and immunoglobulin characteristics of human blocking antibody. J Immunol 1968; 101: 317– 324. 4174497
  16. [19]Adkinson NF Sobotka AK Lichtenstein LM. Evaluation of the quantity and affinity of human IgG “blocking” antibodies. J Immunol 1979; 122: 965– 972. 312830
  17. [20]Schmitz N Dietmeier K Bauer M, et al. Displaying Fel d1 on virus-like particles prevents reactogenicity despite greatly enhanced immunogenicity: a novel therapy for cat allergy. J Exp Med 2009; 206: 1941– 1955. 19667059 PMC2737174
  18. [21]Uermosi C Beerli R Bauer M, et al. Mechanisms of allergen-specific desensitization. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2010; 126; 375– 383. 20624641
  19. [22]Vega CG Bok M Vlasova AN, et al. IgY antibodies protect against human rotavirus induced diarrhea in the neonatal gnotobiotic piglet disease model. PLoS One 2012; 7: e42788. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0042788. 22880110 PMC3411843 · DOI
  20. [23]Diraviyam T Zhao B Wang Y, et al. Effect of chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY) against diarrhea in domesticated animals: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One 2014; 9: e97716. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0097716. 24846286 PMC4028221 · DOI
  21. [24]Kelly SM Karsh J Marcelo J, et al. Fel d 1 and Fel d 4 levels in cat fur, saliva and urine. J Allergy Clin Immunol 2018; 142: 1990– 1992.e3. 30176277
  22. [25]Bastien BC Gardner G Satyaraj E. Influence of time and phenotype on salivary Fel d1 in domestic shorthair cats. J Feline Med Surg 2019; 21: 867– 874. 31135257 PMC6764004
  23. [28]Didierlaurent A Fogliette MJ Guerin B, et al. Comparative study on cat allergens from fur and saliva. Int Arch Allergy Appl Immunol 1984; 73: 27– 31. 6420349
  24. [29]Cononica GW Baena-Cagnani CE Bousquet J, et al. Recommendations for standardization of clinical trials with allergen specific immunotherapy for respiratory allergy. A statement of a World Allergy Organization (WAO) taskforce. Allergy 2007; 62: 317– 324. 17298350
  25. [30]Coren S. Allergic patients do not comply with doctor’s advice to stop owning pets. BMJ 1997; 314: 517. PMC2126007 9056818
  26. [31]Sanchez J Diez S Cardona R. Pet avoidance in allergy cases: is it possible to implement it? Biomedica 2015; 35: 357– 362. 26849697
  27. [33]Thu HM Myat TW Win MM, et al. Chicken egg yolk antibodies (IgY) for prophylaxis and treatment of rotavirus diarrhea in human and animal neonates: a concise review. Korean J Food Sci An 2017; 37: 1– 9. DOI: 10.5851/kosfa.2017.37.1.1. PMC5355572 28316465 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Satyaraj, E., Li, Q., Sun, P., & Sherrill, S.
Affiliations
Nestlé (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Satyaraj, Ebenezer
Venue
Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery
Published
2019-07-16
Volume
21
Issue
10
Pages
875-881
ISSN
  • 1098-612X (ISSN-L)
  • 1532-2750
OpenAlex
W2957018352
Cited by
30
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Feline Medicine and Surgery (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Nestlé Purina Pet Care
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Allergic Rhinitis and Sensitization
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Immunology and Allergy › Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Asthma and respiratory diseases
Keywords
Fel d 1, cat allergen, polyclonal antibodies, feline allergy, allergen reduction
MeSH terms
Air Pollutants, Allergens, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Cats, Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assay, Glycoproteins, Immunoglobulin E, Immunoglobulins, Saliva

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review