Cited by 40Acne and Rosacea Treatments and EffectsDermatology and Skin DiseasesSkin Protection and Aging

Tolerability of Topical Retinoids: Are There Clinically Meaningful Differences Among Topical Retinoids?

Culp, Leonora, Moradi Tuchayi, Sara, Alinia, Hossein, Feldman, Steven R.·2015·Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery

Abstract

Background: Topical retinoids are first-line treatment options for acne vulgaris. These drugs, however, produce varying degree of cutaneous irritation within the first few weeks of treatment. Objective: Our purpose was to examine differences in tolerability of topical retinoids and assess whether these differences would be clinically meaningful. Methods: A PubMed search was performed for sources on topical retinoids in acne vulgaris treatment. Thirty-four clinical studies were analyzed. Results: Thirteen studies had statistically significant results on tolerability of retinoid based on retinoid, vehicle, concentration, or skin type. All studies classified most of skin reactions as mild-moderate. Large differences in the number of dropouts due to irritation were not identified. Conclusion: Irritation studies did not show a high frequency of clinically significant irritation with topical retinoids. We anticipate that the large variation in patient use of topical retinoids would likely account for more variation in response than differences between drug formulations.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1203475415591117

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Culp, L., Moradi Tuchayi, S., Alinia, H., & Feldman, S. R.
Affiliations
  • Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US)
  • Center for Dermatology Research, Departments of Dermatology, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, USA
Venue
Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery
Published
2015-06-18
Volume
19
Issue
6
Pages
530-538
ISSN
  • 1203-4754 (ISSN-L)
  • 1615-7109
OpenAlex
W1828582648
Cited by
40
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 8 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Acne and Rosacea Treatments and Effects
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Skin Protection and Aging
Keywords
topical retinoids, acne, drug tolerability, skin irritation, adverse skin reactions, treatment discontinuation, skin type
MeSH terms
Acne Vulgaris, Administration, Cutaneous, Dermatologic Agents, Humans, Retinoids

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review