The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
#MeToo and the promise and pitfalls of challenging rape culture through digital feminist activism
Open accessAbstract
(Opening paragraph) On 24th October 2017, the #MeToo hashtag began trending on Twitter. Although the phrase was initiated by African American women’s rights activists Tarana Burke in 2006, it gained widespread attention when actress Alyssa Milano used it as a Twitter hashtag in response to allegations of sexual assault by Hollywood producer Harvey Weinstein. Through the #MeToo hashtag, Milano encouraged members of the public to join in to showcase the magnitude of the problem of sexual violence. Capturing both public and media attention, the hashtag was used 12 million times in the first 24 hours alone (CBS, 2017).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crime, Justice and Social Media
Salter, M. (2016) · doi:10.4324/9781315687742 · Cited by 63
Cited by
On the Dangers of Stochastic Parrots: Can Language Models Be Too Big? 🦜
Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency · doi:10.1145/3442188.3445922 · Cited by 6,988
BOR, A., & PETERSEN, M. B. (2022) · American Political Science Review · doi:10.1017/s0003055421000885 · Cited by 128
Mapping #MeToo: A synthesis review of digital feminist research across social media platforms
Quan-Haase, A., Mendes, K., Ho, D., Lake, O., Nau, C., & Pieber, D. (2021) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820984457 · Cited by 94
Self-citationMainstreaming the Blackpill: Understanding the Incel Community on TikTok
Solea, A. I., & Sugiura, L. (2023) · European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research · doi:10.1007/s10610-023-09559-5 · Cited by 105
Feminist activism in digital space: Postfeminist contradictions in #WhyIStayed
Linabary, J. R., Corple, D. J., & Cooky, C. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444819884635 · Cited by 66
Feminist responses to COVID-19 in China through the lens of affect
Zhang, J. (2023) · Feminist Media Studies · doi:10.1080/14680777.2022.2041694 · Cited by 22
PettyJohn, M. E., Anderson, G., & McCauley, H. L. (2022) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/08862605211055079 · Cited by 18
The Language of Social Inequality
Augoustinos, M., & Callaghan, P. (2019) · The Social Psychology of Inequality · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-28856-3_20 · Cited by 15
Image-based Abuse: Debate and Reflections on the “Iveco Case” in Spain on Twitter
Idoiaga Mondragon, N., Santamaria, M. D., Txertudi, M. B., & Saez, I. A. (2022) · Journal of Interpersonal Violence · doi:10.1177/0886260520967143 · Cited by 11
Metadata
- Authors
- Mendes, K., Ringrose, J., & Keller, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Women's Studies
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-04-29
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-246
- ISSN
- 1350-5068 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7420
- OpenAlex
- W2798262146
- Cited by
- 772
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 161.40
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
