The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Technological and Structural Characteristics, Student Learning and Satisfaction with Web-Based Courses: An Exploratory Study of Two On-Line MBA Programs
Abstract
This article compares courses in two web-based MBA programs on student perceptions of learning and satisfaction. The primary difference between the programs is that one conducts the courses entirely on-line while the other conducts the courses primarily on-line combined with one or two on-site class meetings. The results of the study showed that larger class sizes were negatively associated with learning and course satisfaction while the perceived flexibility of the delivery medium was significantly associated with perceived learning and satisfaction. The results also indicate that more experienced on-line students were more satisfied with their course delivery medium. These findings have significant implications for the role of web-based programs in a business school's strategy. They suggest that that rather than using these courses as a means to drive down the cost of delivering education, business schools may need to identify reasons for which they can charge premiums for them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology
Davis, F. D. (1989) · MIS Quarterly · doi:10.2307/249008 · Cited by 68,483
Cited by
Sun, P.-C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y.-Y., & Yeh, D. (2008) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2006.11.007 · Cited by 2,726
How does desktop virtual reality enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach
Ai-Lim Lee, E., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2010.06.006 · Cited by 580
A review of predictive factors of student success in and satisfaction with online learning
Kauffman, H. (2015) · Research in Learning Technology · doi:10.3402/rlt.v23.26507 · Cited by 552
Understanding the effect of e-learning on individual performance: The role of digital literacy
Mohammadyari, S., & Singh, H. (2015) · Computers & Education · doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2014.10.025 · Cited by 496
Understanding user perception toward artificial intelligence (AI) enabled e-learning
Kashive, N., Powale, L., & Kashive, K. (2020) · The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology · doi:10.1108/ijilt-05-2020-0090 · Cited by 181
Metadata
- Authors
- Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R.
- Venue
- Management Learning
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2002-09
- Volume
- 33
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 331-347
- ISSN
- 1350-5076 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7307
- OpenAlex
- W1966558677
- Cited by
- 387
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 40.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Technological and Structural Characteristics, Student Learning and Satisfaction with Web-Based Courses: An Exploratory Study of Two On-Line MBA Programs. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1350507602333003
- The paper
- Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and Structural Characteristics, Student Learning and Satisfaction with Web-Based Courses: An Exploratory Study of Two On-Line MBA Programs. Management Learning. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507602333003
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.