The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Therapeutic efficacy of plasma exchange in NMO-IgG-positive patients with neuromyelitis optica
Abstract
Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is an inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS) with a poor prognosis in terms of the optic-spinal function. Recently, a serum autoantibody (NMO-IgG) binding to the blood–brain barrier region was detected exclusively in patients with NMO and its high risk group. We treated six NMO-IgG-positive patients (all female; age 21–67 years old, median 41; three with optic neuritis and three with myelitis) who were unresponsive to high-dose intravenous methylprednisolone (HIMP), with plasma exchange (PE) (three to five exchanges, 2–3 L each). Three of the patients(one with optic neuritis and two with myelitis) showed definite functional improvement following PE. The clinical improvement started to appear after one or two exchanges, while there was little or no improvement in the other three patients. Such quick clinical responses to PE suggest a pathogenetic role of humoral immune factors in NMO, although delayed responses to the corticosteroid therapy might have contributed to the therapeutic efficacy, in part. Further clinical and in vitro studies are needed to determine whether the removal of NMO-IgG is directly relevant to the therapeutic efficacy. PE may hasten the functional recovery from corticosteroid-resistant relapses in some NMO-IgG-positive patients with NMO.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Neuromyelitis Optica Study Group (NEMOS), Trebst, C., Jarius, S., Berthele, A., Paul, F., Schippling, S., Wildemann, B., Borisow, N., Kleiter, I., Aktas, O., et al. (2014) · Journal of Neurology · doi:10.1007/s00415-013-7169-7 · Cited by 595
Szczepiorkowski, Z. M., Winters, J. L., Bandarenko, N., Kim, H. C., Linenberger, M. L., Marques, M. B., Sarode, R., Schwartz, J., Weinstein, R., & Shaz, B. H. (2010) · Journal of Clinical Apheresis · doi:10.1002/jca.20240 · Cited by 508
Neuromyelitis optica: Evaluation of 871 attacks and 1,153 treatment courses
Kleiter, I., Gahlen, A., Borisow, N., Fischer, K., Wernecke, K., Wegner, B., Hellwig, K., Pache, F., Ruprecht, K., Havla, J., et al. (2016) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.24554 · Cited by 432
Treatment of neuromyelitis optica: review and recommendations
Kimbrough, D. J., Fujihara, K., Jacob, A., Lana-Peixoto, M. A., Isabel Leite, M., Levy, M., Marignier, R., Nakashima, I., Palace, J., de Seze, J., et al. (2012) · Multiple Sclerosis and Related Disorders · doi:10.1016/j.msard.2012.06.002 · Cited by 260
Self-citationImmunology of neuromyelitis optica: a T cell-B cell collaboration
Mitsdoerffer, M., Kuchroo, V., & Korn, T. (2013) · Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1111/nyas.12118 · Cited by 91
Metadata
- Authors
- Watanabe, S., Nakashima, I., Misu, T., Miyazawa, I., Shiga, Y., Füjihara, K., & Itoyama, Y.
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2007-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 128-132
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2040728132
- Cited by
- 284
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Therapeutic efficacy of plasma exchange in NMO-IgG-positive patients with neuromyelitis optica. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1352458506071174
- The paper
- Watanabe, S., Nakashima, I., Misu, T., Miyazawa, I., Shiga, Y., Füjihara, K., & Itoyama, Y. (2007). Therapeutic efficacy of plasma exchange in NMO-IgG-positive patients with neuromyelitis optica. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458506071174
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.