The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls
Abstract
Objective To assess the characteristics of the 6-min walk (6MW) in multiple sclerosis (MS) subjects of varied disability, and controls. To assess the correlation of 6MW to subjective measures of fatigue, health status and ambulation using the modified fatigue impact scale (MFIS), short form-36 Health Questionnaire physical component score and MS walking scale (MSWS). Methods Forty MS expanded disability status scale [(EDSS) 0—6.5] and 20 control subjects were recruited from a MS outpatient clinic. Subjects completed survey material and three 6MWs with 1-h interval rest in a single study visit. Results There was no practice effect or fatigability with repeat 6MW tests with a one-h rest period between test sessions. The 6MW had excellent intra-[intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) = 0.95] and inter-rater (ICC = 0.91) reliability. MS subjects demonstrated reduced 6MW distance and speed compared with controls ( P < 0.0001). Within the MS population 6MW distance was significantly reduced with increasing disability ( P = 0.05). Compared with the EDSS, the 6MW had a stronger correlation to subjective measures of ambulation and physical fatigue: MSWS ( r = -0.81 versus 0.69) and MFISphy (0.66 versus 0.63). Conclusions The 6MW is a feasible, reproducible, and reliable measure in MS. MS subjects demonstrate motor fatigue in both 6MW distance and speed compared with controls. In MS subjects there is an inverse relationship between motor fatigue and disability. 6MW has a strong correlation to subjective measures of ambulation and physical fatigue. Multiple Sclerosis 2008; 14: 383—390. http://msj.sagepub.com
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis: An expanded disability status scale (EDSS)
Kurtzke, J. F. (1983) · Neurology · doi:10.1212/wnl.33.11.1444 · Cited by 15,011
ATS Statement: Guidelines for the Six-Minute Walk Test
(2002) · American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine · doi:10.1164/ajrccm.166.1.at1102 · Cited by 11,195
The impact of fatigue on patients with multiple sclerosis
Fisk, J. D., Pontefract, A., Ritvo, P. G., Archibald, C. J., & Murray, T. J. (1994) · Canadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · doi:10.1017/s0317167100048691 · Cited by 1,025 · cited 2×
“The fatigue impact scale, for example, has cognitive, physical and psychosocial components [2].”
Background
Cited by
Learmonth, Y. C., Motl, R. W., Sandroff, B. M., Pula, J. H., & Cadavid, D. (2013) · BMC Neurology · doi:10.1186/1471-2377-13-37 · Cited by 773
Balance, gait, and falls in multiple sclerosis
(2018) · Handbook of Clinical Neurology · doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-63916-5.00015-x · Cited by 271
Cohen, J. A., Reingold, S. C., Polman, C. H., & Wolinsky, J. S. (2012) · The Lancet Neurology · doi:10.1016/s1474-4422(12)70059-5 · Cited by 233
Self-citationBaert, I., Freeman, J., Smedal, T., Dalgas, U., Romberg, A., Kalron, A., Conyers, H., Elorriaga, I., Gebara, B., Gumse, J., et al. (2014) · Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair · doi:10.1177/1545968314521010 · Cited by 213
Coping Strategies and Mood Profiles in Patients with Multiple Sclerosis
Milanlioglu, A., Özdemir, P. G., Cilingir, V., Gülec, T. Ç., Aydin, M. N., & Tombul, T. (2014) · Arquivos de Neuro-Psiquiatria · doi:10.1590/0004-282x20140089 · Cited by 33
Metadata
- Authors
- Goldman, M. D., Marrie, R. A., & Cohen, J. A.
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2008-04
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 383-390
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2121149730
- Cited by
- 674
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 6.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1352458507082607
- The paper
- Goldman, M. D., Marrie, R. A., & Cohen, J. A. (2008). Evaluation of the six-minute walk in multiple sclerosis subjects and healthy controls. Multiple Sclerosis Journal. https://doi.org/10.1177/1352458507082607
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.