Cited by 213Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesBalance, Gait, and Falls PreventionStroke Rehabilitation and Recovery

Responsiveness and Clinically Meaningful Improvement, According to Disability Level, of Five Walking Measures After Rehabilitation in Multiple Sclerosis: A European Multicenter Study

Baert, Ilse, Freeman, Jennifer, Smedal, Tori, Dalgas, Ulrik, Romberg, Anders, Kalron, Alon, Conyers, Helen, Elorriaga, Iratxe +15 more·2014·Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair

Abstract

Background Evaluation of treatment effects on walking requires appropriate and responsive outcome measures. Objectives To determine responsiveness of 5 walking measures and provide reference values for clinically meaningful improvements, according to disability level, in persons with multiple sclerosis (pwMS). Methods Walking tests were measured pre- and postrehabilitation in 290 pwMS from 17 European centers. Combined anchor- and distribution-based methods determined responsiveness of objective short and long walking capacity tests (Timed 25-Foot Walk [T25FW] and 2- and 6-Minute Walk Tests [2MWT and 6MWT] and of the patient-reported Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale-12 [MSWS-12]). A global rating of change scale, from patients' and therapists' perspective, was used as external criteria to determine the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), minimally important change (MIC), and smallest real change (SRC). Patients were stratified into disability subgroups (Expanded Disability Status Scale score ≤4 [n = 98], >4 [n = 186]). Results MSWS-12, 2MWT, and 6MWT were more responsive (AUC 0.64-0.73) than T25FW (0.50-0.63), especially in moderate to severely disabled pwMS. Clinically meaningful changes (MICs) from patient and therapist perspective were -10.4 and -11.4 for MSWS-12 (P Conclusions Long walking tests and patient-reported MSWS-12 were more appropriate than short walking tests in detecting clinically meaningful improvement after physical rehabilitation,…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1545968314521010

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The twelve item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) is shown to correlate with improvement after rehabilitation, especially in early phases of the disease.

    “The twelve item Multiple Sclerosis Walking Scale (MSWS-12) (30), a self-reported questionnaire on walking ability in MS, is shown to correlate with improvement after rehabilitation, especially in early phases of the disease (31).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Baert, I., Freeman, J., Smedal, T., Dalgas, U., Romberg, A., Kalron, A., Conyers, H., Elorriaga, I., Gebara, B., Gumse, J., Heric, A., Jensen, E., Jones, K., Knuts, K., Maertens de Noordhout, B., Martic, A., Normann, B., Eijnde, B. O., Rasova, K., Santoyo Medina, C., Truyens, V., Wens, I., & Feys, P.
Affiliations
  • Hasselt University (BE)
  • University of Plymouth (GB)
  • Haukeland University Hospital (NO)
  • Aarhus University (DK)
  • Masku Neurological Rehabilitation Center, Masku, Finland
  • Sheba Medical Center (IL)
  • Poole Hospital NHS Foundation Trust (GB)
  • Eugenia Epalza Rehabilitation Center, Bilbao, Spain
  • National MS Center Melsbroek (BE)
  • Helsinki MS-Neuvola, Helsinki, Finland
  • Multiple Sclerosis Center, Hakadal AS, Norway
  • Danish Multiple Sclerosis Center (DK)
  • Rehabilitation and Multiple Sclerosis Center, Overpelt, Belgium
  • Centre Neurologique et de Réadaptation Fonctionelle, Fraiture-en-Condroz, Belgium
  • University Medical Center, Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • Nordland Hospital Trust (NO)
  • Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
  • Hospital de Dia de Barcelona, CEMCat, Barcelona, Spain
Venue
Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair
Published
2014-02-06
Volume
28
Issue
7
Pages
621-631
ISSN
  • 0888-4390 (ISSN-L)
  • 1545-9683
  • 1552-6844
OpenAlex
W2043572283
Cited by
213
References
34
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 23 · 2016: 17 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 5
FWCI
14.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Neurorehabilitation and neural repair (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Document Server@UHasselt (UHasselt) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Novartis
  • Universiteit Hasselt
  • Novartis Pharma
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation › Balance, Gait, and Falls Prevention
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rehabilitation › Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, walking capacity, responsiveness, minimally important change, 2-minute walk test, 6-minute walk test, Timed 25-Foot Walk, physical rehabilitation, disability severity, Expanded Disability Status Scale, patient-reported outcomes
MeSH terms
Adult, Disability Evaluation, Europe, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Multiple Sclerosis, Reference Standards, Walking, Treatment Outcome, Recovery of Function, Physical Therapy Modalities

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review