Cited by 65Multiple Sclerosis Research StudiesCancer survivorship and careHealth Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life

Neurological disability, psychological distress, and health-related quality of life in MS patients within the first three years after diagnosis

Kern, S, Schrempf, W, Schneider, H, Schultheiß, T, Reichmann, H, Ziemssen, T·2009·Multiple Sclerosis Journal

Abstract

Background Psychological distress and psychiatric co-morbidity are common in multiple sclerosis (MS) and is often associated with neurological disability as well as reduced quality of life. Objectives This study aimed to investigate psychological distress and the possible association with quality of life as well as neurological disability in MS patients within the first 3 years after diagnosis. Methods Psychological distress was measured using a standardized questionnaire (Symptom-Check-List-90-R; SCL-90-R) in 31 relapsing-remitting MS patients and 24 sex- and age-matched healthy controls. Results Psychological distress was significantly more pronounced in MS patients when compared to healthy controls. Interpersonal sensitivity and psychoticism were positively associated with neurological disability (Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS]). A high EDSS group (median split EDSS; 1.5) expressed significantly more psychological distress when compared to the low EDSS group and healthy controls. MS patients with minimal to no neurological disability (low EDSS group) also expressed significantly more emotional distress when compared to healthy controls. MS-related quality of life was positively associated with neurological disability as well as SCL-90-R scores. After adjusting for neurological disability, psychological distress was still significantly associated with quality of life. Conclusions Early stage MS patients significantly differ in their psychological distress when comp…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1352458509103300

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kern, S., Schrempf, W., Schneider, H., Schultheiß, T., Reichmann, H., & Ziemssen, T.
Affiliations
University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus (DE)
Corresponding author
Kern, S
Venue
Multiple Sclerosis Journal
Published
2009-05-29
Volume
15
Issue
6
Pages
752-758
ISSN
  • 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0970
OpenAlex
W2090042313
Cited by
65
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 7
FWCI
4.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Technische Universität Dresden
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Cancer survivorship and care
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Keywords
multiple sclerosis, psychological distress, neurological deficit, health-related quality of life, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, Expanded Disability Status Scale, interpersonal sensitivity, psychoticism, emotional distress, early multiple sclerosis
MeSH terms
Adult, Affective Symptoms, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Male, Predictive Value of Tests, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Social Support, Stress, Psychological, Comorbidity, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review