The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Primary progressive multiple sclerosis diagnostic criteria: a reappraisal
Abstract
The diagnostic criteria used in primary progressive (PP) and relapsing-remitting (RR) multiple sclerosis (MS) show substantial differences. This introduces complexity in the diagnosis of MS which could be resolved if these criteria could be unified in terms of the requirements for dissemination in space (DIS). The aim of this study was to assess whether a single algorithm may be used to demonstrate DIS in all forms of MS. Five sets of RRMS criteria for DIS were applied to a cohort of 145 patients with established PPMS (mean disease duration: 11 years - PPMS-1): C1: Barkhof-Tintoré (as in 2005 McDonald's criteria); C2: Swanton et al. (as in JNNP 2006); C3: presence of oligoclonal bands plus two lesions (as in McDonald's criteria); C4 and C5: a two-step approach was also followed (patients not fulfilling C1 or C2 were then assessed for C3). Two sets of PPMS criteria for DIS were applied: C6: Thompson et al. (as in 2001 McDonald's criteria); C7: 2005 McDonald criteria. A second sample of 55 patients with less than 5 years of disease duration (PPMS-2) was also analysed using an identical approach. For PPMS-1/PPMS-2, fulfilment was: C1:73.8%/66.7%; C2:72.1%/59.3%; C3:89%/79.2%; C4:96%/92.3%; C5:96%/85.7%; C6:85.8%/78.7%; C7:91%/80.4%. Levels of fulfilment suggest that the use of a single set of criteria for DIS in RRMS and PPMS might be feasible, and reinforce the added value of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) findings to increase fulfilment in PPMS. Unification of the DIS criteria for…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Brain T2 lesion load tends to be lower in PPMS and the combination of MRI and CSF findings provides a higher sensitivity than MRI alone.
“Brain T2 lesion load tends to be lower in PPMS 6 and the combination of MRI and CSF findings provides a higher sensitivity than MRI alone.20”
From Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges (2017) · cites this paper as [20]
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 25
- 10.1002/1531-8249(200006)47:6<831::AID-ANA21>3.0.CO;2-H · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.1032 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1002/ana.20703 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/brain/120.11.2059 · DOI · Paper page
- Tintore M., 2000, AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 21, 702
- 10.1136/jnnp.2005.073247 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(07)70176-X · DOI
- 10.1056/NEJM200009283431307 · DOI
- 10.1097/01.wco.0000169742.37159.e9 · DOI
- 10.1016/S1474-4422(06)70410-0 · DOI
- 10.1191/1352458504ms1027oa · DOI
- 10.1191/1352458504ms1026oa · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.2004.036590 · DOI
- 10.1212/WNL.52.4.839 · DOI
- 10.1136/jnnp.68.6.713 · DOI
- 10.1191/1352458502ms778oa · DOI
- 10.1212/01.wnl.0000173061.12776.1f · DOI
- 10.1002/ana.21375 · DOI
- 10.1177/135245850000600205 · DOI
- 10.1136/bmj.300.6725.631 · DOI
- 10.1177/1352458506071767 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2004.00797.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-1331.2007.01932.x · DOI
- 10.1177/135245850401000112 · DOI
- 10.1093/brain/awg261 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 revisions to the McDonald criteria
Polman, C. H., Reingold, S. C., Banwell, B., Clanet, M., Cohen, J. A., Filippi, M., Fujihara, K., Havrdova, E., Hutchinson, M., Kappos, L., et al. (2011) · Annals of Neurology · doi:10.1002/ana.22366 · Cited by 9,802
Self-citationDiagnosis of multiple sclerosis: progress and challenges
Brownlee, W. J., Hardy, T. A., Fazekas, F., & Miller, D. H. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30959-x · Cited by 701
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Montalban, X., Sastre-Garriga, J., Filippi, M., Khaleeli, Z., Téllez, N., Vellinga, M., Tur, C., Brochet, B., Barkhof, F., Rovaris, M., Miller, D., Polman, C., Rovira, A., & Thompson, A.
- Affiliations
- Unitat de Neuroimmunologia Clínica, Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia (CEMCat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain,
- Unitat de Neuroimmunologia Clínica, Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia (CEMCat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain, NMR Research Unit, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
- IRCCS Ospedale San Raffaele (IT)
- UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology (GB)
- Vall d'Hebron Hospital Universitari (ES)
- Department of Diagnostic Radiology, Free University Hospital, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux (FR)
- Unitat de Neuroimmunologia Clínica, Multiple Sclerosis Center of Catalonia (CEMCat) and Unitat de Ressonància Magnètica, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
- NMR Research Unit, Institute of Neurology, UCL, London, UK
- Venue
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-12
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1459-1465
- ISSN
- 1352-4585 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0970
- OpenAlex
- W2129055974
- Cited by
- 47
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 4.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Multiple Sclerosis Journal (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Amsterdam UMC (VU Amsterdam) - Institutional Repository (publishedVersion)
- Digital Academic REpository of VU University Amsterdam (Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam) (submittedVersion)
- UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
- Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
- Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Multiple Sclerosis Research Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Clinical Neurology › Peripheral Neuropathies and Disorders
- Keywords
- primary progressive multiple sclerosis, relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis, dissemination in space, diagnostic criteria, oligoclonal bands, cerebrospinal fluid findings, McDonald criteria, disease duration
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Brain, Cross-Sectional Studies, Europe, Evoked Potentials, Visual, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Middle Aged, Predictive Value of Tests, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Spinal Cord, Time Factors, Visual Pathways, Multiple Sclerosis, Chronic Progressive, Multiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-Remitting, Oligoclonal Bands, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review