Cited by 5Diabetes Management and ResearchDiabetes Management and EducationDietetics, Nutrition, and Education

Nutrition interventions in pediatric patients with type 1 diabetes: an evidence analysis center scoping review

Handu, Deepa, Piotrowski, Megan·2022·Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics

Abstract

The objective of this scoping review was to identify and characterize studies examining the effect of nutrition management interventions and effectiveness of medical nutrition therapy to improve nutrition-related outcomes in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes. An in-depth electronic search was conducted by a medical librarian in six databases: Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PsycINFO, The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, and Web of Science Core Collection. The literature search resulted in 5,122 records, and five records were identified through hand search. Of these 5,127 records, 22 articles and eight systematic reviews met our inclusion criteria. An equal number of the studies were experimental (ie, randomized or nonrandomized controlled trials, or noncontrolled trials) (n = 11) and observational (cohort, case-control, and cross-sectional) (n = 11) with the remaining studies being systematic reviews/meta-analyses (n = 8). Most of these studies were conducted in United States or Europe. Based on this scoping review, the majority of studies focus on either carbohydrate counting or evaluation of dietary intake patterns with little emphasis on tailored patient education/counseling services specifically designed to meet a young child's or his/her family's individual needs. Indeed, only four studies in this scoping review used dietary counseling and/or medical nutrition therapy. As such, there remains a significant gap in the literature as it relates to the efficacy and long-term management implications of tailored nutrition interventions in young children with type 1 diabetes.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jand.2021.02.020

Cites

41 of 41 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

4 of the 45 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Handu, D., & Piotrowski, M.
Affiliations
  • Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (US)
  • Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center (US)
Corresponding author
Handu, Deepa
Venue
Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-02
Volume
122
Issue
2
Pages
424-431
ISSN
2212-2672 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3154971630
Cited by
5
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
0.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of the Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics Foundation
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Diabetes Management and Education
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Dietetics, Nutrition, and Education
Keywords
type 1 diabetes, pediatric diabetes, medical nutrition therapy, nutrition interventions, carbohydrate counting, nutrition counseling, dietary habits, children and adolescents
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Child, Child, Preschool, Clinical Trials as Topic, Counseling, Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1, Diet, Diabetic, Dietary Carbohydrates, Eating, Female, Humans, Male, Patient Education as Topic, Nutrition Therapy, Diet, Carbohydrate-Restricted, Observational Studies as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review