The DOI matches its Crossref record; 25 of the 25 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pilot randomised controlled trial of Help4Mood, an embodied virtual agent-based system to support treatment of depression
Open accessAbstract
Introduction: Help4Mood is an interactive system with an embodied virtual agent (avatar) to assist in self-monitoring of patients receiving treatment for depression. Help4Mood supports self-report and biometric monitoring and includes elements of cognitive behavioural therapy. We aimed to evaluate system use and acceptability, to explore likely recruitment and retention rates in a clinical trial and to obtain an estimate of potential treatment response with a view to conducting a future randomised controlled trial (RCT). Methods: We conducted a pilot RCT of Help4Mood in three centres, in Romania, Spain and Scotland, UK. Patients with diagnosed depression (major depressive disorder) and current mild/moderate depressive symptoms were randomised to use the system for four weeks in addition to treatment as usual (TAU) or to TAU alone. Results: Twenty-seven individuals were randomised and follow-up data were obtained from 21 participants (12/13 Help4Mood, 9/14 TAU). Half of participants randomised to Help4Mood used it regularly (more than 10 times); none used it every day. Acceptability varied between users. Some valued the emotional responsiveness of the system, while others found it too repetitive. Intention to treat analysis showed a small difference in change of Beck Depression Inventory II (BDI-2) scores (Help4Mood –5.7 points, TAU –4.2). Post-hoc on-treatment analysis suggested that participants who used Help4Mood regularly experienced a median change in BDI-2 of –8 points. Conclusion: Help4Mood is acceptable to some patients receiving treatment for depression although none used it as regularly as intended. Changes in depression symptoms in individuals who used the system regularly reached potentially meaningful levels.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Only 1 study, a pilot RCT, recruited participants from clinician caseloads or registers [28].”
From Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: mixed-method systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Generally, greater engagement with the conversational agent resulted in greater reductions in psychological distress [22,26,28,29,33].”
From Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: mixed-method systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Finally, the 2 uncontrolled studies included in the review [22,29] and 2 studies that did not test for between-group effects [28,30] reported reductions in depression [28-30] and loneliness [22] postintervention.”
From Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: mixed-method systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Remarkably, the only study that reported difficulties in recruiting participants relied on clinicians to refer patients to the study [28].”
From Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: mixed-method systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Controlled studies with active control conditions (eg, another conversational agent or human psychological therapy) failed to demonstrate superior effects [24,27,28].”
From Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: mixed-method systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“Participants reported that they liked the ability to customize the gender and appearance of ECAs [28] and the option to tailor the session length to their own needs [28].”
From Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: mixed-method systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“The predominant challenges to intervention with a conversational agent included repetitive content [22,25,26,28,29,33], limitations in the agents ability to understand or respond appropriately [22,25,26,29], a shallow or superficial relationship [28,33], the sound and quality of the agents voice [32], and specific intervention tools or content [25,29].”
From Conversational agents in the treatment of mental health problems: mixed-method systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [28]
In the citing paper
“A randomized controlled trial was conducted to evaluate Help4Mood [66]. Twenty-eight depressed patients were recruited and randomized into two treatment groups: Help4Mood and TAU.”
From Current state and future directions of technology-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention for major depressive disorder: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“patients in the TAU group achieved greater clinical improvement compared to patients who used the application”
From Current state and future directions of technology-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention for major depressive disorder: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“regular users were more likely to obtain greater clinical improvement compared to users with low compliance”
From Current state and future directions of technology-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention for major depressive disorder: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“Outcome measures, which included the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology—Self Report (QIDS-SR), indicated reduced symptoms in both samples.”
From Current state and future directions of technology-based ecological momentary assessment and intervention for major depressive disorder: a systematic review (2019) · cites this paper as [66]
In the citing paper
“Burton et al. (52), for example, also found that their embodied CA could serve as an adjunct for cognitive therapy.”
From Computer-assisted avatar-based treatment for dysfunctional beliefs in depressive inpatients: A pilot study (2021) · cites this paper as [52]
Citations
Cites
The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure
Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x · Cited by 44,910
Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L)
Herdman, M., Gudex, C., Lloyd, A., Janssen, M., Kind, P., Parkin, D., Bonsel, G., & Badia, X. (2011) · Quality of Life Research · doi:10.1007/s11136-011-9903-x · Cited by 9,795 · cited 1×
“At baseline and four weeks participants completed the BDI-2;(16) the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptoms-Self-Report (QIDS-SR);(17) Dysfunctional Attitude Scale-Short Form 2 (DASSF2),(18) a measure of common negative cognitions) and the EQ-5D-5L generic quality of life measure.(19)”
MethodBeck, A. T., Steer, R. A., & Brown, G. (2011) · PsycTESTS Dataset · doi:10.1037/t00742-000 · Cited by 7,535
Rush, A. J., Trivedi, M. H., Ibrahim, H. M., Carmody, T. J., Arnow, B., Klein, D. N., Markowitz, J. C., Ninan, P. T., Kornstein, S., Manber, R., et al. (2003) · Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s0006-3223(02)01866-8 · Cited by 3,829
The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010
Wittchen, H. U., Jacobi, F., Rehm, J., Gustavsson, A., Svensson, M., Jönsson, B., Olesen, J., Allgulander, C., Alonso, J., Faravelli, C., et al. (2011) · European Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/j.euroneuro.2011.07.018 · Cited by 3,754
Ferrari, A. J., Charlson, F. J., Norman, R. E., Patten, S. B., Freedman, G., Murray, C. J. L., Vos, T., & Whiteford, H. A. (2013) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1001547 · Cited by 3,115
Computer-based psychological treatments for depression: A systematic review and meta-analysis
Richards, D., & Richardson, T. (2012) · Clinical Psychology Review · doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2012.02.004 · Cited by 1,442
Sobocki, P., Jönsson, B., Angst, J., & Rehnberg, C. (2006) · PubMed · Cited by 533
Internet-based psychological treatments for depression
Johansson, R., & Andersson, G. (2012) · Expert Review of Neurotherapeutics · doi:10.1586/ern.12.63 · Cited by 509
Wiles, N., Thomas, L., Abel, A., Ridgway, N., Turner, N., Campbell, J., Garland, A., Hollinghurst, S., Jerrom, B., Kessler, D., et al. (2013) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(12)61552-9 · Cited by 340 · cited 3×
“1Centre of Academic Primary Care, University of Aberdeen, UK 2Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania 3Centre for Population Health Sciences, University of Edinburgh, UK 4School of Informatics, University of Edinburgh, UK 5Department of Psychology, Babes-Bolyai University,…”
Influential
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Sobocki P, 2006, J Ment Health Policy Econ, 9, 87
- Pagliari C, 2012, Stud Health Technol Inform, 181, 329
- Burton C, 2012, Int J Integr Care, 12; 4
- Wolters M, Burton C, Matheson C, et al. Help4Mood–supporting joint sense making in the treatment of major depressive disorder. In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Interactive Systems in Healthcare (WISH) , Washington DC, November 2013.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Naslund, J. A., Aschbrenner, K. A., Araya, R., Marsch, L. A., Unützer, J., Patel, V., & Bartels, S. J. (2017) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30096-2 · Cited by 638
Automated assessment of psychiatric disorders using speech: A systematic review
Low, D. M., Bentley, K. H., & Ghosh, S. (2020) · Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology · doi:10.1002/lio2.354 · Cited by 545
Abd-Alrazaq, A. A., Rababeh, A., Alajlani, M., Bewick, B. M., & Househ, M. (2020) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/16021 · Cited by 503
“Half of the included studies (6/12) examined the effect of using chatbots on the severity of depression [27-32].”
Artificially intelligent chatbots in digital mental health interventions: a review
Boucher, E. M., Harake, N. R., Ward, H. E., Stoeckl, S. E., Vargas, J., Minkel, J., Parks, A. C., & Zilca, R. (2021) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2021.2013200 · Cited by 440
The WPA-Lancet psychiatry commission on the future of psychiatry
Bhugra, D., Tasman, A., Pathare, S., Priebe, S., Smith, S., Torous, J., Arbuckle, M. R., Langford, A., Alarcón, R. D., Chiu, H. F. K., et al. (2017) · The Lancet Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/s2215-0366(17)30333-4 · Cited by 392
Metadata
- Authors
- Burton, C., Szentagotai Tatar, A., McKinstry, B., Matheson, C., Matu, S., Moldovan, R., Macnab, M., Farrow, E., David, D., Pagliari, C., Serrano Blanco, A., Wolters, M., & for the Help4Mood Consortium
- Affiliations
- University of Aberdeen (GB)
- Department of Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy, Babes-Bolyai University, Romania
- University of Edinburgh (GB)
- Babeș-Bolyai University (RO)
- Parc Sanitari San Joan De Deu, Spain
- ORCID
- Venue
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2016-07-09
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 348-355
- ISSN
- 1357-633X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-1109
- OpenAlex
- W2184155438
- Cited by
- 125
- References
- 25
- Citations by year
- 2026: 11 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 8
- FWCI
- 6.51
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- Locations
- Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (submittedVersion)
- Edinburgh Research Explorer (University of Edinburgh) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/J017728/1, EP/J017728/2)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
- Keywords
- depression, self-monitoring, cognitive behavioral therapy, major depressive disorder, treatment acceptability, system use, biometric monitoring, Beck Depression Inventory, digital mental health interventions
- MeSH terms
- Adolescent, Adult, Depression, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Pilot Projects, Psychiatric Status Rating Scales, Surveys and Questionnaires, Romania, Scotland, Spain, User-Computer Interface, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Patient Satisfaction, Telemedicine, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Young Adult
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
