Cited by 57Mental Health via WritingRheumatoid Arthritis Research and TherapiesPsychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments

Effects of emotional disclosure on psychological and physiological outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: an exploratory home-based study

Wetherell, Mark A., Byrne-Davis, Lucie, Dieppe, Paul, Donovan, Jenny, Brookes, Sara, Byron, Margaret, Vedhara, Kavita, Horne, Robert +2 more·2005·Journal of Health Psychology

Abstract

The effects of an exploratory, home-based emotional disclosure intervention on psychological and physiological outcomes were assessed in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Patients were randomly assigned to a disclosure group (n = 19) in which they wrote/talked about traumatic personal experiences, or to a control group (n = 15) in which they wrote/talked about the events of a particular day. Participants undertook these tasks for periods of 20 minutes on 4 consecutive days. The disclosure group demonstrated increases in negative mood and objective markers of disease activity at 1 week post-intervention. However, there were significant trends for the disclosure group to demonstrate minor improvements in mood and stability in disease activity, compared with the control group. These group differences appeared to be due to deteriorations in the control group more than improvements in the disclosure group.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1359105305049778

Cites

26 of 26 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wetherell, M. A., Byrne-Davis, L., Dieppe, P., Donovan, J., Brookes, S., Byron, M., Vedhara, K., Horne, R., Weinman, J., & Miles, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Bristol (GB)
  • University of Brighton (GB)
  • Guy's Hospital (GB)
  • University of York (GB)
Venue
Journal of Health Psychology
Published
2005-03
Volume
10
Issue
2
Pages
277-285
ISSN
  • 1359-1053 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7277
OpenAlex
W1977898312
Cited by
57
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2021: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Health Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
  • Bristol Research (University of Bristol) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Portal (King's College London) (submittedVersion)
  • Northumbria Research Link (Northumbria University) (submittedVersion)
  • University of Brighton Repository (University of Brighton) (submittedVersion)
  • Explore Bristol Research (submittedVersion)
Funders
Economic and Social Research Council (PTA-026-27-0025)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Rheumatoid Arthritis Research and Therapies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
Keywords
emotional disclosure, rheumatoid arthritis, traumatic events, home-based intervention, negative mood, disease activity, physiological outcomes, psychological outcomes, expressive writing
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Affect, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Depression, Disability Evaluation, Female, Humans, Life Change Events, Male, Middle Aged, Disclosure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review