Cited by 143Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchEthics in medical practiceOccupational Health and Performance

Compromised Conscience: A Scoping Review of Moral Injury Among Firefighters, Paramedics, and Police Officers

Open access
Lentz, Liana M., Smith-MacDonald, Lorraine, Malloy, David, Carleton, R. Nicholas, Brémault-Phillips, Suzette·2021·Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract

Background: Public Safety Personnel (e.g., firefighters, paramedics, and police officers) are routinely exposed to human suffering and need to make quick, morally challenging decisions. Such decisions can affect their psychological wellbeing. Participating in or observing an event or situation that conflicts with personal values can potentially lead to the development of moral injury. Common stressors associated with moral injury include betrayal, inability to prevent death or harm, and ethical dilemmas. Potentially psychologically traumatic event exposures and post-traumatic stress disorder can be comorbid with moral injury; however, moral injury extends beyond fear to include spiritual, cognitive, emotional or existential struggles, which can produce feelings of severe shame, guilt, and anger. Objective: This scoping review was designed to identify the extant empirical research regarding the construct of moral injury, its associated constructs, and how it relates to moral distress in firefighters, paramedics, and police officers. Methods: A systematic literature search of peer-reviewed research was conducted using databases MEDLINE, EMBASE, APA PsychInfo, CINHAL PLUS, Web of Science, SCOPUS, and Google Scholar. Included studies were selected based on the inclusion criteria before being manually extracted and independently screened by two reviewers. Results: The initial database search returned 777 articles, 506 of which remained after removal of duplicates. Following review of titles, abstracts, and full texts, 32 studies were included in the current review. Participants in the articles were primarily police officers, with fewer articles focusing on paramedics and firefighters. There were two studies that included mixed populations (i.e., one study with police officers, firefighters, and other emergency service workers; one study with paramedic and firefighter incident commanders). Most studies were qualitative and focused on four topics: values, ethical decision-making, organizational betrayal, and spirituality. Conclusion: Public safety organizations appear to recognize the experience of moral distress or moral injury among public safety personnel that results from disconnects between personal core values, formal and informal organizational values, vocational duties, and expectations. Further research is needed to better understand moral distress or moral injury specific to public safety personnel and inform training and treatment in support of public safety personnel mental health.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.639781

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Buechner B. Jinkerson J. (2016). “ Are moral injury and PTSD distinct syndromes: conceptual differences and clinical implications,” in Veteran and Family Reintegration, eds Guilarte M. Buechner B. (Washington, DC: Fielding Graduate University Press), 47– 79.
  2. Johnson R. L. (2011). “ Developing moral resilience amidst moral complexity,” in Proceedings of the Fort Leavenworth Ethics Symposium: Exploring the Professional Military Ethic, Symposium Report, eds Wiggins M. H. Dabeck L. (Fort Leavenworth, KS: CGSC Foundation Press), 275– 284.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lentz, L. M., Smith-MacDonald, L., Malloy, D., Carleton, R. N., & Brémault-Phillips, S.
Affiliations
  • Western University (CA)
  • University of Regina (CA)
Corresponding author
Lentz, Liana M.
Venue
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2021-03-31
Volume
12
Pages
639781-639781
ISSN
1664-1078 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3150699884
Cited by
143
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 34 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 23 · 2021: 5
FWCI
2.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Frontiers in Psychology (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • oURspace (University of Regina) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Ethics in medical practice
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Health and Performance
Keywords
moral injury, moral distress, public safety personnel, firefighters, paramedics, police officers, ethical decision-making, personal values, spirituality, guilt and shame, workplace mental health, trauma exposure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review