Task-based language teaching: An empirical study of task transfer
Abstract
Since the 1980s, task-based language teaching (TBLT) has enjoyed considerable interest from researchers of second language acquisition (SLA), resulting in a growing body of empirical evidence to support how and to what extent this approach can promote language learning. Although transferability and generalizability are critical assumptions for TBLT, there is little empirical evidence that task-related language abilities are indeed transferable. The current study was conducted to address this need for empirical research on generalizability and transfer critical for the planning of teaching and assessment of learning by specifically investigating whether or not transfer occurs between two similar pedagogic tasks. Fifty-three randomly assigned low-level adult second language learners were trained in a computer lab to complete one of two pedagogic tasks or no task, after which all participants were tested on two transfer tasks. Although the results of a MANCOVA did not provide statistically significant evidence of transfer, a post hoc analysis on a subset of the lowest proficiency learners suggests that task-related language abilities are transferable. Directions for future research and implications for teaching and assessment are discussed in light of the present findings.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Categorical data analysis: Away from ANOVAs (transformation or not) and towards logit mixed models
Jaeger, T. F. (2008) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2007.11.007 · Cited by 3,317 · cited 2× · see citing works
“can be problematic (Jaeger, 2008); thus, a mixed-model logistic regression was conducted using binary trial level data.”
MethodGick, M. L., & Holyoak, K. J. (1980) · Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1016/0010-0285(80)90013-4 · Cited by 2,552 · cited 3× · see citing works
“Gick and Holyoak (1980) found evidence of far transfer in a prototypical analogical transfer experiment between a military context and medical context, and Chen (1996) demonstrated that the distance between knowledge domains only impedes successful transfer in some cases where there is an…”
BackgroundResultInfluentialWhen and where do we apply what we learn?: A taxonomy for far transfer
Barnett, S. M., & Ceci, S. J. (2002) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.128.4.612 · Cited by 2,076 · cited 12× · see citing works
“Although the content of the two shopping tasks and the content of the two directions tasks would be considered closer on the continuum as concerns skill and memory demands, the contexts of all four tasks (the two training tasks and the two transfer tasks) might be considered further apart on the continuum proposed by…”
BackgroundInfluentialSchmidt, R. A., & Bjork, R. A. (1992) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00029.x · Cited by 1,582 · cited 2× · see citing works
“Schmidt and Bjork (1992) contend that in order to facilitate learning processing activities need to be considered for both the training task and the transfer task.”
BackgroundTransfer of Training: A Meta-Analytic Review
Blume, B. D., Ford, J. K., Baldwin, T. T., & Huang, J. L. (2010) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206309352880 · Cited by 1,477 · see citing works
The influence of improvement in one mental function upon the efficiency of other functions. (I).
Woodworth, R. S., & Thorndike, E. L. (1901) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0074898 · Cited by 1,223 · see citing works
Three Approaches to Task-Based Syllabus Design
Long, M. H., & Crookes, G. (1992) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587368 · Cited by 866 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
In Defense of Tasks and TBLT: Nonissues and Real Issues
Long, M. H. (2016) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s0267190515000057 · Cited by 359 · see citing works
- Authors
- Benson, S. D.
- Affiliations
- University of Maryland, College Park (US)
- Corresponding author
- Benson, Susan D
- Venue
- Language Teaching Research
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2015-02-09
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 341-365
- ISSN
- 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
- 1477-0954
- OpenAlex
- W2313872081
- Cited by
- 109
- References
- 7
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 45 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2013: 1
- FWCI
- 17.88
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
- Keywords
- task-based language teaching, transfer of learning, generalizability, second language acquisition, adult second language learners, computer-assisted language learning, language assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review