Cited by 95EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningFrench Language Learning Methods

Affective factors influencing fluent performance: French learners’ appraisals of second language speech tasks

Open access
Kormos, Judit, Préfontaine, Yvonne·2017·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

The present mixed-methods study examined the role of learner appraisals of speech tasks in second language (L2) French fluency. Forty adult learners in a Canadian immersion program participated in the study that compared four sources of data: (1) objectively measured utterance fluency in participants’ performances of three narrative tasks differing in their conceptualization and formulation demands, (2) a questionnaire on their interest, task-related anxiety, task motivation, and perceived success in task-completion, (3) an interview in which they elaborated on their perceptions of the tasks, and (4) subjective ratings of their performances by three native speakers. Findings showed the cognitive demands of tasks were associated with learners’ affective responses to tasks as well as objective and subjective measures of fluency. Furthermore, task-related anxiety and perceived success in task completion were the most important affective factors associated with fluent task performance, whereas interest and task motivation were correlated with native speakers’ fluency ratings. These results are discussed in terms of how task design and implementation can contribute to enhanced task motivation and performance in the classroom.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362168816683562

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kormos, J., & Préfontaine, Y.
Affiliations
  • Lancaster University (GB)
  • Oracle (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Kormos, Judit
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2016-12-26
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
699-716
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2574758868
Cited by
95
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 1 · 2013: 1
FWCI
21.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Linguistics and Language › French Language Learning Methods
Keywords
second language fluency, French as a second language, emotional factors, task motivation, student learning interest, perceived success, task design, narrative task, immersion programs

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review