Cited by 96EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningSecond Language Learning and Teaching

Is fluency being ‘neglected’ in the classroom? Teacher understanding of fluency and related classroom practices

Tavakoli, Parvaneh, Hunter, Ann-Marie·2018·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

This article reports on a study examining second language (L2) teachers’ understanding of speech fluency and their self-reported classroom practices for promoting it. Qualitative and quantitative data collected from 84 L2 teachers in England were analysed to answer the research questions. In addition to the descriptive statistics and lexical frequency analysis used to explore teacher understanding of fluency, Rossiter, Derwing, Manimtim and Thomson’s (2010) framework was employed to analyse the teachers’ reported classroom practices. The results suggest that teachers often define fluency in a broad sense, with many using fluency and speaking ability interchangeably. Similarly, a large majority of the activities reported by the teachers were useful for enhancing speaking practice rather than focusing on fluency specifically. The findings underline the interaction between teacher understanding and their methodology (Borg, 2003), and highlight a mismatch between what fluency research recommends and what teachers do in class. Though the study highlights the complex and multifaceted nature of L2 oral fluency, we argue that adopting a narrower understanding could help teachers take a more active and practical approach to promoting fluency in the classroom.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362168817708462

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Task repetition is an effective teaching technique for fostering L2 learners' fluency.

    “Task repetition is an effective teaching technique for fostering L2 learners' fluency (Bygate, 2018;Lambert et al., 2017;Tavakoli & Hunter, 2018).”

    From MASSED TASK REPETITION IS A DOUBLE-EDGED SWORD FOR FLUENCY DEVELOPMENT (2022) · cites this paper as Tavakoli & Hunter, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Tavakoli, P., & Hunter, A.-M.
Affiliations
  • University of Reading (GB)
  • St Mary’s University, UK
Corresponding author
Tavakoli, Parvaneh
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2017-05-10
Volume
22
Issue
3
Pages
330-349
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W2612365358
Cited by
96
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1
FWCI
36.49
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion)
  • CentAUR (University of Reading) (acceptedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Literature and Literary Theory › Second Language Learning and Teaching
Keywords
speech fluency, second language teachers, teacher understanding, teaching practice, speaking practice, teacher methodology, English as a second language

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review