Cited by 4EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningSecond Language Acquisition and LearningArtificial Intelligence in Education

Beyond the interface: Supporting beginner-level CEFR mediation and learner autonomy with ChatGPT

Open access
Lukešová, Alice, Jennings, Petra Juna·2025·Language Teaching Research

Abstract

This study explores how ChatGPT, used as a dialogic mediator, supports CEFR-based mediation and learner autonomy among multilingual university students at A1 to A2 proficiency levels in Spanish. A key finding is the contrast between learners’ observable autonomy during AI-mediated tasks and the deeper strategic awareness revealed in post-task reflections. Grounded in sociocultural theory and the CEFR (Common European Framework of Reference for Languages) Companion Volume (2020), the study examines how learners used ChatGPT to interpret texts, clarify vocabulary, and engage in structured argumentation. All tasks were conducted in Spanish, which was neither the students’ native language nor the primary language in which ChatGPT was trained. Twenty-four students completed structured Spanish-language tasks with ChatGPT and submitted written reflections in their native languages. Qualitative content analysis, guided by CEFR mediation descriptors, revealed frequent use of strategies related to Mediating Texts and Facilitating Communication. During the tasks, students often relied on ChatGPT for linguistic support. However, their reflections demonstrated higher levels of metacognitive autonomy, including goal-setting, critical evaluation of AI feedback, and comparison of digital tools. These findings highlight the importance of combining AI-supported interaction with structured reflection to promote communicative competence and digital agency. The study also points to the need for adapting CEFR mediation frameworks to better capture the dynamics of AI-mediated language learning.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/13621688251393481

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • These approaches keep students cognitively engaged and make it more difficult for them to drift into passive acceptance or superficial completion.

    “These approaches keep students cognitively engaged and make it more difficult for them to drift into passive acceptance or superficial completion (Lee et al., 2024; Joo et al., 2026; Lukešová & Jennings, 2025; Sun et al., 2026; R. Zhou et al., 2025).”

    From Generative AI, Cognitive Offloading, and Learner Agency in Higher Education: A Scoping Review (2026) · cites this paper as Lukešová & Jennings, 2025

    The Discussion reports cognitive engagement and critical evaluation in students’ post-task reflections, and the recommendations in “Rethinking CEFR mediation and plurilingualism in AI-enhanced contexts” call for structured reflection and scrutiny of AI-generated language (pages unavailable). But the paper does not establish that these approaches prevent passive acceptance or superficial completion; it notes that learners often relied on ChatGPT during tasks. (LLM, conf=0.83)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lukešová, A., & Jennings, P. J.
Affiliations
Czech Technical University in Prague (CZ)
Corresponding author
Lukešová, Alice
Venue
Language Teaching Research
Published
2025-12-23
ISSN
  • 1362-1688 (ISSN-L)
  • 1477-0954
OpenAlex
W7116862006
Cited by
4
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
14.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
Language Teaching Research (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
Keywords
ChatGPT, AI-assisted language learning, learner autonomy, Spanish as a foreign language, metacognitive strategies, digital agency, communicative competence, sociocultural theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review