Cited by 108Natural Language Processing TechniquesTopic ModelingEthics and Social Impacts of AI

ChatGPT: not all languages are equal

Seghier, Mohamed L.·2023·Nature

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/d41586-023-00680-3

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Seghier, M. L.
Affiliations
Khalifa University of Science and Technology (AE)
Corresponding author
Seghier, Mohamed L.
Venue
Nature
Published
2023-03-07
Volume
615
Issue
7951
Pages
216-216
ISSN
  • 0028-0836 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-4687
OpenAlex
W4323360926
Cited by
108
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 34 · 2022: 1
FWCI
10.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nature (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Natural Language Processing Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
Keywords
ChatGPT, large language models, language bias, multilingual language models, language inequality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review