Cited by 64Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes

Validity of the Revised Children’s Anxiety and Depression Scale for youth with autism spectrum disorders

Sterling, Lindsey, Renno, Patricia, Storch, Eric A, Ehrenreich-May, Jill, Lewin, Adam B, Arnold, Elysse, Lin, Enjey, Wood, Jeffrey·2015·Autism

Abstract

High rates of anxiety and depression are reported among youth with autism spectrum disorders. These conditions are generally assessed using measures validated for typically developing youth. Few studies have investigated their validity for autism spectrum disorders, which is crucial for accurate assessment and the provision of proper treatment. The Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale was evaluated with 67 youth with autism spectrum disorders to examine its utility in measuring anxiety and depression in this population. Parents and children (aged 11-15 years) referred to a multisite intervention study completed the Pediatric Anxiety Rating Scale, Multidimensional Anxiety Scale for Children, Anxiety Disorders Interview Schedule, Child Behavior Checklist, and Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale. Results suggest acceptable internal consistency of the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale. Modest convergent validity was found among the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale and other standardized measures of anxiety and depression. There were stronger correlations between Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale Total scores and subscales of measures expected to correlate significantly than those not expected to correlate. One exception was a significant association between the Revised Children's Anxiety and Depression Scale and Child Behavior Checklist Attention subscale, calling into question the divergent validity in separating…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361313510066

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sterling, L., Renno, P., Storch, E. A., Ehrenreich-May, J., Lewin, A. B., Arnold, E., Lin, E., & Wood, J.
Affiliations
  • University of California, USA
  • University of South Florida (US)
  • University of Miami, USA
Venue
Autism
Published
2014-01-13
Volume
19
Issue
1
Pages
113-117
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2132751150
Cited by
64
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 1
FWCI
2.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R34HD65270-01, R34HD065270)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, anxiety, depression, psychometric validity, convergent validity, discriminant validity, internal consistency, adolescents, high-functioning autism, attention deficits, Child Behavior Checklist
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Anxiety, Anxiety Disorders, Autistic Disorder, Child, Child Development Disorders, Pervasive, Depression, Humans, Psychometrics, Surveys and Questionnaires, Reproducibility of Results, Asperger Syndrome

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review