Cited by 275Autism Spectrum Disorder ResearchChildren's Physical and Motor DevelopmentPhysical Activity and Health

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 50 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The impacts of physical activity intervention on physical and cognitive outcomes in children with autism spectrum disorder

Abstract

This study examined the effects of a 12-week physical activity intervention on the motor skill proficiency and executive function of 22 boys (aged 9.08 ± 1.75 years) with autism spectrum disorder. In Phase I of the 12 weeks, 11 boys with autism spectrum disorder (Group A) received the intervention, whereas the other 11 boys with autism spectrum disorder (Group B) did not (true control, no intervention). The arrangement was reversed in Phase II, which lasted an additional 12 weeks. The Bruininks–Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition, and the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test were conducted three times for each participant (Group A, primary grouping: baseline (T1), post-assessment (T2), and follow-up assessment (T3); Group B, control grouping: T1−T2; intervention condition, T2−T3). The main findings were that both groups of children with autism spectrum disorder significantly exhibited improvements in motor skill proficiency (the total motor composite and two motor-area composites) and executive function (three indices of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test) after 12 weeks of physical activity intervention. In addition, the effectiveness appeared to have been sustained for at least 12 weeks in Group A. The findings provide supporting evidence that physical activity interventions involving table tennis training may be a viable therapeutic option for treating children with autism spectrum disorder.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1362361316633562

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Chen YC, 2015, Physical Education Journal, 48, 105
  2. Heaton RK, 2003, Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: Computer Version 4, Research Edition (WCST: CV4)
  3. Krug DA, 2008, Autism Behavior Checklist-Taiwan Version (ABCT)

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–274 of 274

Metadata

Authors
Pan, C.-Y., Chu, C.-H., Tsai, C.-L., Sung, M.-C., Huang, C.-Y., & Ma, W.-Y.
Affiliations
  • National Kaohsiung Normal University (TW)
  • National Cheng Kung University (TW)
Corresponding author
Pan, Chien-Yu
Venue
Autism
Published
2016-07-09
Volume
21
Issue
2
Pages
190-202
ISSN
  • 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7005
OpenAlex
W2317407615
Cited by
275
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 34 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 39 · 2023: 37 · 2022: 33 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 22 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 6 · 2016: 1
FWCI
8.70
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Autism (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Children's Physical and Motor Development
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Physical Activity and Health
Keywords
autism spectrum disorder, physical activity interventions, motor skill proficiency, executive function, table tennis training, children, cognitive outcomes, sustained intervention effects
MeSH terms
Autism Spectrum Disorder, Child, Exercise Therapy, Humans, Male, Motor Skills, Exercise, Treatment Outcome, Cross-Over Studies, Executive Function

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review