The DOI matches its Crossref record; 82 of the 82 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; none of the 153 sources its claims cite is checked for support yet.
Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review
Open accessAbstract
Feeding problems, such as picky eating and food avoidance, are common in youth with autism. Other feeding and eating problems (e.g. disordered eating, fear of trying new foods, and insistence on specific food presentation) are also common in this population. This scoping review describes the nature and extent of feeding and eating problems in autistic youth and reports characteristics of autistic youth who experience such issues. Thirty-four studies were included in the current review, with almost all studies (91%) investigating feeding problems. Only 9% of studies examined concern with weight, shape, and/or body image, but several authors noted that disordered eating attitudes and behaviors may occur more frequently in those with autism than their peers without autism. No common individual characteristics (e.g. cognitive functioning and autism symptom severity) were identified for youth who experience feeding or eating problems. Although differentiating “feeding” from “eating” problems is critical for accurate identification and treatment of these issues, the existing literature has failed to do so. We propose that in future research “eating problems” be used when behaviors involve preoccupation with food, eating, or body image, and “feeding problems” be used when such preoccupation is absent. Lay abstract: Feeding problems, such as picky eating and food avoidance, are common in youth with autism. Other, broader difficulties with feeding and eating (eating disorder symptoms such as restricting food intake or preoccupation with body shape or weight and insistence on specific food presentation) are also common in autistic individuals. Here, we describe the nature and extent of feeding and eating problems in youth with autism. We found no common characteristics (such as severity of autism symptoms) that best describe autistic youth who experience problems with feeding or eating. Almost all studies we reviewed focused on problems with feeding (selective or picky eating), and only a few studies focused on eating disorder symptoms (concern with weight, shape, and/or body image). However, some researchers reported that eating disorder symptoms may occur more often in autistic individuals compared to their peers without autism. Many studies used the terms “feeding” and “eating” problems interchangeably, but understanding the difference between these problems is important for researchers to be consistent, as well as for proper identification and treatment. We suggest future researchers use “eating problems” when behaviors involve preoccupation with food, eating, or body image, and “feeding problems” when this preoccupation is absent. We highlight the importance of understanding whether feeding or eating problems are separate from autism traits, and the role of caregivers and other adults in the child’s treatment. Considerations for health-care providers to assist with diagnosis and treatment are also provided.
Overview
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This scoping review synthesized 34 studies on feeding and eating problems in autistic youth and found that almost all research focused on feeding problems, especially food selectivity, while only 9% examined weight, shape, and/or body image concerns. No consistent individual characteristics (e.g., cognitive functioning, autism symptom severity) were identified for youth with these problems, and the literature often used “feeding” and “eating” interchangeably.
Key findings
- Across 34 included studies, 91% investigated feeding problems and only 9% (3 studies) examined constructs fitting the authors’ definition of eating problems involving weight, shape, and/or body image concerns.
- Food selectivity was the most commonly investigated feeding problem: 86% of studies investigated feeding problems involving selective intake, and in studies without comparison groups, rates were high (e.g., 62% showed food selectivity in Kerwin et al., 2005; 72% showed restricted variety in Schreck & Williams, 2006).
- Of 29 studies on selective eating, 69% (n = 20) also examined sensory sensitivities or food texture/temperature/smell/taste; most suggested food selectivity may be related to sensory impairments, with food texture identified as a strong contributing factor.
- No common individual characteristics were identified for youth who experience feeding or eating problems; findings on cognitive functioning, adaptive functioning, and autism traits were mixed, and preliminary evidence suggested autistic youth may be at higher risk for eating problems than peers without autism.
Methods
- Scoping review conducted and reported according to PRISMA, with systematic searches in MEDLINE, PsycINFO, and PubMed using population, age, and feeding/eating problem terms; searches were not date-restricted up to April 2020 and were limited to English, human-participant, peer-reviewed articles.
- Inclusion required empirical research with an objective measure of feeding or eating problems, separate data for autistic participants (or equivalent diagnoses), and samples of children/adolescents aged 18 years or under, or samples with 50% or more under 18 years; studies focused exclusively on medical issues, interventions for specific behaviors, case studies, and tool-development studies were excluded.
- The review included 34 studies, with a total sample of 4215 participants with autism; participants were recruited from community organizations, autism service organizations, and specialized clinics, and most studies (59%) were conducted in the United States.
Limitations
- The paper states that the search was limited to empirical studies using an objective measure of feeding or eating problems, which may have excluded qualitative studies and limited understanding of unmeasured issues such as parental approach to feeding and the parent–child feeding relationship.
- The paper states that variable terminology in the literature means some relevant empirical studies may have been inadvertently excluded, and that excluding studies of feeding/eating problems in the presence of another medical condition (e.g., gastrointestinal disorders, epilepsy) may make results less representative of the heterogeneous autistic youth population.
- Evident from the text: most included studies (88%) used cross-sectional designs and 88% relied on parent-reported data, only three studies examined eating problems involving weight/shape/body image, and the review found no common individual characteristics, limiting conclusions about development, maintenance, and remission of these problems.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
129 Not checked yet · 29 Own result · 20 No basis given · 19 Own interpretation · 5 Own method
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although differentiating “feeding” from “eating” problems is critical for accurate identification and treatment of these issues, the existing literature has failed to do so.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“No common individual characteristics (e.g. cognitive functioning and autism symptom severity) were identified for youth who experience feeding or eating problems.”
- Also stated in: § Lay abstract · plain
“We found no common characteristics (such as severity of autism symptoms) that best describe autistic youth who experience problems with feeding or eating.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Lay abstract · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“with almost all studies (91%) investigating feeding problems”
- Also stated in: § Lay abstract · plain
“Almost all studies we reviewed focused on problems with feeding (selective or picky eating)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Lay abstract · plain
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only 9% of studies examined concern with weight, shape, and/or body image”
- Also stated in: § Lay abstract · plain
“only a few studies focused on eating disorder symptoms (concern with weight, shape, and/or body image)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Also stated in: § Lay abstract · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“there is a limited understanding as to whether such problems should be attributed to an individual’s autism or whether an additional diagnosis is warranted.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The total sample of participants with autism was 4215.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“no consensus has been established for how to assess for eating problems in this population.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“psychotherapeutic treatment options that adequately address an autistic person’s eating problems are extremely limited.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A few studies reported no or marginal differences in food selectivity between youth with autism and controls.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Some studies used the term “feeding problems” to describe a range of problematic behaviors that occur in the mealtime context (e.g. Aponte & Romanczyk, 2016; Johnson et al., 2014)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Conceptualization of feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aponte & Romanczyk, 2016
- Not checked yetcites Johnson et al., 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the combination of increased ASD traits and increased FN was linked with increased BMI.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wallace et al. (2018)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Significant relationship between foods accepted and age for ASD group.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Suarez (2017)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, most studies reported greater food selectivity in autism groups.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Others used the term “eating problems” to describe pathology related to restricted eating (i.e. failing to gain weight and perceived fear of gaining weight; Råstam et al., 2013).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Conceptualization of feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Råstam et al., 2013 source
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“91% of included studies examined “feeding” rather than “eating” problems.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“no clear differentiation was presented in the literature.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Conceptualization of feeding and eating problems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“No relationship between foods accepted and ASD symptom severity.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Suarez (2017)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only three studies (9%) examined constructs that fit our definition of eating problems.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“86% of studies investigated feeding problems involving selective intake.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most often, the terms “feeding” and “eating” problems were used interchangeably to describe a number of related issues.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Conceptualization of feeding and eating problems
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In the studies without comparison groups, rates of food selectivity in samples of autistic youth were strikingly high”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Subclinical associations found between FN and ASD traits.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wallace et al. (2018)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Children with ASD accepted significantly fewer foods total and fewer foods from each group compared to controls, except snack foods.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Suarez (2017)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Children with ASD had more FN than peers.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wallace et al. (2018)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, most studies that compared groups of youth with autism to groups with other disorders and/or typical development found autistic individuals had higher rates of food selectivity.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Children with ASD accepted significantly fewer foods total and fewer foods from each group compared to controls, except snack foods.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Suarez (2017)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Likewise, three other studies found autism symptom severity was not significantly related to feeding or eating problems (Schreck & Williams, 2006; Sharp et al., 2013; Suarez, 2017).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck & Williams, 2006
- Not checked yetcites Sharp et al., 2013
- Not checked yetcites Suarez, 2017
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most (n = 15) examining sensory sensitivity and limited food intake utilized a broad measure of sensitivity (i.e. overall sensory impairment score or more focused but representative score, such as overall oral sensitivity).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plainn = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Conversely, the remaining three studies had younger participants (aged 2–12 years) and found no significant relation between feeding and eating problems and measures of adaptive functioning (Martins et al., 2008; Peverill et al., 2019; Postorino et al., 2015).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Martins et al., 2008
- Not checked yetcites Peverill et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Postorino et al., 2015
plainn = 3- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“For instance, two studies (Emond et al., 2010; Kerwin et al., 2005) used author-created measures to assess feeding behaviors”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Emond et al., 2010
- Not checked yetcites Kerwin et al., 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“it should be noted that most of these studies did not use standardized measures to assess for symptoms of pica.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four studies examined symptoms of pica in youth with autism.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Kuschner and colleagues (2015) found that in a sample of adolescents and young adults with autism, those with food neophobia received significantly lower parent ratings of daily living skills, but scores of social and communication skills did not significantly differ from their peers with autism and without food neophobia.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kuschner and colleagues (2015)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Six studies support a relation between ritualistic behaviors and food selectivity.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the 29 studies that investigated selective eating, 69% (n = 20) also examined the presence of sensory sensitivities or aspects of food texture, temperature, smell, or taste in relation to food selectivity.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plainn = 20- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, mixed results were found in the studies examining the relation between feeding and eating problems and adaptive functioning (n = 4).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
plaincorrelationaln = 4- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In three studies, authors used the comparison score of the Autism Diagnostic Observation Schedule–Second Edition (ADOS-2) as a measure of autism symptom severity and found no significant associations between feeding or eating behaviors and more autism symptoms (Bitsika & Sharpley, 2018; Johnson et al., 2014; Peverill et al., 2019).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bitsika & Sharpley, 2018
- Not checked yetcites Johnson et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Peverill et al., 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In general, these studies suggested food selectivity may be related to sensory impairments”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
hedgedcorrelationaln = 15- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Laboratory mealtime observations demonstrated similar findings.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“while Mayes and Zickgraf (2019) used a validated measure along with additional qualitative information to characterize the feeding problems (e.g. inedible substances consumed).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes and Zickgraf (2019)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Kuschner and colleagues (2015) found that in a sample of adolescents and young adults with autism, those with food neophobia received significantly lower parent ratings of daily living skills, but scores of social and communication skills did not significantly differ from their peers with autism and without food neophobia.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kuschner and colleagues (2015)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Similarly, a few studies included scores from measures of adaptive functioning and autism symptom severity in their analyses.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While many more studies reported scores from measures of autism traits in relation to feeding or eating problems, results across studies were evenly split between evidence for and against an association.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies indicated that food selectivity was a pervasive issue among their samples of autistic youth.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Conclusion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, most participants from studies that reported cognitive ability had IQs of 70 or higher, so results may not extend to individuals with lower cognitive functioning.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although only a handful of studies examined the relation between adaptive functioning and feeding or eating problems, the one study (Kuschner et al., 2015) that provided support for a negative relation (i.e. poor adaptive functioning skills associated with more feeding issues) had a much older sample than the others.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Consistent with previous reports (e.g. Twachtman-Reilly et al., 2008), the present review identified food selectivity as the most common feeding issue autistic youth experience.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Twachtman-Reilly et al., 2008
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Despite inconsistent terminology to describe the specific feeding and eating problems autistic youth may experience, there is clear evidence that such issues are common in this population.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Conclusion
boosted- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although only a handful of studies examined the relation between adaptive functioning and feeding or eating problems, the one study (Kuschner et al., 2015) that provided support for a negative relation (i.e. poor adaptive functioning skills associated with more feeding issues) had a much older sample than the others.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kuschner et al., 2015
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given that most research in this area has used cross-sectional designs, factors that influence the development and maintenance of feeding and eating problems are unknown.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While some evidence suggests that disordered eating behaviors are present in youth with autism, research on body image in relation to disordered eating in this population is non-existent, despite body image disturbance being an important feature of AN and BN (APA, 2013).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While many more studies reported scores from measures of autism traits in relation to feeding or eating problems, results across studies were evenly split between evidence for and against an association.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the few studies that reported mean scores of cognitive functioning, there was marked variability across samples, meaning results cannot be directly compared.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Our finding that only three studies have examined cognitive concerns related to weight, shape, and/or body image in youth with autism highlights the paucity of research in this area.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While some evidence suggests that disordered eating behaviors are present in youth with autism, research on body image in relation to disordered eating in this population is non-existent, despite body image disturbance being an important feature of AN and BN (APA, 2013).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Another issue identified in the current review that spans feeding and eating disorders is eating rituals commonly experienced by autistic individuals.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“However, Postorino and colleagues (2015) used several measures to assess autism symptom severity and found those with food selectivity scored significantly higher on the Social Responsiveness Scale (Constantino, 2005) and Social Communication Questionnaire (Rutter et al., 2003).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino and colleagues (2015)
- Not checked yetcites Constantino, 2005
- Not checked yetcites Rutter et al., 2003
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Feeding and eating problems are pervasive problems that affect persons with autism across all ages and cognitive abilities (Råstam, 2008; Vissoker et al., 2015).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract > Lay abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Råstam, 2008
- Not checked yetcites Vissoker et al., 2015
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Such high rates of varied eating and feeding problems suggest the difficulties related to eating that autistic youth experience may be complex, pervasive, and heterogeneous in nature.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract > Lay abstract
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“When issues such as mealtime behaviors, fear of trying new foods, and eating problems associated with medical disorders (e.g. gastrointestinal disorders) are considered, rates of eating and feeding problems in autistic youth are likely even higher.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract > Lay abstract
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, in their sample of 1462 youth, Mayes and Zickgraf (2019) found atypical eating behaviors (e.g. limited food preferences and brand-specific preferences) occur much more often in autistic children (70.4%) compared to children with other disorders (13.1%) and children in the general population (4.8%).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract > Lay abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes and Zickgraf (2019)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“existing literature has focused on a broad range of difficulties, including feeding problems, mealtime behaviors, and picky eating.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“All FS children showed at least one sensory factor linked to FS”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino et al. (2015)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Children in FS group had significantly higher ASD symptoms and significantly lower cognitive functioning vs no FS group.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino et al. (2015)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“92% of parents of children with FS observed food refusal in their child.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino et al. (2015)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In laboratory observation, FS was associated negatively with children’s acceptance of bites (i.e. food offered) and positively with mealtime behavior.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sharp et al. (2013)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Increased FS was positively correlated with problem behaviors during the observation”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sharp et al. (2013)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Autism group showed higher feeding problems, refused more foods, were more likely to require specific utensils/food presentations, and had preference for low texture foods vs controls.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck et al. (2004)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Children ate only a small variety of presented foods.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck & Williams (2006)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Autism group showed higher feeding problems, refused more foods, were more likely to require specific utensils/food presentations, and had preference for low texture foods vs controls.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck et al. (2004)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Prevalence of eating problems was significantly higher in children with ADHD and/or ASD.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Råstam et al. (2013) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Feeding or eating problems commonly present early in development; often even before concerns related to autism are identified (Emond et al., 2010).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Emond et al., 2010
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“ASD symptom severity was unrelated to feeding data.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sharp et al. (2013)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“No change in FS level across time-points.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Suarez et al. (2014)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Restricted variety was primarily related to food presentation (e.g. utensils and food items touching on plate).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck & Williams (2006)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“both disorders are thought to be over-represented in persons with autism (Chial et al., 2003; Matson et al., 2011; Råstam, 2008).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Eating and feeding disorders
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Chial et al., 2003
- Not checked yetcites Matson et al., 2011
- Not checked yetcites Råstam, 2008
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“In laboratory observation, FS was associated negatively with children’s acceptance of bites (i.e. food offered) and positively with mealtime behavior.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sharp et al. (2013)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“41% showed two sensory factors”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino et al. (2015)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Autism group showed higher feeding problems, refused more foods, were more likely to require specific utensils/food presentations, and had preference for low texture foods vs controls.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck et al. (2004)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Research on eating behaviors in persons with autism is relatively limited (Råstam, 2008)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Råstam, 2008
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“eating problems are likely often misattributed to the individual’s autism traits (Mayes et al., 2018).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes et al., 2018
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“impulsivity and activity problems were associated with eating problems in boys”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Råstam et al. (2013) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“72% of autistic children ate a narrow variety of foods.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck et al. (2004)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Autism group showed higher feeding problems, refused more foods, were more likely to require specific utensils/food presentations, and had preference for low texture foods vs controls.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck et al. (2004)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Children in FS group had significantly higher ASD symptoms and significantly lower cognitive functioning vs no FS group.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino et al. (2015)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Without treatment, the feeding problems autistic children experience tend to persist into late childhood (Suarez et al., 2014)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Suarez et al., 2014
plainconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“impulsivity and activity problems were associated with eating problems in boys”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Råstam et al. (2013) source
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Social interaction problems were strongly associated with eating problems in girls”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Råstam et al. (2013) source
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Specifically, Bitsika and Sharpley (2018) found approximately 11% of 52 young females with autism endorsed severe eating disturbances (i.e. purging, dieting, and fasting behaviors).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bitsika and Sharpley (2018)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“the number of foods eaten did not increase”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bandini et al. (2017)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“They found that while food refusal improved over time”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bandini et al. (2017)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“but the same trend was not observed in children and adolescents without autism.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Beighley and colleagues (2013)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, results of the four studies examining selective eating over time suggest variability in patterns of selective eating.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“with limited food preferences being the most common atypical eating behavior.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes and Zickgraf (2019)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“moderate and declining (39%)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peverill et al. (2019)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Suarez and colleagues (2014) found no change in food selectivity in children with autism over a 2-year period.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Suarez and colleagues (2014)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“For example, Kalyva (2009) found adolescent females with Asperger’s syndrome were at a significantly higher risk for eating problems compared to age- and body mass index (BMI)-matched peers without Asperger’s syndrome.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kalyva (2009)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Taken together, although the proportion of studies examining eating problems in autistic youth is small, preliminary evidence suggests persons with autism may be at higher risk for developing eating problems compared to persons without autism.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“less severe and stable (26%)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peverill et al. (2019)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“72% showed restricted variety”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck & Williams, 2006
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“very severe and stable (8%)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peverill et al. (2019)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“and 15 times more common in the autism group than their typical developing peers”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes and Zickgraf (2019)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Mayes and Zickgraf (2019) found atypical eating behaviors (e.g. limited food preferences, texture sensitivity, and brand-specific preferences) were five times more common in youth with autism than children with other disorders (e.g. ADHD, intellectual disability, language disorder, and learning disability)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes and Zickgraf (2019)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“57% showed food refusal in Schreck & Williams, 2006”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck & Williams, 2006
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“62% showed food selectivity in Kerwin et al., 2005”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kerwin et al., 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“severe and declining (27%)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peverill et al. (2019)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“autistic children aged 2–12 years were only marginally more likely to exhibit picky eating behavior when compared to age- and gender-matched siblings and children without autism (Martins et al., 2008).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Martins et al., 2008
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“with taste and color identified as influential (Hubbard et al., 2014; Nadon et al., 2011; Postorino et al., 2015).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hubbard et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Nadon et al., 2011
- Not checked yetcites Postorino et al., 2015
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“although two (Aponte & Romanczyk, 2016; Schreck & Williams, 2006) found no relation between food selectivity and sensory impairments.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Aponte & Romanczyk, 2016
- Not checked yetcites Schreck & Williams, 2006
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Specifically, smoother, consistent textures (e.g. hotdogs) were more likely to be accepted than lumpy/inconsistent textures (e.g. pureed beans).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sharp and colleagues (2013)
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“while nearly 4% had unspecified eating rituals.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino and colleagues (2015)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Sharp and colleagues (2013) found approximately half their sample of autistic children aged 3–8 years demonstrated selective patterns of eating by type and/or texture.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sharp and colleagues (2013)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Specific presentation of food was identified repeatedly as the most common eating ritual (Diolordi et al., 2014; Schreck & Williams, 2006; Williams et al., 2005).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Diolordi et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Schreck & Williams, 2006
- Not checked yetcites Williams et al., 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Although Martins et al. (2008) found no difference in eating rituals between autistic children and their siblings without autism”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Martins et al. (2008)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Food selectivity was also linked to more than one sensory factor (Postorino et al., 2015)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino et al., 2015
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Several studies found youth with autism had more ritualistic and/or idiosyncratic eating behaviors (e.g. requiring specific presentation of food, and use of certain utensils) than youth with other disabilities (e.g. ADHD, intellectual disability, and language disorder; Mayes & Zickgraf, 2019; Williams et al., 2005)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes & Zickgraf, 2019
- Not checked yetcites Williams et al., 2005
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Postorino and colleagues (2015) found nearly 13% of autistic children refused food because of brand or packaging”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino and colleagues (2015)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“and general population peers (Diolordi et al., 2014; Mayes & Zickgraf, 2019; Williams et al., 2005).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Diolordi et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Mayes & Zickgraf, 2019
- Not checked yetcites Williams et al., 2005
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Of note, only Bitsika and Sharpley (2018) restricted their sample to adolescents with higher cognitive abilities (IQ ⩾70)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bitsika and Sharpley (2018)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“which, as outlined above, have strong associations with food selectivity.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“In survey-based studies, researchers found that food textures are the primary reason for food refusal in autistic youth (Hubbard et al., 2014; Mayes & Zickgraf, 2019; Nadon et al., 2011).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Hubbard et al., 2014
- Not checked yetcites Mayes & Zickgraf, 2019
- Not checked yetcites Nadon et al., 2011
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Finally, Kerwin and colleagues (2005) found almost 30% of their sample of autistic children had symptoms of pica.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kerwin and colleagues (2005)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“just one (Postorino et al., 2015) reported a significant association between IQ and feeding problems, where lower IQ was related to higher levels of food selectivity.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino et al., 2015
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Emond and colleagues (2010) found autistic children were markedly more likely than controls to show pica behavior at 38 and 54 months old.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Emond and colleagues (2010)
boostedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While results suggest pica may occur at higher rates in youth with autism compared to their peers”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Conversely, Mayes and Zickgraf (2019) found that autistic youth with and without an intellectual disability did not differ in their rates of atypical eating behaviors.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes and Zickgraf (2019)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Similarly, others found no differences in feeding or eating problems based on IQ (Bitsika & Sharpley, 2018; Johnson et al., 2014).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bitsika & Sharpley, 2018
- Not checked yetcites Johnson et al., 2014
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“they found greater sensory impairment was associated with more ritualistic eating behaviors”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Martins et al. (2008)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Similar results were found in an older sample, where those with autism had significantly higher rates of eating unspecified non-food items (Matson et al., 2009).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matson et al. (2009)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Mayes and Zickgraf (2019) also found relatively high rates of pica, with nearly 12% of their large sample of autistic youth showing pica symptoms versus none in comparison groups.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes and Zickgraf (2019)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Given that most research in this area has used cross-sectional designs, factors that influence the development and maintenance of feeding and eating problems are unknown.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Rests on an assumption: Cross-sectional designs cannot identify factors that influence the development and maintenance of a condition.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Only a few studies examined eating problems, but they suggested that youth with autism may be at higher risk than others for developing eating problems.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the relation of autism to feeding and eating problems is not fully understood, extant literature suggests that such problems affect a substantial number of persons with autism.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although only a small proportion of studies included examined eating problems, results suggest that youth with autism may be at higher risk for developing disordered eating than their peers.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, because we excluded investigations of feeding and eating problems in the presence of another medical condition (e.g. gastrointestinal disorders and epilepsy), our results may not be representative of the full breadth of feeding and eating problems that occur in the heterogeneous population of autistic youth.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Limitations
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“These variable findings are likely in part attributable to sample differences (e.g. differing age ranges and diagnoses such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) vs”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The presentation and occurrence of feeding and eating problems are likely affected by factors including age, sex, gender, cognitive and adaptive functioning, and severity of autism traits.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Conclusion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: unclear — It is unclear why the paper says it holds.
In the paper
“As children age, increased emphasis is placed on eating within a broader social context (e.g. eating with friends or peers; Stok et al., 2015).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Clinical implications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Stok et al., 2015
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“In addition, most participants from studies that reported cognitive ability had IQs of 70 or higher, so results may not extend to individuals with lower cognitive functioning.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Relatedly, because we did not include studies exclusively examining mealtime behaviors, an understanding of the context in which the feeding and eating problems occur was limited.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Limitations
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Of the few studies that reported mean scores of cognitive functioning, there was marked variability across samples, meaning results cannot be directly compared.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“This specific result suggests it is possible that food selectivity problems are only reflected in adaptive functioning scores as children with autism get older.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“Recently, Folta et al. (2020) found that many autistic youth reported a range of strategies to cope with feeding problems in the social context”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Clinical implications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Folta et al. (2020)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Behaviorally based interventions, including cognitive behavioral techniques, have been shown to effectively treat youth with food selectivity (Dumont et al., 2019; Lukens & Silverman, 2014)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Clinical implications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Dumont et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Lukens & Silverman, 2014
boosteddirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Our results are bolstered by rapidly accumulating research suggesting a potential overlap between autism and AN in adults (e.g. Karjalainen et al., 2019; Westwood et al., 2018; Westwood & Tchanturia, 2017 provide a comprehensive review in adults).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Karjalainen et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Westwood et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Westwood & Tchanturia, 2017
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
In the paper
“whereas family-based treatment (FBT), previously known as the Maudsley family therapy, has accumulated the most evidence of efficacy for adolescents with eating disorders such as AN or BN (Lock, 2015).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Clinical implications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Lock, 2015
plaindirect- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
- Probably not a substantial claim. 29
- It may state two separate claims as one. 31
- The quote only partly states this claim. 4
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Thirty-four studies were included in the current review”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“We included 34 studies in our review”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Many studies used the terms “feeding” and “eating” problems interchangeably”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract > Lay abstract
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“22 studies appearing to use original data sets and 12 reporting secondary data analysis.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“to our knowledge, no studies have examined whether these feeding problems precede eating problems in autistic youth.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: fails — The paper may give no reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The paper may give no reason why it holds.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies (88%) relied on parent-reported data; a small number (9%) combined parent- and self-report, and a single study (3%) relied solely on observational data.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Nearly, all studies (88%) used a cross-sectional design, although some (12%) collected data across multiple time-points.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participant age ranged from 2 to 28 years, although the majority focused on children 8 years of age or younger.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The earliest study was published in 2004, and over half (56%) were published from 2013 to 2017.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most studies (59%) were conducted in the United States, with some completed in Australia (9%), as well as Italy, England, and Canada (6% each).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Participants were recruited from a variety of sources (e.g. community organizations, autism service organizations, and specialized clinics).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most literature to date has examined the presence of autism symptoms in individuals with AN, and a few studies have examined the reverse relation.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Most literature to date examining eating disorders in persons with autism has been conducted predominately with adults, whereas picky eating and feeding disorders have been investigated in children and youth.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Autistic children had more mealtime behaviors related to insistence on sameness (e.g. utensils and food preparation methods).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams et al. (2005)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“Higher FN was associated with lower BMI”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Wallace et al. (2018)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
In the paper
“whereas others referred to such issues as “eating problems” (e.g. Kerwin et al., 2005).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Conceptualization of feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kerwin et al., 2005
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“No significant differences between groups on types of food consumed or liquid intake.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Williams et al. (2005)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
The quote only partly states this claim.
The paper states this without a source or data behind it here, so there is nothing to check it against. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Four studies examined patterns of food selectivity across time and produced mixed results.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Finally, one-third of studies (n = 12) examined feeding or eating problems and autism traits, with split results.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
plainn = 12- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A result the paper reports from its own data — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although most studies included a measure of cognitive functioning within their protocols, only four studies examined the relation between feeding/eating problems and cognitive functioning.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“Five studies characterized specific aspects of sensory processing and produced comparable results.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Although only a handful of studies examined the relation between adaptive functioning and feeding or eating problems, the one study (Kuschner et al., 2015) that provided support for a negative relation (i.e. poor adaptive functioning skills associated with more feeding issues) had a much older sample than the others.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kuschner et al., 2015
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. The quote only partly states this claim.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“a key difference between the two categories of disorders involves the individual’s cognitive appraisal of their appearance or body image concerns.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract > Lay abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Claudino et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Kennedy et al., 2018
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“a commonly accepted definition is “Severe disruptions in nutritional and caloric intake exceeding ordinary variations in hunger, food preference, and/or interest in eating” (Sharp et al., 2017, p. 116).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract > Lay abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Sharp et al., 2017
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“the most recent version of Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th ed.; DSM-5; APA, 2013) combined problems related to feeding and eating into one comprehensive chapter”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract > Lay abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites APA, 2013
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“To date, no formal definition for feeding disorders has been established (Kennedy et al., 2018)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract > Lay abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kennedy et al., 2018
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Westwood and colleagues (2018) found an overrepresentation of autism symptoms in adolescent females with severe AN, with 10% of their sample meeting full criteria for autism and an additional 40% who were below cut-off but presented with symptoms.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Westwood et al., 2018
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“eating disorders involve varying degrees of preoccupation with food, body weight, and/or shape, whereas in feeding disorders, the motivation may be a combination of other reasons”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Abstract > Lay abstract
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Claudino et al., 2019
- Not checked yetcites Kennedy et al., 2018
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The review was conducted and reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA; Moher et al., 2009)”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Methods > Search strategy and selection criteria
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Moher et al., 2009
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“There was a stable, significant relationship between FS and sensory over-responsivity”
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
“children with higher sensory sensitivities also had higher FS.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Suarez et al. (2014)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
- Also stated in: § Results · plain
In the paper
“Having a neurodevelopmental condition such as autism may increase the likelihood of developing eating problems, although this relation is poorly understood (Mayes et al., 2018).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Feeding and eating problems in persons with autism
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes et al., 2018
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“23% showed three sensory factors”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Postorino et al. (2015)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Selectivity was not related to autism symptoms.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Schreck & Williams (2006)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Specifically, participants with Asperger’s syndrome self-reported significantly more BN symptoms, food preoccupation, oral control, and overall eating problems.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kalyva (2009)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“The same differences between groups were seen in parent-reported eating problems, but mothers of adolescents with Asperger’s syndrome also indicated their daughters had significantly more dieting behaviors.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kalyva (2009)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Beighley and colleagues (2013) found a general trend of decreased food selectivity as children with autism got older”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Beighley and colleagues (2013)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“suggesting that the decrease in overall selectivity may be better attributed to a decrease in caregivers offering non-preferred foods (Bandini et al., 2017).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bandini et al. (2017)
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Matson et al. (2009) found autistic youth showed significantly higher rates of feeding problems compared to typically and atypically developing groups (i.e. developmental disability other than autism), especially with food selectivity.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Matson et al. (2009)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“although Castro and colleagues (2016) found autistic youth (aged 4–16 years) differed from matched general population controls on overall levels of problematic eating behavior, groups did not significantly differ in their picky eating symptoms.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Castro and colleagues (2016)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Authors concluded that, like general population children, most feeding problems remitted over time, although a small group of preschoolers with autism continued to show chronic feeding problems into school age.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Peverill et al. (2019)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Similarly, in a large population-based study, Råstam and colleagues (2013) found the prevalence of restrictive eating problems (consistent with a diagnosis of AN) was significantly higher for children (aged 9 and 12 years) with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and/or autism, with the highest rates seen in girls with co-occurring ADHD and autism.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Råstam and colleagues (2013)
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“The trajectory of selective eating is likely heterogeneous and complicated by other feeding/eating problems the child may be experiencing, including general mealtime behaviors and rituals around eating.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“Specifically, smooth creamy textures (e.g. mashed potatoes), foods that require chewing (e.g. unprocessed meat), and foods with lumps (e.g. oatmeal) were identified as problematic (Mayes & Zickgraf, 2019).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes & Zickgraf, 2019
plaincorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Together, studies that employed more rigorous measures of sensory sensitivity suggest an association between sensory sensitivity and food selectivity, with food texture representing a strong contributing factor.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Commonly investigated feeding and eating problems
hedgedcorrelational- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“and Mayes and Zickgraf (2019) reported 70% of their sample had an IQ of ⩾80.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Mayes and Zickgraf (2019)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“although Johnson et al. (2014) reported 63% of their sample had an IQ of ⩾70”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results > Characteristics of persons with autism and feeding or eating problems
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Johnson et al. (2014)
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
None of the sources cited for this claim have been checked yet.
In the paper
“A similar argument has been made with respect to whether ARFID best represents a feeding or eating disorder (Kennedy et al., 2018; Sharp & Stubbs, 2019).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Kennedy et al., 2018
- Not checked yetcites Sharp & Stubbs, 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“This multi-informant, semi-structured interview considers different rationales for food restriction (e.g. sensory sensitivity, lack of interest in eating, and fear of negative consequences), which can be used to guide appropriate treatment approaches.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Clinical implications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bryant-Waugh et al., 2019
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
In the paper
“A recently developed, freely available measure that may prove helpful for assessment and treatment planning of feeding and eating problems is the Pica, ARFID, and Rumination Disorder Interview (PARDI; Bryant-Waugh et al., 2019).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Clinical implications
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Bryant-Waugh et al., 2019
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Although the PARDI has not yet been used in samples of youth with autism, it appears promising for use in this population based on the content and structure of the measure.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Clinical implications
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
In the paper
“Many children without autism demonstrate food selectivity; however, such problems are typically transient and, to some extent, considered developmentally appropriate (Samuel et al., 2018).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Samuel et al., 2018
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“Many children without autism demonstrate food selectivity; however, such problems are typically transient and, to some extent, considered developmentally appropriate (Samuel et al., 2018).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites Samuel et al., 2018
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: unclear — It is unclear whether the paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“While using objective measures is important to characterize behaviors, valuable information on unmeasured related issues (e.g. parental approach to feeding and parent–child feeding relationship) could not be fully understood.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Limitations
hedged- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. It may state two separate claims as one.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“Second, given the variable terminology in the literature, it is possible that, despite our efforts to be inclusive, some relevant empirical studies may have been inadvertently excluded.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Limitations
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: fails — The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim. The paper’s conclusions may not depend on it.
In the paper
“While some evidence suggests that disordered eating behaviors are present in youth with autism, research on body image in relation to disordered eating in this population is non-existent, despite body image disturbance being an important feature of AN and BN (APA, 2013).”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
What the sources say
- Not checked yetcites APA, 2013
plain- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
Probably not a substantial claim.
What the paper did — it cites no source for this, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“First, our search was limited to empirical studies that used an objective measure of feeding or eating problems, and so may have excluded qualitative studies examining this topic.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion > Limitations
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
A conclusion the paper draws from its own results — it cites no other source for it, so there is none to check. The quote shows it is in the paper.
In the paper
“findings are likely in part attributable to sample differences (e.g. differing age ranges and diagnoses such as autism spectrum disorder (ASD) vs PDD-NOS) as well as the various measures used to assess symptoms, which have differing levels of psychometric evidence.”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Discussion
hedgedconditional- Asserted: passes — The authors put it forward as true.
- Checkable: passes — It can be checked against evidence.
- Load-bearing: passes — The paper’s conclusions depend on it.
- Based: passes — The paper gives a reason why it holds.
It may state two separate claims as one.
The paper relies on this without support.
Differentiating “feeding” from “eating” problems is critical for accurate identification and treatment of these issues.
“Although differentiating “feeding” from “eating” problems is critical for accurate identification and treatment of these issues, the existing literature has failed to do so.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Understanding the difference between “feeding” and “eating” problems is important for researchers to be consistent and for proper identification and treatment.
“Many studies used the terms “feeding” and “eating” problems interchangeably, but understanding the difference between these problems is important for researchers to be consistent, as well as for proper identification and treatment.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Cross-sectional designs cannot identify factors that influence the development and maintenance of a condition.
“Given that most research in this area has used cross-sectional designs, factors that influence the development and maintenance of feeding and eating problems are unknown.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The PARDI has not yet been used in samples of youth with autism.
“Although the PARDI has not yet been used in samples of youth with autism, it appears promising for use in this population based on the content and structure of the measure.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Limited research exists on the efficacy of treatments for youth with co-occurring autism and feeding or eating disorders.
“Limited research exists on the efficacy of treatments for youth with co-occurring autism and feeding or eating disorders; however, the presence of autism has been suggested to contribute to the resistance to conventional therapies (Wallier et al., 2009).”
The paper relies on this without support.
No eating disorder treatments modified for autistic youth currently exist.
“In addition, to our knowledge, no eating disorder treatments modified for autistic youth currently exist.”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“These eating difficulties are frequently influenced by behavioral rigidity (difficulty in adapting to changes in routine, environment, or expectations, leading to repetitive and restricted behaviors [9]), sensory sensitivities, and anxiety—key characteristics of ASD [10].”
From Unraveling the Connections: Eating Issues, Microbiome, and Gastrointestinal Symptoms in Autism Spectrum Disorder (2025) · cites this paper as [10]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“| Matson et al. (2009) | 114 | Autism (72), PDD-NOS (40). Sex: 66% male |”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
Reported 114 · recomputed 112
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“| Schreck & Williams (2006) | 138 | Autism (100), PDD-NOS (47), AS(29). Sex: 88% male |”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
Reported 138 · recomputed 176
Rated minor: it would not touch a result — a value no result rests on, a p-value that stays on the same side of the significance level, or a conflict that is clerical, resolved elsewhere in the paper, or outside its own findings.
In the paper
“| Johnson et al. (2014) | 256 | Autism (174), AS (21), PDD-NOS (57). Sex: 84% male |”
§ Feeding and eating problems in children and adolescents with autism: A scoping review > Results
Reported 256 · recomputed 252
Citations
Cites
1 retracted
Beighley, J. S., Matson, J. L., Rieske, R. D., & Adams, H. L. (2013) · Research in Developmental Disabilities · doi:10.1016/j.ridd.2013.07.026 · Cited by 77
RetractedDiagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders
American Psychiatric Association (2013) · doi:10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 · Cited by 116,369
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: the PRISMA statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & for the PRISMA Group (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b2535 · Cited by 83,823
Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., Altman, D. G., & The PRISMA Group (2009) · PLoS Medicine · doi:10.1371/journal.pmed.1000097 · Cited by 64,042
Wang, G., Ma, R., Qiao, G., Wada, K., Aizawa, Y., & Satoh, T. (2015) · Integrative Medicine International · doi:10.1159/000368408 · Cited by 18,762
Genetics of Food Intake Self-Regulation in Childhood: Literature Review and Research Opportunities
Faith, M. S., Carnell, S., & Kral, T. V. E. (2013) · Human Heredity · doi:10.1159/000353879 · Cited by 7,633
The Eating Attitudes Test: psychometric features and clinical correlates
Garner, D. M., Olmsted, M., Bohr, Y., & Garfinkel, P. (1982) · Psychological Medicine · doi:10.1017/s0033291700049163 · Cited by 4,902
Toward objective classification of childhood autism: Childhood Autism Rating Scale (CARS)
Schopler, E., Reichler, R. J., DeVellis, R. F., & Daly, K. (1980) · Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders · doi:10.1007/bf02408436 · Cited by 2,432
Development of a scale to measure the trait of food neophobia in humans
Pliner, P., & Hobden, K. (1992) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/0195-6663(92)90014-w · Cited by 2,137
Development of the Children’s Eating Behaviour Questionnaire
Wardle, J., Guthrie, C. A., Sanderson, S., & Rapoport, L. (2001) · Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry · doi:10.1111/1469-7610.00792 · Cited by 1,747
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Constantino J. N., 2005, The Social Responsiveness Scale (SRS)
- Guenther P. M., 2006, Healthy Eating Index-2005
- Matson J. L., 2007, Autism spectrum disorders–comorbidity–child version
- Råstam M., 2008, Clinical Neuropsychiatry: Journal of Treatment Evaluation, 5, 31
- Rutter M., 2003, Manual for the Social Communication Questionnaire
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Bourne, L., Mandy, W., & Bryant‐Waugh, R. (2022) · Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology · doi:10.1111/dmcn.15139 · Cited by 110
Sensory Processing and Eating Behaviours in Autism: A Systematic Review
Nimbley, E., Golds, L., Sharpe, H., Gillespie‐Smith, K., & Duffy, F. (2022) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.2920 · Cited by 93
Valenzuela-Zamora, A. F., Ramírez-Valenzuela, D. G., & Ramos-Jiménez, A. (2022) · Nutrients · doi:10.3390/nu14132660 · Cited by 78
“Food rejection is extremely common in children with ASD, although its true prevalence is not reported [22,30].”
BackgroundMental health challenges faced by autistic people
Lai, M. (2023) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-023-01718-2 · Cited by 88
A comparison of the eating disorder service experiences of autistic and non-autistic women in the UK
Babb, C., Brede, J., Jones, C. R. G., Serpell, L., Mandy, W., & Fox, J. (2022) · European Eating Disorders Review · doi:10.1002/erv.2930 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- Baraskewich, J., von Ranson, K. M., McCrimmon, A., & McMorris, C. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Calgary, Canada
- Corresponding author
- McMorris, Carly A
- Venue
- Autism
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-03-02
- Volume
- 25
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1505-1519
- ISSN
- 1362-3613 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7005
- PMC
- PMC8323334
- OpenAlex
- W3133881058
- Semantic Scholar
- 7ad36100a302500ee54277c43f06ca196c1d750b
- Cited by
- 221
- References
- 82
- Citations by year
- 2026: 37 · 2025: 62 · 2024: 60 · 2023: 41 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 2
- FWCI
- 5.45
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- Autism (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Child Nutrition and Feeding Issues
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Autism Spectrum Disorder Research
- Keywords
- feeding difficulties, picky eating, food avoidance, disordered eating, eating disorder symptoms, body image concern, insistence on sameness, food presentation, autistic youth, terminology distinction
- MeSH terms
- Problem Behavior, Autism Spectrum Disorder, Adolescent, Autistic Disorder, Body Image, Child, Feeding Behavior, Humans
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-10-10, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).
A second model labelled each claim on 2026-10-10 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
