The DOI matches its Crossref record; 48 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Algorithmic risk governance: Big data analytics, race and information activism in criminal justice debates
Abstract
Meanings of risk in criminal justice assessment continue to evolve, making it critical to understand how particular compositions of risk are mediated, resisted and re-configured by experts and practitioners. Criminal justice organizations are working with computer scientists, software engineers and private companies that are skilled in big data analytics to produce new ways of thinking about and managing risk. Little is known, however, about how criminal justice systems, social justice organizations and individuals are shaping, challenging and redefining conventional actuarial risk episteme(s) through the use of big data technologies. The use of such analytics is shifting organizational risk practices, challenging social science methods of assessing risk, producing new knowledge about risk and consequently new forms of algorithmic governance. This article explores how big data reconfigure risk by producing a new form of algorithmic risk—a form of risk which is posited as different from the social science (psychologically) informed risk techniques already in use in many justice sectors. It also shows that new experts are entering the risk game, including technologists who make data public and accessible to a range of stakeholders. Finally, it demonstrates that big data analytics can be used to produce forms of usable knowledge that constitute types of ‘information activism’. This form of activism produces alternative risk narratives, which are focused on ‘criminogenic structures’ or ‘criminogenic policy’.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Likewise, criminal courts use multiple predictive instruments, called”
From Technologies of Crime Prediction: The Reception of Algorithms in Policing and Criminal Courts (2021) · cites this paper as Hannah-Moffat 2018
In the citing paper
“These issues, nevertheless, are usually ignored with the result that the concept of 'risk' is routinely used to produce and justify a range of governmental approaches to dealing with Indigenous offenders (Hannah-Moffat, 2019).”
From Colonization, Normalization and Risk-Assessment: The Case of Youth Criminal Justice Act and Correctional Overrepresentation of Indigenous Youth in Canada (2025) · cites this paper as Hannah-Moffat, 2019
In the citing paper
“Overwhelmingly, the COMPAS dataset collected in Broward County [58] is used as evidence amongst our sources to suggest that ARA tools do or can exhibit biased and unfair performance when used in the real world.”
From Efficiency vs. Equity: A Structured Interdisciplinary Review of AI in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments (2026) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“Several products currently on the market purport to indicate neighborhoods that are more likely to experience crime [58].”
From Efficiency vs. Equity: A Structured Interdisciplinary Review of AI in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments (2026) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“More importantly, a large dataset of criminal defendants from 2013 to 2014 in Broward County, which was using COMPAS, was compiled using public record requests [58].”
From Efficiency vs. Equity: A Structured Interdisciplinary Review of AI in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments (2026) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“These analyses uncovered that COMPAS recommended 24% longer sentences for young defendants [35] and that COMPAS was more than twice as likely to incorrectly identify a black defendant as a future criminal as compared to a white defendant [58] although Northpoint, the company that developed COMPAS, has disputed claims of bias in COMPAS [58].”
From Efficiency vs. Equity: A Structured Interdisciplinary Review of AI in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments (2026) · cites this paper as [58]
In the citing paper
“These analyses uncovered that COMPAS recommended 24% longer sentences for young defendants [35] and that COMPAS was more than twice as likely to incorrectly identify a black defendant as a future criminal as compared to a white defendant [58] although Northpoint, the company that developed COMPAS, has disputed claims of bias in COMPAS [58].”
From Efficiency vs. Equity: A Structured Interdisciplinary Review of AI in Criminal Justice Risk Assessments (2026) · cites this paper as [58]
Citations
Cites
boyd, D., & Crawford, K. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.678878 · Cited by 5,479
Big data: a revolution that will transform how we live, work, and think
(2013) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.50-6804 · Cited by 3,657
Hacking, I. (1990) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511819766 · Cited by 3,585
Lazer, D., Pentland, A., Adamic, L., Aral, S., Barabási, A.-L., Brewer, D., Christakis, N., Contractor, N., Fowler, J., Gutmann, M., et al. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1167742 · Cited by 3,365
Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor
Lebovits, H. (2018) · Public Integrity · doi:10.1080/10999922.2018.1511671 · Cited by 3,320
THE LOGIC OF CONNECTIVE ACTION: Digital media and the personalization of contentious politics
Bennett, W. L., & Segerberg, A. (2012) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2012.670661 · Cited by 3,116
Fair prediction with disparate impact: a study of bias in recidivism prediction instruments
Chouldechova, A. (2017) · Big Data · doi:10.1089/big.2016.0047 · Cited by 2,159
The New Penology: Notes on the Emerging Strategy of Corrections and Its Implications
Feeley, M., & Simon, J. (1992) · Criminology · doi:10.1111/j.1745-9125.1992.tb01112.x · Cited by 2,109
The British Journal of Criminology
Bennett, T. H. (2017) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781315086613-24 · Cited by 1,970
Networks of outrage and hope: social movements in the internet age
Hands, J. (2013) · Information Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2013.829514 · Cited by 1,897
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Gitlin T, 2012, Occupy Nation: The Roots, the Spirit, and the Promise of Occupy Wall Street
- 10.1177/0959353504042178 · DOI
- Harcourt BE, 2007, Against Prediction
- Lohr S, 2013, New York Times, F1
- Lupton D, 2015, Digital Sociology
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Algorithms at Work: The New Contested Terrain of Control
Kellogg, K. C., Valentine, M. A., & Christin, A. (2020) · Academy of Management Annals · doi:10.5465/annals.2018.0174 · Cited by 2,732
Predict and Surveil: Data, Discretion, and the Future of Policing
Brayne, S. (2020) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190684099.001.0001 · Cited by 334
Technologies of Crime Prediction: The Reception of Algorithms in Policing and Criminal Courts
Brayne, S., & Christin, A. (2021) · Social Problems · doi:10.1093/socpro/spaa004 · Cited by 279
Algorithmic justice: Algorithms and big data in criminal justice settings
Završník, A. (2019) · European Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1177/1477370819876762 · Cited by 293
Artificial intelligence, bureaucratic form, and discretion in public service
Bullock, J., Young, M. M., & Wang, Y.-F. (2020) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-200223 · Cited by 139
Tan, S. Y., & Taeihagh, A. (2021) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2020.101546 · Cited by 125
Peeters, R. (2020) · Information Polity · doi:10.3233/ip-200253 · Cited by 78
Hamilton, M. (2019) · Behavioral Sciences & the Law · doi:10.1002/bsl.2406 · Cited by 67
Digital technologies for the Sustainable Development Goals
Hariyani, D., Hariyani, P., & Mishra, S. (2025) · Green Technologies and Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.grets.2025.100202 · Cited by 86
Egbert, S., & Mann, M. (2021) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-73276-9_2 · Cited by 61
Digital prediction technologies in the justice system: The implications of a ‘race-neutral’ agenda
Ugwudike, P. (2020) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480619896006 · Cited by 57
Digital Social Policy: Past, Present, Future
Henman, P. W. F. (2022) · Journal of Social Policy · doi:10.1017/s0047279422000162 · Cited by 61
Youth justice and racialization: Comparative reflections
Cunneen, C. (2019) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/1362480619889039 · Cited by 51
Egbert, S., & Leese, M. (2020) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780429328732 · Cited by 124
Between Care and Control: Examining Surveillance Practices in Harm Reduction
Michaud, L., van der Meulen, E., & Guţă, A. (2022) · Contemporary Drug Problems · doi:10.1177/00914509221128598 · Cited by 50
Werth, R. (2019) · Sociology Compass · doi:10.1111/soc4.12659 · Cited by 54
A Practical Framework for Considering the Use of Predictive Risk Modeling in Child Welfare
Drake, B., Jonson‐Reid, M., Ocampo, M. G., Morrison, M., & Dvalishvili, D. (2020) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/0002716220978200 · Cited by 40
Ugwudike, P. (2021) · AI and Ethics · doi:10.1007/s43681-021-00117-5 · Cited by 55
Manning, L., Brewer, S., Craigon, P. J., Frey, J. G., Gutiérrez, A., Jacobs, N. J., Kanza, S., Munday, S., Sacks, J., & Pearson, S. (2023) · Trends in Food Science & Technology · doi:10.1016/j.tifs.2023.01.015 · Cited by 37
Artificial Intelligence in Crime Counteraction, Prediction, Prevention and Evolution
Sukhodolov, A. P., & Бычкова, А. (2018) · Russian Journal of Criminology · doi:10.17150/2500-4255.2018.12(6).753-766 · Cited by 34
Technology and organised crime in the smart city: an ethnographic study of the illicit drug trade
Berry, M. (2018) · City Territory and Architecture · doi:10.1186/s40410-018-0091-7 · Cited by 33
Henne, K., & Troshynski, E. I. (2019) · Critical Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10612-019-09441-z · Cited by 32
Smart criminal justice: exploring the use of algorithms in the Swiss criminal justice system
Simmler, M., Brunner, S., Canova, G., & Schedler, K. (2022) · Artificial Intelligence and Law · doi:10.1007/s10506-022-09310-1 · Cited by 43
Rothschild‐Elyassi, G., Koehler, J., & Simon, J. S. (2018) · Wiley eBooks · doi:10.1002/9781119372394.ch14 · Cited by 31
Predictive Algorithms in Justice Systems and the Limits of Tech-Reformism
Ugwudike, P. (2022) · International Journal for Crime, Justice and Social Democracy · doi:10.5204/ijcjsd.2189 · Cited by 29
Fine, A., Berthelot, E. R., & Marsh, S. (2025) · Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.3390/bs15040476 · Cited by 45
Bail and Pretrial Justice in the United States: A Field of Possibility
Page, J., & Scott-Hayward, C. S. (2022) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-093024 · Cited by 28
Criminal Record Stigma and Surveillance in the Digital Age
Lageson, S. E. (2021) · Annual Review of Criminology · doi:10.1146/annurev-criminol-030920-092833 · Cited by 29
Injustice in the Justice System: Reforming Inequities for True “Justice for All”
Varghese, F. P., Israel, T., Seymour, G. O., Herbst, R. B., Suarez, L. G., & Hargons, C. N. (2019) · The Counseling Psychologist · doi:10.1177/0011000019892329 · Cited by 35
Searching for Extremist Content Online Using the Dark Crawler and Sentiment Analysis
Scrivens, R., Gaudette, T., Davies, G. J., & Frank, R. W. (2019) · Emerald Group Publishing Limited eBooks · doi:10.1108/s1521-613620190000024016 · Cited by 26
Challenging the Reductionism of “Evidence-Based” Youth Justice
Case, S. (2021) · Sustainability · doi:10.3390/su13041735 · Cited by 25
Big Data Characteristics (V’s) in Industry
Saeed, N. H., & Husamaldin, L. (2021) · Iraqi Journal of Industrial Research · doi:10.53523/ijoirvol8i1id52 · Cited by 25
Afzal, M. Y., & Panagiotopoulos, P. (2024) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2024.101977 · Cited by 43
Aysolmaz, B., İren, D., & Dau, N. (2020) · Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS) · doi:10.24251/hicss.2020.648 · Cited by 22
Reconnecting Youth: Beyond Individualized Programs and Risks
Myers, R., Goddard, T., & Davidtz, J. (2020) · Youth Justice · doi:10.1177/1473225420932861 · Cited by 21
The epistemology of algorithmic risk assessment and the path towards a non-penology penology
Mehozay, Y., & Fisher, E. (2018) · Punishment & Society · doi:10.1177/1462474518802336 · Cited by 20
Algorithmic tyranny: Psycho-Pass , science fiction and the criminological imagination
Wood, M. A. (2018) · Crime Media Culture An International Journal · doi:10.1177/1741659018774609 · Cited by 31
The veneers of empiricism: Gender, race and prison classification
Montford, K. S., & Hannah‐Moffat, K. (2020) · Aggression and Violent Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.avb.2020.101475 · Cited by 23
Self-citationAchieving Consistency in Sentencing
Harris, L. (2022) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192859266.001.0001 · Cited by 17
Seeking Liberation: Surveillance, Datafication, and Race
Crooks, R. N. (2022) · Surveillance & Society · doi:10.24908/ss.v20i4.15983 · Cited by 19
Governing Liberty Through Accountability: Surveillance Reporting as Technologies of Governmentality
Molnár, Á., & Warren, I. (2020) · Critical Criminology · doi:10.1007/s10612-020-09490-9 · Cited by 18
Big data policing: The use of big data and algorithms by the Netherlands Police
Schuilenburg, M. B., & Soudijn, M. R. J. (2023) · Policing A Journal of Policy and Practice · doi:10.1093/police/paad061 · Cited by 21
König, P. D., & Krafft, T. D. (2021) · Current Issues in Criminal Justice · doi:10.1080/10345329.2020.1849932 · Cited by 15
Collier, B., & Cowan, S. (2022) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639211061409 · Cited by 16
Datafizierte Polizeiarbeit – (Wissens-)Praktische Implikationen und rechtliche Herausforderungen
Egbert, S. (2020) · Edition Forschung und Entwicklung in der Strafrechtspflege · doi:10.1007/978-3-658-30727-1_4 · Cited by 14
Ahmad, F., & Monaghan, J. (2020) · Crime Law and Social Change · doi:10.1007/s10611-020-09909-y · Cited by 13
Castro-Toledo, F. J., Llinares, F. M., & Aguerri, J. C. (2023) · Criminal Law Forum · doi:10.1007/s10609-023-09454-y · Cited by 15
Evaluating algorithmic risk assessment
Hamilton, M. (2021) · New Criminal Law Review · doi:10.1525/nclr.2021.24.2.156 · Cited by 10
DoCarmo, T. E., Rea, S. C., Conaway, E., Emery, J. R., & Raval, N. (2021) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/lapo.12164 · Cited by 16
Digital government inclusion: Exploring strategies for inclusive government automation
Peeters, R., Miller, S. M., & Schuilenburg, M. B. (2025) · Government Information Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.giq.2025.102028 · Cited by 27
Arrigo, B. A., & Shaw, O. P. (2022) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/13624806221082318 · Cited by 11
Sensing probation in Canada: Notes on affect and penal aesthetics in risk assessment
Taylor, M. P. (2023) · European Journal of Probation · doi:10.1177/20662203231170688 · Cited by 11
Systemology of Information Law
Lovtsov, D. A. (2022) · Pravosudie / Justice · doi:10.37399/2686-9241.2022.1.41-70 · Cited by 10
Enacting criminal futures: data practices and crime prevention
Leese, M. (2022) · Policing & Society · doi:10.1080/10439463.2022.2112192 · Cited by 10
The views about Big Data among professionals of police forces: A scoping review of empirical studies
Neiva, L., Machado, H., & Silva, S. (2023) · International Journal of Police Science & Management · doi:10.1177/14613557231166225 · Cited by 12
Rothschild‐Elyassi, G. (2021) · Law & Social Inquiry · doi:10.1017/lsi.2021.10 · Cited by 9
Racial Disparities in Breast Cancer and Genomic Uncertainty: A QuantCrit Mini-Review
Gerido, L. H. (2020) · Open Information Science · doi:10.1515/opis-2020-0004 · Cited by 8
Algorithmic Risk Scoring and Welfare State Contact Among US Children
Eiermann, M. (2024) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v11.a26 · Cited by 10
Outsourcing Crimmigration Control
Singler, S. (2025) · doi:10.1093/9780198927525.001.0001 · Cited by 7
Rengifo, A. F., Flores, S., & Jackson, A. N. (2020) · Criminal Justice and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0093854820960504 · Cited by 7
Lecoq, G., Ballucci, D., & Spencer, D. C. (2020) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azaa081 · Cited by 7
El uso de RISCANVI en la toma de decisiones penitenciarias
Aróstegui, L. A. (2023) · Estudios Penales y Criminológicos · doi:10.15304/epc.44.8884 · Cited by 6
Reconceptualising ‘risk’: Towards a humanistic paradigm of sexual offending
McAlinden, A. (2021) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639211032957 · Cited by 6
Analysing the multiple dimensions of predictive policing’s techno-social harms
Wood, M. A., & Warren, I. (2022) · Justice, power and resistance · doi:10.1332/nyhn8325 · Cited by 7
Discretion in the Surveillance State
Hardy, M. (2019) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-19566-3_4 · Cited by 6
Algorithms, policing, and race
Ugwudike, P. (2023) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9781003176619-16 · Cited by 5
Producing criminality: The expanding power of crime analysts
Ballucci, D. (2023) · Crime Law and Social Change · doi:10.1007/s10611-023-10094-x · Cited by 5
Engendering assemblages: the constitution of digital health data as an epistemic consumption object
Fisher, E., & Rosenhek, Z. (2022) · Journal of Cultural Economy · doi:10.1080/17530350.2022.2073557 · Cited by 5
The Black Box Problem in Administering Justice: Risks of Opaque Algorithms in Legal Decision-Making
Murodova, S. (2025) · International journal of law and policy · doi:10.59022/ijlp.331 · Cited by 6
Techno-digital policing and speculative fictions: Towards a criminology of the future
Campbell, E. (2024) · Crime Media Culture An International Journal · doi:10.1177/17416590241253543 · Cited by 4
Wenzelburger, G., Yeung, K., & Hartmann, K. (2025) · Digital Society · doi:10.1007/s44206-025-00194-7 · Cited by 7
Rethinking prevention as a reactive force to contain dangerous classes
Aedo, Á., & Faba, P. (2022) · Anthropological Theory · doi:10.1177/14634996211069757 · Cited by 4
Data-Driven Algorithms in Criminal Justice: Predictions as Self-fulfilling Prophecies
Ugwudike, P. (2021) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108891325.015 · Cited by 4
Luscombe, A., Duncan, J., & Walby, K. (2022) · Journal of Criminal Justice Education · doi:10.1080/10511253.2022.2027477 · Cited by 3
The Institute of Release from Punishment in the Aspect of Forecasting and Risk Management
Andrianov, V., Pudovochkin, Y., & Tolkachenko, A. A. (2022) · Russian Journal of Criminology · doi:10.17150/2500-4255.2022.16(3).329-341 · Cited by 3
Singler, S. (2025) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/13624806251336758 · Cited by 3
Wenzelburger, G., & König, P. D. (2022) · Law & Policy · doi:10.1111/lapo.12197 · Cited by 3
Robodeport or surveillance fantasy?: how automated is automatic visa cancellation in Australia?
Weber, L., & Gerard, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Sociology · doi:10.3389/fsoc.2024.1336160 · Cited by 3
الطبيعة القانونية للتنبؤ بالجريمة بواسطة الذكاء الاصطناعي ومشروعيته
Elsherif, M. S. (2021) · Arab Journal of Forensic Sciences and Forensic Medicine · doi:10.26735/ngso4969 · Cited by 5
Legal Relations: Оccurrence and Regulation
Ershov, V. V. (2022) · Pravosudie / Justice · doi:10.37399/2686-9241.2022.1.8-27 · Cited by 3
Documenting the Document: The Forensic Hospital Report and Its Knowledge Moves
King, T. J., Shaw, J. D. M., & Kennedy, L. (2023) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639231187093 · Cited by 3
“Büyük Verinin Gücü Adına”: Siyasi Kampanyalarda Etkili Veri Kullanımı
Seyidov, İ. (2021) · TRT Akademi · doi:10.37679/trta.802534 · Cited by 3
Pains of privacy: Mapping carceral practices onto electronic monitoring
Kirk, G. (2024) · Theoretical Criminology · doi:10.1177/13624806241257187 · Cited by 2
Rosbrook‐Thompson, J., Greer, C., McLaughlin, E., Ilan, J., Armstrong, G., Myers, C., Taylor, E., & Rojek, C. (2024) · The British Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1093/bjc/azae089 · Cited by 2
Lv, T., Jiang, J., & Meng, Y. (2026) · Asian Journal of Criminology · doi:10.1007/s11417-026-09493-5 · Cited by 2
Digital Technologies in Russian Criminal Proceedings: Limits and Problems of Implementation
Borodinova, T. G. (2022) · Pravosudie / Justice · doi:10.37399/2686-9241.2022.1.71-86 · Cited by 2
The persistent attractions of low-tech: Challenging the efficiency paradigm of forensic technology
Vestad, M. (2024) · International Journal of Police Science & Management · doi:10.1177/14613557241231164 · Cited by 2
Thoughts about intersectionality and risk. Interviews with key scholars
Nygren, K. G., Olofsson, A., Bowleg, L., Curran, D., Hannah‐Moffat, K., Mitchell, C. M., Peek, L., Ignacio Rubio, C., & Zinn, J. O. (2024) · Journal of Risk Research · doi:10.1080/13669877.2024.2340027 · Cited by 2
Self-citation25 years of technology use in policing
Ugwudike, P. (2024) · International Journal of Police Science & Management · doi:10.1177/14613557241298863 · Cited by 2
COVID-19 Risks: Dynamics of Culture and Inequality Across Six Continents
Zinn, J. O., & Brown, P. R. (2022) · Critical studies in risk and uncertainty · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-95167-2_1 · Cited by 2
Brayne, S. (2020) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780190684099.003.0003 · Cited by 2
Accelerated Pre-Trial Proceedings in the Russian Criminal Process: Formation of Optimal Models
KACHALOVA, O. V., & Gerasenkov, V. M. (2022) · Pravosudie / Justice · doi:10.37399/2686-9241.2022.1.103-121 · Cited by 2
The Extremism Machine: Exploring the Effects of Digital Capitalism on the Far-Right Field
Lindsay, A. (2024) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.25476043 · Cited by 2
Barmaki, R. (2025) · International Criminology · doi:10.1007/s43576-025-00170-8 · Cited by 1
Easton, S. M., & Piper, C. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oso/9780192863294.003.0003 · Cited by 1
Every Object Needs a Place: Evidence Management, Access to Justice, and the Rule of law
Vestad, M. (2025) · Social & Legal Studies · doi:10.1177/09646639251363397 · Cited by 2
Social Control Through Data Science Systems: A Conceptual Essay
Boers, K., Grimme, C., Huang, H., Kemme, S., Schaerff, M., & Singelnstein, T. (2025) · International Criminology · doi:10.1007/s43576-025-00204-1 · Cited by 1
AL-Khrisha, A. S. (2026) · Frontiers in Human Dynamics · doi:10.3389/fhumd.2026.1838858 · Cited by 1
Dias, S. A. D. J., Sátiro, R. M., & Limongi, R. (2026) · Social Sciences & Humanities Open · doi:10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.103145 · Cited by 2
Termination of Criminal Proceedings on Dispositive Grounds: Compromise or Forgiveness?
Stelmakh, V. Y. (2022) · Pravosudie / Justice · doi:10.37399/2686-9241.2022.1.122-143 · Cited by 1
Metadata
- Authors
- Hannah-Moffat, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Venue
- Theoretical Criminology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-03-22
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 453-470
- ISSN
- 1362-4806 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7439
- OpenAlex
- W2790702402
- Cited by
- 236
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 27 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 70 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 36 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 5
- FWCI
- 35.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Theoretical Criminology (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Ethics and Social Impacts of AI
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
- Social Sciences › Law › Artificial Intelligence in Law
- Keywords
- big data analytics, information activism, race, risk narratives, social justice organizations, criminal justice organizations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
