Cited by 62Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMental Health and PsychiatryCultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections

The Validity of DSM-IV Dissociative Disorders Categories in South-West Uganda

Van Duijl, Marjolein, Cardeña, Etzel, De Jong, Joop T. V. M.·2005·Transcultural Psychiatry

Abstract

There is little systematic research on the cross-cultural validity of the dissociative disorders, especially in non-western countries. This study evaluates the fit of the DSM-IV classification and concepts of these disorders with local concepts, experiences and local presentations in south-west Uganda. We conducted focus group discussions with medical students, traditional healers, religious leaders, counselors, community members and other health workers ( n = 48). They were supplemented by key informant interviews with religious people, traditional healers and leaders ( n = 11). The responses were subjected to thematic analysis. Dissociative amnesia and depersonalization were generally recognized and seen as the result of traumatic experiences and were useful categories in Uganda. However, dissociative fugue did not match local concepts and was confused with spirit possession and other conditions such as alcoholic fugues and dementia. The description of dissociative identity disorder was always interpreted as a possession trance disorder by the local healers. We found only partial support for the validity of the DSM-IV classification of dissociative disorders in Uganda.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1363461505052666

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Van Duijl, M., Cardeña, E., & De Jong, J. T. V. M.
Affiliations
  • Center for Mental Health, Winschoten,
  • The University of Texas System (US)
  • Vrije Universiteit and Transcultural Psychosocial Organization, Amsterdam,
Venue
Transcultural Psychiatry
Published
2005-06
Volume
42
Issue
2
Pages
219-241
ISSN
  • 1363-4615 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7471
OpenAlex
W2104552846
Cited by
62
References
33
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Transcultural Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Cultural Studies › Cultural, Psychoanalytic, and Sociopolitical Reflections
Keywords
dissociative disorders, DSM-IV classification, cross-cultural validity, Uganda, traditional healers, spirit possession, dissociative amnesia, depersonalization, dissociative fugue, dissociative identity disorder, traumatic events
MeSH terms
Adult, Clergy, Cross-Cultural Comparison, Diagnosis, Differential, Dissociative Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Medicine, Traditional, Middle Aged, Psychometrics, Religion and Psychology, Spiritualism, Statistics as Topic, Students, Medical, Students, Nursing, Uganda, Reproducibility of Results, Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review