The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Social Structure Shapes Cultural Stereotypes and Emotions: A Causal Test of the Stereotype Content Model
Open accessAbstract
The stereotype content model (SCM) posits that social structure predicts specific cultural stereotypes and associated emotional prejudices. No prior evidence at a societal level has manipulated both structural predictors and measured both stereotypes and prejudices. In the present study, participants ( n = 120) responded to an immigration scenario depicting a high- or low-status group, competitive or not competitive, and rated their likely stereotype (on warmth and competence) and elicited emotional prejudices (admiration, contempt, envy, and pity). Seven of eight specific predictions are fully confirmed, supporting the SCM's predicted causality for social structural effects on cultural stereotypes and emotional prejudices.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications
Cortina, J. M. (1993) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 · Cited by 8,810 · cited 1×
“The alpha coeffi cients for admiration and contempt are relatively low, according to Rosenthal and Rosnow (1991), but not exceptionally so, given that both variables are composed of only two items (Cortina, 1993).”
BackgroundUniversal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 · Cited by 4,567
Self-citation
Cited by
The Benefits of Climate for Inclusion for Gender-Diverse Groups
Nishii, L. H. (2013) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2009.0823 · Cited by 1,354
Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure
Fiske, S. T. (2018) · Current Directions in Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0963721417738825 · Cited by 839
Self-citationEsses, V. M., Hamilton, L. K., & Gaucher, D. (2017) · Social Issues and Policy Review · doi:10.1111/sipr.12028 · Cited by 436
Kubota, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Phelps, E. A. (2012) · Nature Neuroscience · doi:10.1038/nn.3136 · Cited by 242
Intergroup biases: a focus on stereotype content
Fiske, S. T. (2015) · Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.cobeha.2015.01.010 · Cited by 215
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Caprariello, P. A., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Fiske, S. T.
- Venue
- Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-03
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 147-155
- ISSN
- 1368-4302 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7188
- OpenAlex
- W2114525175
- Cited by
- 257
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 40.16
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Social Structure Shapes Cultural Stereotypes and Emotions: A Causal Test of the Stereotype Content Model. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1368430208101053
- The paper
- Caprariello, P. A., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Fiske, S. T. (2009). Social Structure Shapes Cultural Stereotypes and Emotions: A Causal Test of the Stereotype Content Model. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430208101053
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
