Cited by 839Social and Intergroup PsychologySocial Power and Status DynamicsCultural Differences and Values

Stereotype Content: Warmth and Competence Endure

Open access
Fiske, Susan T.·2018·Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract

Two dimensions persist in social cognition when people are making sense of individuals or groups. The stereotype content model (SCM) terms these two basic dimensions perceived warmth (trustworthiness, friendliness) and competence (capability, assertiveness). Measured reliably and validly, these Big Two dimensions converge across survey, cultural, laboratory, and biobehavioral approaches. Generality across place, levels, and time further support the framework. Similar dimensions have emerged repeatedly over the history of psychology and in current theories. The SCM proposes and tests a comprehensive causal theory: Perceived social structure (cooperation, status) predicts stereotypes (warmth, competence), which in turn predict emotional prejudices (pride, pity, contempt, envy), and finally, the emotions predict discrimination (active and passive help and harm). The SCM uncovers systematic content and dynamics of stereotypes, which has practical implications.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0963721417738825

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Durante F Tablante CB Fiske ST 2017 Poor but warm, rich but cold (and competent): Social classes in the stereotype content model Journal of Social Issues 73 1 131 150
  2. Russell AM Fiske ST 2008 It’s all relative: Social position and interpersonal perception European Journal of Social Psychology 38 1193 1201

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Fiske, S. T.
Affiliations
Princeton University (US)
Corresponding author
Fiske, Susan T.
Venue
Current Directions in Psychological Science
Published
2018-02-28
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
67-73
ISSN
  • 0963-7214 (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-8721
OpenAlex
W2791423782
Cited by
839
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 168 · 2025: 166 · 2024: 125 · 2023: 105 · 2022: 96 · 2021: 84 · 2020: 57 · 2019: 32 · 2018: 6
FWCI
101.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Current Directions in Psychological Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (P2CHD047879)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Cultural Differences and Values
Keywords
stereotype content model, perceived warmth, perceived competence, stereotypes, social cognition, discrimination, cross-cultural consistency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review