Cited by 242Social and Intergroup PsychologyFace Recognition and PerceptionRacial and Ethnic Identity Research

The neuroscience of race

Open access
Kubota, Jennifer T, Banaji, Mahzarin R, Phelps, Elizabeth A·2012·Nature Neuroscience

Abstract

As the racial composition of the population changes, intergroup interactions are increasingly common. To understand how we perceive and categorize race and the attitudes that flow from it, scientists have used brain imaging techniques to examine how social categories of race and ethnicity are processed, evaluated and incorporated in decision-making. We review these findings, focusing on black and white race categories. A network of interacting brain regions is important in the unintentional, implicit expression of racial attitudes and its control. On the basis of the overlap in the neural circuitry of race, emotion and decision-making, we speculate as to how this emerging research might inform how we recognize and respond to variations in race and its influence on unintended race-based attitudes and decisions.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/nn.3136

Cites

101 of 101 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Implicit racial biases can be measured behaviourally using an implicit association task and can be seen at the neural level in distinct patterns of brain activity.

    “These implicit racial biases can be measured behaviourally using an implicit association task (IAT: See Glossary [15]), but also can be seen at the neural level in the form of distinct patterns of brain activity [2].”
  • The networks involved in implicit racial bias serve two related yet distinct functions: the amygdala generates a rapid, automatic affective reaction to other-race stimuli, and the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex control and regulate the expression of this affective reaction according to explicitly desired behaviours.

    “The networks involved in implicit racial bias are already known [2], and appear to serve two related yet distinct functions.The first function, likely to be subserved by the amygdala, generates a rapid, automatic affective reaction to other-race stimuli, and the second, subserved by the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex and anterior cingulate cortex, controls and regulates the expression of this”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. [71]Dasgupta N Nelson T Mechanisms underlying the malleability of implicit prejudice and stereotypes: the role of automaticity and cognitive control Handbook of Stereotyping, Prejudice, and Discrimination 267 284 Psychol. Press 2009
  2. [75]Glimcher PW Fehr E Rangel A Camerer C Poldrack RA Neuroeconomics Academic Press 2009

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Kubota, J. T., Banaji, M. R., & Phelps, E. A.
Affiliations
  • New York University (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Phelps, Elizabeth A
Venue
Nature Neuroscience
Published
2012-06-26
Volume
15
Issue
7
Pages
940-948
ISSN
  • 1097-6256 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1726
OpenAlex
W2083279078
Cited by
242
References
101
Citations by year
2026: 13 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 18 · 2017: 28 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 3
FWCI
8.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
  • Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
  • U.S. Public Health Service (MIT080756)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH080756)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Racial and Ethnic Identity Research
Keywords
race, ethnicity, implicit racial attitudes, racial classification, intergroup interaction, emotional decision-making
MeSH terms
Attitude, Black or African American, Brain Mapping, Humans, Neurosciences, United States, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review