The DOI matches its Crossref record; 98 of the 98 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The ideological basis of antiscientific attitudes: Effects of authoritarianism, conservatism, religiosity, social dominance, and system justification
Open accessAbstract
Serious concerns about public distrust of scientific experts and the spread of misinformation are growing in the US and elsewhere. To gauge ideological and psychological variability in attitudes toward science, we conducted an extensive analysis of public opinion data based on a nationally representative survey of U.S. adults ( N = 1,500) and a large replication sample ( N = 2,119). We estimated the unique effects of partisanship, symbolic and operational forms of political ideology, right-wing authoritarianism (RWA), social dominance orientation (SDO), and general system justification (GSJ), after adjusting for demographic factors. Multiverse analyses revealed that (a) conservatism and SDO were significant predictors of distrust of climate science in > 99.9% of model specifications, with conservatism accounting for 80% of the total variance; (b) conservatism, RWA, religiosity, (male) sex, (low) education, (low) income, and distrust of climate science were significant predictors of skepticism about science in general (vs. faith) in > 99.9% of model specifications; (c) conservatism, RWA, (low) education, and distrust of climate science were significant predictors of trust in ordinary people (over scientific experts) > 99.9% of the time; and (d) GSJ was a significant predictor of trust in scientific experts (over ordinary people) 81% of the time, after adjusting for all other demographic and ideological factors. Implications for the role of science in democratic society are dis…
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Motivated skepticism about anthropogenic climate change is also tied to economic system justification — that is, defence of the capitalist system184,185”
From Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts (2022) · cites this paper as [185]
Citations
Cites
The Elements of Statistical Learning
Hastie, T., Tibshirani, R., & Friedman, J. (2009) · Springer Series in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-0-387-84858-7 · Cited by 25,970
Advances In Experimental Social Psychology
(2022) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(22)x0002-6 · Cited by 22,559
Regularization and Variable Selection Via the Elastic Net
Zou, H., & Hastie, T. (2005) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-9868.2005.00503.x · Cited by 20,957
An Introduction to Statistical Learning
James, G., Witten, D., Hastie, T., & Tibshirani, R. (2013) · Springer Texts in Statistics · doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-7138-7 · Cited by 12,106
A Caution Regarding Rules of Thumb for Variance Inflation Factors
O’brien, R. M. (2007) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6 · Cited by 11,217
Lazer, D. M. J., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., Rothschild, D., et al. (2018) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aao2998 · Cited by 4,160
Identifying careless responses in survey data.
Meade, A. W., & Craig, S. B. (2012) · Psychological Methods · doi:10.1037/a0028085 · Cited by 3,865
(2011) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.48-6243 · Cited by 3,575
Relative Importance for Linear Regression in R : The Package relaimpo
Grömping, U. (2006) · Journal of Statistical Software · doi:10.18637/jss.v017.i01 · Cited by 2,615
Achen, C. H., & Bartels, L. M. (2016) · Princeton University Press eBooks · doi:10.1515/9781400882731 · Cited by 1,736
Research works printed but not linked: 5
- Benkler Y. Faris R. Roberts H. Zuckerman E. (2017). Study: Breitbart-led right-wing media ecosystem altered broader media agenda. Columbia Journalism Review. http://www.cjr.org/analysis/breitbart-media-trump-harvard-study.php
- Dewey J. (1939). Freedom and culture. Putnam.
- Goren P. (2013). On voter competence. Oxford University Press.
- 10.1016/bs.adms.2014.08.005 · DOI
- 10.1017/S1930297500003788 · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Cognitive–motivational mechanisms of political polarization in social-communicative contexts
Jost, J. T., Baldassarri, D. S., & Druckman, J. N. (2022) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-022-00093-5 · Cited by 276
Self-citationTrust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countries
Cologna, V., Mede, N. G., Berger, S., Besley, J. C., Brick, C., Joubert, M., Maibach, E. W., Mihelj, S., Орескес, Н., Schäfer, M. S., et al. (2025) · Nature Human Behaviour · doi:10.1038/s41562-024-02090-5 · Cited by 451
Self-citationThe psychological causes and societal consequences of authoritarianism
Osborne, D., Costello, T. H., Duckitt, J. H., & Sibley, C. G. (2023) · Nature Reviews Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44159-023-00161-4 · Cited by 184
The Replication Crisis Has Led to Positive Structural, Procedural, and Community Changes
Korbmacher, M., Azevedo, F., Pennington, C. R., Hartmann, H., Pownall, M., Schmidt, K., Elsherif, M., Breznau, N., Robertson, O., Kalandadze, T., et al. (2023) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-023-00003-2 · Cited by 137
Self-citationBiddlestone, M., Azevedo, F., & van der Linden, S. (2022) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101390 · Cited by 119
Self-citationDeepfakes and scientific knowledge dissemination
Doss, C., Mondschein, J., Shu, D., Wolfson, T., Kopecky, D., Fitton-Kane, V. A., Bush, L., & Tucker, C. (2023) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-39944-3 · Cited by 90
Trust in scientists and their role in society across 68 countriesPreprint
Cologna, V., Mede, N. G., Berger, S., Besley, J. C., Brick, C. A., Joubert, M., Maibach, E. W., Mihelj, S., Орескес, Н., Schäfer, M. S., et al. (2024) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/6ay7s · Cited by 84
Scientific-Consensus Communication About Contested Science: A Preregistered Meta-Analysis
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., Riet, J. V. ‘., & Buijzen, M. (2022) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/09567976221083219 · Cited by 69
Social and moral psychology of COVID-19 across 69 countries
Azevedo, F., Pavlovic, T. M., do Rêgo, G. G., Ay, F. C., Gjoneska, B., Etienne, T. W., Ross, R. M., Schönegger, P., Riaño-Moreno, J. C., Cichocka, A. K., et al. (2023) · Scientific Data · doi:10.1038/s41597-023-02080-8 · Cited by 84
Self-citationVranić, A., Hromatko, I., & Tonković, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.931865 · Cited by 67
Trust in climate science and climate scientists: A narrative review
Cologna, V., Kotcher, J., Mede, N. G., Besley, J. C., Maibach, E. W., & Орескес, Н. (2024) · PLOS Climate · doi:10.1371/journal.pclm.0000400 · Cited by 58
Rothmund, T., Farkhari, F., Ziemer, C., & Azevedo, F. (2022) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625211068131 · Cited by 52
Self-citationRumors in Retweet: Ideological Asymmetry in the Failure to Correct Misinformation
DeVerna, M., Guess, A. M., Berinsky, A. J., Tucker, J. A., & Jost, J. T. (2022) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672221114222 · Cited by 51
Self-citationMcLamore, Q., Syropoulos, S., Leidner, B., Hirschberger, G., Young, K., Zein, R. A., Baumert, A., Bilewicz, M., Bilgen, A., van Bezouw, M. J., et al. (2022) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-022-07508-6 · Cited by 48
Trends in American scientists’ political donations and implications for trust in science
Kaurov, A. A., Cologna, V., Tyson, C., & Орескес, Н. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01382-3 · Cited by 37
Explaining Polarized Trust in Scientists: A Political Stereotype-Approach
Altenmüller, M. S., Wingen, T., & Schulte, A. (2024) · Science Communication · doi:10.1177/10755470231221770 · Cited by 40
COVID-19 Skepticism in Relation to Other Forms of Science Skepticism
Scheitle, C. P., & Corcoran, K. E. (2021) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231211049841 · Cited by 38
Cipriani, E., Frumento, S., Gemignani, A., & Menicucci, D. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102277 · Cited by 44
Chemical space: limits, evolution and modelling of an object bigger than our universal library
Restrepo, G. (2022) · Digital Discovery · doi:10.1039/d2dd00030j · Cited by 35
Azevedo, F., Marques, T., & Micheli, L. R. (2022) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592722001098 · Cited by 37
Self-citationSocial and moral psychology of COVID-19 across 69 countriesPreprint
Azevedo, F., Pavlović, T., do Rêgo, G. G., Ay, F. C., Gjoneska, B., Etienne, T. W., Ross, R. M., Schönegger, P., Riaño, J., Cichocka, A. K., et al. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/a3562 · Cited by 25
Self-citationCampbell, J. W., & Ahn, Y. (2023) · Asia Pacific Journal of Public Administration · doi:10.1080/23276665.2023.2228435 · Cited by 21
Both‐Sideology Endangers Democracy and Social Science
Jost, J. T. (2024) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.12633 · Cited by 23
Self-citationRace, ethnicity, and support for climate policy
Benegal, S., Azevedo, F., & Holman, M. R. (2022) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/aca0ac · Cited by 20
Self-citationThe replication crisis has led to positive structural, procedural, and community changesPreprint
Korbmacher, M., Azevedo, F., Pennington, C. R., Hartmann, H., Pownall, M., Schmidt, K., Elsherif, M. M., Breznau, N., Robertson, O. M., Kalandadze, T., et al. (2023) · MetArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31222/osf.io/r6cvx · Cited by 18
Self-citationConsistent effects of science and scientist characteristics on public trust across political regimes
Younger-Khan, S., Weidmann, N. B., & Oswald, L. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03909-2 · Cited by 20
Bogg, T., Milad, E., & Godfrey, O. (2022) · Health Psychology · doi:10.1037/hea0001200 · Cited by 15
A group processes approach to antiscience beliefs and endorsement of “alternative facts”
Rutjens, B. T., van der Linden, S., van der Lee, R., & Zarzeczna, N. (2021) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302211009708 · Cited by 14
Vitriol, J. A., Sandor, J., Vidigal, R., & Farhart, C. E. (2022) · Applied Cognitive Psychology · doi:10.1002/acp.4022 · Cited by 13
Zeineddine, F. B., Saab, R., Lášticová, B., Ayanian, A. H., & Kende, A. (2022) · Journal of Social and Political Psychology · doi:10.5964/jspp.8311 · Cited by 11
Are Stealth Democrats Really Committed to Democracy? Process Preferences Revisited
Bloeser, A. J., Williams, T., Crawford, C., & Harward, B. M. (2022) · Perspectives on Politics · doi:10.1017/s1537592722003206 · Cited by 13
Dakin, N. M., Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T. (2023) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12913 · Cited by 11
Self-citationBoggio, P. S., Nezlek, J. B., Alfano, M., Azevedo, F., Capraro, V., Cichocka, A. K., Pärnamets, P., do Rêgo, G. G., Sampaio, W. M., Sjåstad, H., et al. (2023) · Group Processes & Intergroup Relations · doi:10.1177/13684302231153800 · Cited by 10
Self-citationThe role of narcissism and motivated reasoning on misinformation propagation
Haupt, M. R., Cuomo, R. E., Mackey, T. K., & Seana Coulson, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Communication · doi:10.3389/fcomm.2024.1472631 · Cited by 10
de Zavala, A. G. (2025) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/josi.70000 · Cited by 12
Šimić, A., Sacchi, S., Pagliaro, S., Pacilli, M. G., & Brambilla, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2022.795654 · Cited by 9
Howard, M. C. (2023) · Vaccine · doi:10.1016/j.vaccine.2023.06.057 · Cited by 9
Hirsch, M. (2022) · Frontiers in Political Science · doi:10.3389/fpos.2022.929991 · Cited by 9
Azevedo, F., Micheli, L. R., & Bolesta, D. S. (2023) · Journal of Experimental Political Science · doi:10.1017/xps.2022.35 · Cited by 6
Self-citationScientific consensus communication about contested science: A preregistered meta-analysisPreprint
van Stekelenburg, A., Schaap, G., Veling, H., Riet, J. V. ‘., & Buijzen, M. (2022) · OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/etsrw · Cited by 8
Trust in climate science and climate scientists: A narrative reviewPreprint
Cologna, V., Kotcher, J., Mede, N. G., Besley, J. C., Maibach, E. W., & Орескес, Н. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/hj2xk · Cited by 7
How scientists’ collective climate advocacy affects public trust in scientists and voting behavior
Cologna, V., Freundt, J., Mede, N. G., Howe, L. C., Bertsou, E., Gloor, J. L. P., Орескес, Н., Knutti, R., & Schäfer, M. S. (2024) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/ad984c · Cited by 6
Mapping patterns of trust in science and scientists
Younger-Khan, S. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102203 · Cited by 6
Saunders, B. A., & Jost, J. T. (2023) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780197655467.003.0010 · Cited by 6
Self-citationRemsö, A., & Renström, E. A. (2023) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2023.1303157 · Cited by 5
The role of worldviews, radicalization risk factors, and personality in harassment of scientists
Gligorić, V., Reinhardt, C., Nieuwenhuijzen, E., de Castro, J. O., Feddes, A. R., Kleef, G. A. V., & Rutjens, B. T. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-85208-7 · Cited by 5
Godfrey, O., Bogg, T., & Milad, E. (2023) · Annals of Behavioral Medicine · doi:10.1093/abm/kaad043 · Cited by 5
Psychology of Authoritarianism
Gøtzsche‐Astrup, O., & Hogg, M. A. (2024) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198871996.013.46 · Cited by 5
Longtime nemeses or cordial allies? How individuals mentally relate science and religion.
Zein, R. A., Altenmüller, M. S., & Gollwitzer, M. (2024) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000492 · Cited by 6
Men's Hostile Sexism Predicts Skepticism of Sexual Assault Science
Betz, D. E., Deegan, K., & Gomes, A. (2023) · Psychology of Women Quarterly · doi:10.1177/03616843231215373 · Cited by 4
Olivett, V. J., Maranges, H. M., & March, D. S. (2023) · Journal of Applied Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/jasp.12960 · Cited by 5
Intellectual humility predicts trust in science and scientists and climate change skepticism
Huynh, H. P., Stanley, S. K., Leviston, Z., & Lilley, M. K. (2025) · Personality and Individual Differences · doi:10.1016/j.paid.2025.113366 · Cited by 4
Ding, Y., Johar, G. V., & Morris, M. W. (2024) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae144 · Cited by 4
Partisanship and Mental Health: Help Seeking and Institutional Trust in a Polarized Country
Lyons, J., Schafer, E. J., Touchton, M. M., & Doherty, D. (2025) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.70035 · Cited by 3
Justwan, F., & Baumgaertner, B. O. (2025) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0338088 · Cited by 3
The Appropriation of Religiousity in the 2024 Indonesian Presidential
Lindgren, T., Prasojo, Z. H., Bugov, D. T., Riduan, I. M., & Anam, K. (2024) · IAS Journal of Localities · doi:10.62033/iasjol.v2i2.78 · Cited by 3
Grigoropoulos, I. N. (2024) · American Journal of Sexuality Education · doi:10.1080/15546128.2024.2410315 · Cited by 7
Global Perspectives on Science, Polarization, and Populism Special Issue Introduction
Dal, A., & Nisbet, E. C. (2024) · International Journal of Public Opinion Research · doi:10.1093/ijpor/edaf009 · Cited by 3
Explaining polarized trust in scientists: A political stereotype-approachPreprint
Altenmüller, M. S., Wingen, T., & Schulte, A. (2022) · doi:10.31219/osf.io/tdukb · Cited by 3
College Education, Politics, and Attitudes Towards Capital Punishment
Anderson, A. L., & Schwadel, P. (2024) · American Journal of Criminal Justice · doi:10.1007/s12103-024-09782-8 · Cited by 2
Measuring How Individuals Relate Science to Religion
Zein, R. A., Heene, M., & Gollwitzer, M. (2025) · International Journal for the Psychology of Religion · doi:10.1080/10508619.2025.2535033 · Cited by 1
Misinformation as strategy: Epistemic consequences and the undermining of shared truth.
Ecker, U. K. H., Spearing, E. R., DiResta, R., & Lewandowsky, S. (2026) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2026.06.009 · Cited by 3
Woitzel, J., & Koch, A. S. (2025) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672251345519 · Cited by 2
Garrido, L. E., Christensen, A. P., Golino, H. F., Martínez‐Molina, A., Arias, V. B., Guerra-Peña, K., Nieto, M. D., Azevedo, F., & Abad, F. J. (2025) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1080/00273171.2025.2545362 · Cited by 4
Self-citationBridging the Divide: An Interdisciplinary Analysis of Trust in Science
Kabakçı, G. Z., Kara, U. Y., Çavdar, G. B., & Toros, E. (2025) · SAGE Open · doi:10.1177/21582440251352376 · Cited by 1
Malinen, S. K., Nikkanen, M., & Kekki, T. (2025) · Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly · doi:10.1177/08997640251363153 · Cited by 1
Gwynne, K. G., O’Farrell, T., Young, A., Morawakage, T., Gamble, L., & Perrett, K. P. (2025) · Australian Health Review · doi:10.1071/ah25240 · Cited by 1
Moral values & trust in science
Joyner, L. C. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102212 · Cited by 1
Global studies on trust in science suggest new theoretical and methodological directions
Pfänder, J., Mede, N. G., & Cologna, V. (2025) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2025.102215 · Cited by 1
Evans, N. D., & Fetterman, A. K. (2025) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625251372820 · Cited by 1
Climate Views and Changing Public Perceptions of the Practice of Science
Safford, T. G., Whitmore, E. H., & Goodwin, S. H. (2025) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.70115 · Cited by 1
Intersecting identities: sociodemographic heterogeneity in right-wing climate attitudes in the UK
Miao, Y. (2026) · Environmental Sociology · doi:10.1080/23251042.2026.2648028 · Cited by 1
Compensating Service Failures: The Moderating Role of Customers’ Political Ideology
Oh, H., & Chan, E. Y. (2024) · Australasian Marketing Journal (AMJ) · doi:10.1177/14413582241252915 · Cited by 1
Education for deliberative democracy through the long-term view
Huttunen, H. (2024) · Theory and Research in Education · doi:10.1177/14778785241264497 · Cited by 6
Siemiątkowski, M., Bilewicz, M., & Babińska, M. (2025) · Political Psychology · doi:10.1111/pops.70054 · Cited by 1
Jost, J. T., Gries, T., & Müller, V. (2022) · Psychological Inquiry · doi:10.1080/1047840x.2022.2065135 · Cited by 1
Self-citationMcLamore, Q., Syropoulos, S., Leidner, B., Hirschberger, G., Young, K., Zein, R. A., Baumert, A., Bilewicz, M., Bilgen, A., van Bezouw, M. J., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-804300/v2 · Cited by 1
Garrido, L. E., Golino, H. F., Christensen, A. P., Martínez‐Molina, A., Arias, V. B., Guerra-Peña, K., Dolores, M., Azevedo, F., & Abad, F. J. (2022) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/5n3sy · Cited by 1
Self-citationMcLamore, Q., Syropoulos, S., Leidner, B., Hirschberger, G., Young, K., Zein, R. A., Baumert, A., Bilewicz, M., van Bezouw, M. J., Chatard, A., et al. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-804300/v1
Brown, A. M. (2022) · Culture, theory and critique/Culture, theory & critique · doi:10.1080/14735784.2022.2098151
Kabengele, M.-C., Keller, L., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/nstv7 · Cited by 1
Monological or Ideological? Themes and Psychosocial Predictors of Conspiracy BeliefPreprint
Cosgrove, T. J., Bahr, M., & Fritzon, K. (2023) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/2kwbx
Religious Commitment and System Justification Among University Students
Mahmood, M. (2022) · Evaluation Study of Three Diagnostic Methods for Helicobacter pylori Infection · doi:10.24271/jgu.2022.174547
Sensales, G., Cicco, G. D., Molinario, E., Prislei, L., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2024) · Palgrave Studies in Political Psychology · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-44073-1_8 · Cited by 2
How do you argue with a meme?Preprint
Little, H., & Sulik, J. (2024) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/8qgh3
Grossmann, M., & Hopkins, D. A. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009057141.010
Marching to the left: Building an Integrated Process Model of ideological threat response
van Rensburg, G. J. (2025) · Open Access Victoria University of Wellington | Te Herenga Waka (Figshare) · doi:10.26686/wgtn.28207820
A Redefinition of Left and Right
Alexander, J. W. (2025) · The European Legacy · doi:10.1080/10848770.2025.2460277
Climate Change and Intergroup Relations: A Systematic Review
Eniç, D. (2025) · Celal Bayar Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi · doi:10.18026/cbayarsos.1565537
Little, H., & Sulik, J. (2025) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625251341509
Kirkpatrick, A. W. (2025) · International Journal of Science Education Part B · doi:10.1080/21548455.2025.2516268
Learned Insignificance of Credibility Signs
Kainz, V., Sulik, J., Utz, S., & Enßlin, T. A. (2025) · Cognitive Science · doi:10.1111/cogs.70102
Nezlek, J. B., & Cypryańska, M. (2025) · Journal of Religion and Health · doi:10.1007/s10943-025-02443-y
Review of Siri Gullestad’s article transgender – a challenge for psychoanalysis?
von Weissenberg, J. (2025) · The Scandinavian Psychoanalytic Review · doi:10.1080/01062301.2025.2575428
Frindte, W. (2025) · ZRex – Zeitschrift für Rechtsextremismusforschung · doi:10.3224/zrex.v5i2.05
Khatib, I., Amengay, A., Abdelrahman, M., & Amin, A. (2025) · Political Studies Review · doi:10.1177/14789299251387901
de Zavala, A. G. (2025) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/bs.aesp.2025.10.001
Metadata
- Authors
- Azevedo, F., & Jost, J. T.
- Affiliations
- Friedrich Schiller University Jena (DE)
- New York University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Azevedo, Flávio
- Venue
- Group Processes & Intergroup Relations
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-05-31
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 518-549
- ISSN
- 1368-4302 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7188
- OpenAlex
- W3170700604
- Cited by
- 113
- References
- 97
- Citations by year
- 2026: 13 · 2025: 30 · 2024: 20 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 5
- FWCI
- 24.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Group Processes & Intergroup Relations (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Common Library Network (Der Gemeinsame Bibliotheksverbund) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Science and Science Education
- Keywords
- political ideology, right-wing authoritarianism, conservatism, social dominance orientation, system justification, religiosity, misinformation, partisanship, science and democracy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
