The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Mobile Methods and the Empirical
Abstract
In this article we argue that the mobilities turn and its studies of the performativity of everyday (im)mobilities enable new forms of sociological inquiry, explanation and engagement. New kinds of researchable entities arise, opening up a new or rediscovered realm of the empirical, and new avenues for critique. The mobilities paradigm not only remedies the academic neglect of various movements, of people, objects, information and ideas. It also gathers new empirical sensitivities, analytical orientations, methods and motivations to examine important social and material phenomena and fold social science insight into responses. After an outline of the mobilities paradigm, this article provides a wide-ranging review of emergent `mobile methods' of studying (im)mobilities. We discuss some of the new researchable entities they engender and explore important implications for the relationship between the empirical, theory, critique, and engagement.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning
Barad, K. (2006) · doi:10.2307/j.ctv12101zq · Cited by 10,472
How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics
Hayles, N. K. (1999) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226321394.001.0001 · Cited by 5,284
Karasti, H. (2001) · Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW) · doi:10.1023/a:1011239126617 · Cited by 48
Cited by
Evans, D. (2012) · Sociology · doi:10.1177/0038038511416150 · Cited by 569
Start-Up Nation: Studying Transnational Entrepreneurial Practices in Israel’s Start-Up Ecosystem
Fraiberg, S. (2017) · Journal of Business and Technical Communication · doi:10.1177/1050651917695541 · Cited by 114
Affordances for tourism service design
Tomej, K., & Xiang, Z. (2020) · Annals of Tourism Research · doi:10.1016/j.annals.2020.103029 · Cited by 57
Composing Networks: Writing Practices on Mobile Devices
Swarts, J. (2016) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088316666807 · Cited by 13
Metadata
- Authors
- Büscher, M., & Urry, J.
- Venue
- European Journal of Social Theory
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2009-02
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 99-116
- ISSN
- 1368-4310 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7137
- OpenAlex
- W2101588513
- Cited by
- 755
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 94.43
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Mobile Methods and the Empirical. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/1368431008099642
- The paper
- Büscher, M., & Urry, J. (2009). Mobile Methods and the Empirical. European Journal of Social Theory. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431008099642
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.