Cited by 85Optimism, Hope, and Well-beingPersonality Traits and PsychologyHealth and Wellbeing Research

General self-efficacy in the Norwegian population: differences and similarities between sociodemographic groups

Open access
Bonsaksen, Tore, Lerdal, Anners, Heir, Trond, Ekeberg, Øivind, Skogstad, Laila, Grimholt, Tine K., Schou-Bredal, Inger·2019·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

Aims: General self-efficacy (GSE) refers to optimistic self-beliefs of being able to perform and control behaviors, and is linked with various physical and mental health outcomes. Measures of self-efficacy are commonly used in health research with clinical populations, but are less explored in relationship to sociodemographic characteristics in general populations. This study investigated GSE in relation to sociodemographic characteristics in the general population in Norway. Methods: As part of a larger national survey, the GSE scale was administered to a general population sample, and 1787 out of 4961 eligible participants (response rate 36%) completed the scale. Group comparisons were conducted using independent t -tests and one-way analyses of variance. Linear regression analysis was used to examine factors independently associated with GSE. Results: GSE was lower for older compared to younger participants ( p < 0.001). It was higher for men compared to women ( p < 0.001), higher for those with higher levels of education compared to those with lower levels ( p < 0.001) and higher for those in work compared to their counterparts ( p < 0.001). Controlling for all variables, male gender and employment were independently associated with higher GSE. Age moderated the associations between gender and employment on one hand, and GSE on the other. The association between being male and having higher GSE was more pronounced in younger age, as was the association between being employed and having higher GSE. Conclusions: Male gender and being employed were related to higher GSE among persons in the general population in Norway, and these associations were stronger among persons of younger age. The findings are considered fairly representative for the Norwegian population.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1403494818756701

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bonsaksen, T., Lerdal, A., Heir, T., Ekeberg, Ø., Skogstad, L., Grimholt, T. K., & Schou-Bredal, I.
Affiliations
  • OsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University (NO)
  • University of Oslo (NO)
  • Oslo University Hospital (NO)
  • Department of Nursing Science, Institute of Health and Society, Faculty of Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
Corresponding author
Bonsaksen, Tore
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
2018-02-08
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
695-704
ISSN
  • 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-1905
OpenAlex
W2785813274
Cited by
85
References
21
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 25 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
5.68
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • NORA - Norwegian Open Research Archives (submittedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Optimism, Hope, and Well-being
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Personality Traits and Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health and Wellbeing Research
Keywords
general self-efficacy, sociodemographic differences, gender differences, employment status, age differences, educational attainment, general population, Norwegian population
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Age Factors, Aged, Cross-Sectional Studies, Employment, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Norway, Surveys and Questionnaires, Sex Factors, Socioeconomic Factors, Self Efficacy, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review