Cited by 415Psychosomatic Disorders and Their TreatmentsMusculoskeletal pain and rehabilitationHealth, psychology, and well-being

A scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC)

Eriksen, Hege R., Ihlebæk, Camilla, Ursin, Holger·1999·Scandinavian Journal of Public Health

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present a complete scoring system for subjective health complaints (SHC) as they are experienced by the lay population. The scoring system records the complaints, and does not map attributions or medical diagnoses. In all, 1,219 subjects (323 men, 896 women) from various occupations were tested with a scoring system, the SHC inventory, previously referred to as the Ursin Health Inventory (UHI). The SHC consists of 29 questions concerning severity and duration of subjective somatic and psychological complaints. The SHC inventory yields scores on single items and a total number of health complaints categorized into five factors: musculoskeletal pain (α=0.74), pseudoneurology (α=0.73), gastrointestinal problems (α=0.62), allergy (α=0.58) and flu (α=0.67). The SHC inventory is a systematic, easy, and reliable way to score subjective health complaints. The prevalence of these complaints is high, and should be considered before conclusions are reached about new diseases and new attributions of environmental hazards.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14034948990270010401

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Eriksen, H. R., Ihlebæk, C., & Ursin, H.
Affiliations
University of Bergen (NO)
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Public Health
Published
1999-01
Volume
27
Issue
1
Pages
63-72
ISSN
  • 1403-4948 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-1905
OpenAlex
W2066945198
Cited by
415
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 19 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 28 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 21 · 2012: 23
FWCI
2.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Public Health (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Norges Forskningsråd
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Psychosomatic Disorders and Their Treatments
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Musculoskeletal pain and rehabilitation
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Health, psychology, and well-being
Keywords
subjective health complaints, scoring system, musculoskeletal pain, gastrointestinal problems, allergy, influenza, somatic symptoms, psychological complaints, prevalence, environmental health hazards
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Disability Evaluation, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Gastrointestinal Diseases, Humans, Hypersensitivity, Influenza, Human, Male, Musculoskeletal Diseases, Norway, Occupational Diseases, Psychometrics, Psychophysiologic Disorders, Surveys and Questionnaires, Severity of Illness Index, Reproducibility of Results, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Sex Distribution

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review