Cited by 666Media and Digital CommunicationNews Media Framing and Political CommunicationMediatization and Communication for Social Change

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 49 of the 50 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Interactivity: a concept explication

Kiousis, Spiro·2002·New Media & Society

Abstract

The use of interactivity as a variable in empirical investigations has dramatically increased with the emergence of new communication channels such as the world wide web. Though many scholars have employed the concept in analyses, theoretical and operational definitions are exceedingly scattered and incoherent. Accordingly, the purpose of this project is to engender a detailed explication of interactivity that could bring some consensus to how the concept should be theoretically and operationally defined. Following Chaffee’s (1991) framework for concept explication, we generate new theoretical and operational definitions that may be central to future work in this area. In particular, we suggest that interactivity is both a media and psychological factor that varies across communication technologies, communication contexts, and people’s perceptions.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/146144480200400303

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 50 references

Research works printed but not linked: 19

  1. Aldersey-Williams, H., 1996, Technology Review, 99, 34
  2. Chaffee, S. H., 1991, Communication Concepts 1: Explication
  3. Durlak, J.T, 1987, Communication Yearbook 10, 743
  4. Dyson, E., 1993, Computerworld, 27, 33
  5. Finn, T. A., International Communication Association
  6. Heeter, C., 1989, Media Use in the Information Age: Emerging Patterns of Adoption and Computer Use, 217
  7. Hutheesing, N., 1993, Forbes, 244
  8. Jensen, J. F., 1998, Nordicom Review, 19, 185
  9. Keltner, J.W, 1973, Elements of Interpersonal Communication
  10. Kenney, K., 2000, First Monday Journal
  11. McQuail, D., 1994, Mass Communication Theory
  12. Rafaeli, S., International Communication Association annual convention
  13. Rafaeli, S., 1994, ‘Project H Technical Report’
  14. Reeves, B., 1996, The Media Equation
  15. Sims, R., 1995, Instructional Technology Research Online
  16. Sundar, S. S., Sociology and Social Psychology section at the 21st General Assembly and Scientific Conference of the International Association for Media and Communication Research
  17. Turkle, S., 1984, The Second Self
  18. Wiener, N., 1948, Cybernetics
  19. Wu, G., Annual Conference of the American Academy of Advertising in Albuquerque

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kiousis, S.
Affiliations
University of Florida (US)
Corresponding author
Kiousis, Spiro
Venue
New Media & Society
Published
2002-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
355-383
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
OpenAlex
W2002803426
Cited by
666
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 33 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 37 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 41 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 34 · 2016: 29 · 2015: 40 · 2014: 24 · 2013: 35 · 2012: 36
FWCI
12.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Oregon
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › News Media Framing and Political Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Mediatization and Communication for Social Change
Keywords
interactivity, theoretical definition, operational definitions, communication technology, communicative situations, user perception, media influence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review