CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 273Impact of Technology on AdolescentsLiteracy, Media, and EducationCybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

The influences of information literacy, internet addiction and parenting styles on internet risks

Leung, Louis, Lee, Paul S.N.·2012·New Media & Society
DOI 10.1177/1461444811410406
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine how demographics, addiction symptoms, information literacy, parenting styles and internet activities can predict ‘internet risks’. Data were gathered from a probability sample of 718 adolescents and teenagers, aged 9–19 in Hong Kong, using face-to-face interviews. Results show that adolescents who are often targets of harassment tend to be older boys with a high family income. They are targets probably because they spend a lot of time on social networking sites (SNSs) and prefer the online setting. Adolescents who encounter a lot of unwelcome solicitation of personal or private information online tend to be older girls. In information literacy, they are generally very competent with publishing tools but are not structurally literate, especially in understanding how information is socially situated and produced. Implications and recommendations for future research are discussed.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/1461444811410406

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 47 references

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Banta TW, 2004, Assessment Update, 16, 3
  2. Center for Media Education, 2001, Children’s Online Privacy Protection Act: The First Year
  3. Finkelhor D, 2000, Online Victimization: A Report on the Nation’s Young People
  4. Howe N, 2007, Millennials Go to College: Implementation Guide
  5. Keith S, 2005, Reclaiming Children and Youth, 13, 224
  6. Murray J, 2003, MultiMedia Schools, 10, 14
  7. Rockman IF, 2002, Library Trends, 51, 185

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 201–272 of 272

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Leung, L., & Lee, P. S. N.
Affiliations
Chinese University of Hong Kong (HK)
ORCID
Leung, Louis
Venue
New Media & Society
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Published
2011-08-08
Volume
14
Issue
1
Pages
117-136
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
DOI
10.1177/1461444811410406
OpenAlex
W2147875374
Cited by
273
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 12 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 17 · 2019: 30 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 21 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 19 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 6
FWCI
46.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
journals.sagepub.com/page/policies/text-and-data-mining-license (tdm)
Locations
  • New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
  • Hong Kong Education Bibliographic Database (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Education › Literacy, Media, and Education
  • Social Sciences › Law › Cybercrime and Law Enforcement Studies
Keywords
information literacy, internet addiction, parenting styles, online risks, adolescents, online harassment, social networking sites, demographic predictors, Hong Kong adolescents

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review