Cited by 491Media and Digital CommunicationGender, Feminism, and MediaImpact of Technology on Adolescents

Why’s Everyone on TikTok Now? The Algorithmized Self and the Future of Self-Making on Social Media

Open access
Bhandari, Aparajita, Bimo, Sara·2022·Social Media + Society

Abstract

The video-sharing social media platform TikTok has experienced a rapid rise in use since its release in 2016. While its popularity is undeniable, at the first glance, it seems to offer features already available on previously existing and well-established platforms such as Instagram, YouTube, and Facebook. To understand processes of self-making on TikTok, we undertake two methods of data collection: a walkthrough of the app and its surrounding environment, and 14 semistructured participant interviews. A qualitative analysis of this data finds three distinct themes emerge: (1) awareness of the algorithm, (2) content without context, and (3) self-creation across platforms. These results show that TikTok departs from existing platforms in the model of self-making it engenders, which we term “the algorithmized self”—a complication of the pre-existing “networked self” framework.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/20563051221086241

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • TikTok's algorithmic prominence results in the creation of a personalized "algorithmic version" of each user, categorized according to predefined schemas.

    “Consequently, TikTok’s algorithmic prominence results in the creation of a personalized “algorithmic version” of each user, categorized according to predefined schemas [93–95].”
  • TikTok's recommendation algorithm produces an 'algorithmized self' through recursive dynamics whereby individuals modify behavior to satisfy algorithmic preferences.

    “Bhandari and Bimo [19] examine TikTok's recommendation algorithm and its effects on the 'algorithmized self', revealing recursive dynamics whereby individuals modify behavior to satisfy algorithmic preferences.”
  • This analysis foregrounds how AI systems participate in constituting selfhood itself: organizing subjective experience through narrative coherence, interpretive authority, and self-governance practices.

    “Where existing research examines how algorithms shape identity as social positioning and role performance [10,19], this analysis foregrounds how AI systems participate in constituting selfhood itself: organizing subjective experience through narrative coherence, interpretive authority, and self-governance practices.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bhandari, A., & Bimo, S.
Affiliations
  • Cornell University (US)
  • York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Bhandari, Aparajita
Venue
Social Media + Society
Published
2022-01
Volume
8
Issue
1
ISSN
2056-3051 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4221035882
Cited by
491
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 143 · 2025: 155 · 2024: 109 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 13
FWCI
38.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Social Media + Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Gender Studies › Gender, Feminism, and Media
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
Keywords
TikTok, self-creation, social networking sites, algorithm awareness, networked self, online video platforms, self-presentation, platform comparison

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review