Cited by 24Media and Digital CommunicationMedia Studies and CommunicationSocial Media and Politics

Mapping the transnational imaginary of social media genres

Open access
Hallinan, Blake, Kim, Bumsoo, Scharlach, Rebecca, Trillò, Tommaso, Mizoroki, Saki, Shifman, Limor·2023·New Media & Society

Abstract

This article presents a transnational study of the classification and evaluation of social media content. We conducted a large-scale survey ( N = 4770) in five countries (Germany, Italy, Japan, South Korea, and the United States) with open-ended questions about the types of content people like and dislike. Through iterative and inductive coding, we identified 29 topics, or broad areas of interest, and 213 recurrent genres, or narrower categories that share elements of form and content. We compared the results according to country, gender, age, and education level, identifying patterns of cultural difference and commonality. While we found significant differences in the prominence and preferentiality of content, these distictions were less pronounced for disliked topics around which social media users tended to converge. Finally, we discuss genre imaginaries as normative maps that reflect ideas about morality in general and the purpose of social media in particular.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/14614448211012372

Cites

43 of 43 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There were notable absences in top starter packs, including a general lack of right-leaning politics or news groups, mainstream entertainment media apart from Taylor Swift fans, and other prominent social media topics like beauty, gaming, and food.

    “There were some notable absences, including a general lack of right-leaning politics or news groups, mainstream entertainment media (apart from Taylor Swift fans), and other prominent social media topics like beauty, gaming, and food (Hallinan et al., 2023).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 44 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Hallinan, B., Kim, B., Scharlach, R., Trillò, T., Mizoroki, S., & Shifman, L.
Affiliations
Hebrew University of Jerusalem (IL)
Corresponding author
Kim, Bumsoo
Venue
New Media & Society
Published
2021-05-09
Volume
25
Issue
3
Pages
559-583
ISSN
  • 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
  • 1461-7315
OpenAlex
W3160329409
Cited by
24
References
44
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1
FWCI
1.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
New Media & Society (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
Funders
h2020 european research council (819004)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Networks and Communications › Media and Digital Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Media Studies and Communication
  • Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
Keywords
cross-national comparison, content classification, user preferences, cultural differences, gender differences, age differences, educational differences, morality, cross-national survey

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review