The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Constraining context: Situating datafication in public administration
Abstract
The imaginary of data-driven public administration promises a more effective and knowing public sector. At the same time, corporate practices of datafication are often hidden behind closed doors. Critical algorithm studies, therefore, struggle to access and explore these practices, to produce situated accounts of datafication and possible entry points to reconfigure the emerging data-driven society. This article offers a unique empirical account of the inner workings of data-driven public administration, asking the overall question of how sociotechnical imaginaries of datafication are constrained in the context of public administration. Teams working on datafication in two Norwegian public sector entities have been followed and interviewed over the course of 2 years (2018–2020). While sociotechnical imaginaries thrive in organizational culture and policy discourse alike, the observed data teams struggle to realize data assemblages due to a variety of structural and institutional constraints.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“Indeed, the influence of these platforms on the visibility of public sector communication, combined with the non-transparent management of data and the opacity of associated algorithms, favors processes of datafication and platformization (Helmond, 2015;Reutter, 2022).”
From Exploring the Challenges of Generative AI on Public Sector Communication in Europe (2025) · cites this paper as Reutter, 2022
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Black Box Society: The Secret Algorithms That Control Money and Information
Pasquale, F. (2015) · doi:10.4159/harvard.9780674736061 · Cited by 3,796
Abductive Analysis: Theorizing Qualitative Research
Tavory, I., & Timmermans, S. (2014) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226180458.001.0001 · Cited by 1,726
The Data Revolution: Big Data, Open Data, Data Infrastructures & Their Consequences
Kitchin, R. (2014) · doi:10.4135/9781473909472 · Cited by 1,469 · cited 5×
“Organizations and institutions are key apparatuses of the data assemblage (Kitchin, 2014).”
BackgroundInfluentialThe social power of algorithms
Beer, D. (2017) · Information, Communication & Society · doi:10.1080/1369118x.2016.1216147 · Cited by 945 · cited 3×
“Key policy documents were analyzed: these included the digitalization strategy for the public sector, the Norwegian AI strategy, the concept selection study on sharing of data within the public sector, and mandate letters for the two organizations (2017–2019).”
BackgroundMethodDatatrust: Or, the political quest for numerical evidence and the epistemologies of Big Data
Rieder, G., & Simon, J. (2016) · Big Data & Society · doi:10.1177/2053951716649398 · Cited by 104
Datafied child welfare services: unpacking politics, economics and power
Redden, J., Dencik, L., & Warne, H. (2020) · Policy Studies · doi:10.1080/01442872.2020.1724928 · Cited by 89
Research works printed but not linked: 40
- 10.3389/fdata.2020.00005 · DOI
- 10.1111/padm.12534 · DOI · Paper page
- Bareis J, 2021, Science, Technology & Human Values, 1
- 10.1177/2053951719885967 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2012.678878 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oso/9780190493028.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.4324/9781351247375-18 · doi:10.4324/9781351247375-18
- 10.1525/gp.2020.12912 · DOI
- Dencik L, 2019, Digital Citizenship in a Datafied Society
- 10.14763/2019.2.1413 · DOI
- 10.1080/03637751.2017.1375130 · DOI · Paper page
- Eubanks V, 2018, Automating Inequality: How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor
- 10.1007/s00146-019-00886-y · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444820929319 · DOI
- 10.1007/s11024-009-9124-4 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7208/chicago/9780226276663.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444820929316 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1154087 · DOI · Paper page
- Kitchin R, Lauriault T (2014) Towards critical data studies: charting and unpacking data assemblages and their work. The Programmable City Working Paper 2. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2474112 · DOI
- 10.1177/2053951718821146 · DOI
- 10.1177/0020852316640058 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444820929321 · DOI · Paper page
- Mayer- Schönberger V, 2013, Big Data: A Revolution That Will Transform How We Live, Work and Think
- 10.14763/2019.4.1428 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1111/puar.12625 · DOI · Paper page
- Misuraca g, 2020, Artificial intelligence in public services—overview of the use and impact of AI in public services in the EU
- 10.1177/2053951719833404 · DOI
- O’Neil C, 2016, Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy
- 10.1177/0162243921999715 · DOI
- 10.1177/2053951718809145 · DOI
- 10.1177/2053951717738104 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.3390/info6040836 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2016.1153125 · DOI
- 10.1177/2053951717751552 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/2053951720907107 · DOI
- 10.24908/ss.v12i2.4776 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1080/17508487.2016.1186710 · DOI
- Yeung K (2020) From new public management to new public analytics. ADM Workshop 1: Conceptualizing Automation in the Welfare Sector.
- 10.1177/0162243915608948 · DOI · Paper page
- Zuboff S, 2019, The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for the Future at the New Frontier of Power
Cited by
Exploring the Challenges of Generative AI on Public Sector Communication in Europe
Lovari, A., & De Rosa, F. (2025) · Media and Communication · doi:10.17645/mac.9644 · Cited by 22
Metadata
- Authors
- Reutter, L.
- Affiliations
- Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Norway
- ORCID
- Reutter, Lisa
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-04
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 903-921
- ISSN
- 1461-4448
- 1461-7315
- Cited by
- 42
- References
- 6
- Language
- en
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
