The DOI matches its Crossref record; its reference list is not available.
“Have you learned your lesson?” Communities of practice under algorithmic competition
Abstract
Gig workers are typically thought of as individuals toiling in digitized isolation, not as communities of shared learning. While it’s accurate to say they don’t have the same information-sharing norms as people in traditional employment arrangements, some do gather, in part in digital communities. Online forums, in this space, have become popular sites for gathering, sharing information, and comparing practices. These behaviors provide an opportunity to examine gig workers as emergent communities of practice, and to analyze how work, identity, skills, and workspaces co-constitute each other as sociotechnical environments of work change. In this research, I examine workers’ interactions in an online forum, and focus on how they talk about scams. Analysis reveals that talking about scams is a way for workers to enact belonging in their community of practice. Victims are belittled by other workers, who frame vulnerability, and lack of foresight due to unfamiliarity with the forum itself, as a lack of authenticity. Repudiations are denunciations through which workers assert their belonging. These findings illuminate the practices of what I call “para-organizational” work, with implications for knowledge management in structures of algorithmic competition.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Information deficit could be exploited for scams later, as gig workers lack helpful knowledge to detect discrepancies between actual and fraudulent platform activities.
“The information deficit could be exploited for scams later, as gig workers lack helpful knowledge to detect discrepancies between actual and fraudulent platform activities (Watkins, 2022).”
From Socio‐technical issues in the platform‐mediated gig economy: A systematic literature review: An Annual Review of Information Science and Technology (ARIST) paper (2024) · cites this paper as Watkins, 2022
Citations
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 56 · Cited by 14
Research works printed but not linked: 59
- 10.1108/S0277-283320190000033005 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1108/JKM-11-2016-0504 · DOI
- Baym NK, 1999, Tune In, Log On: Soaps, Fandom, and Online Community
- 10.1177/0170840606071894 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1999.tb02795.x · DOI
- 10.1515/9781400827145 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.7551/mitpress/6352.001.0001 · DOI · Paper page
- Cameron L (2020) Allies or adversaries? Making meaning of work in the “new” gig employment relationship. In: Guclu A (ed.) Proceedings of the Eightieth Annual Meeting of the Academy of Management. Available at: https://journals.aom.org/doi/10.5465/AMBPP.2020.67 · DOI
- 10.1145/3411763.3441331 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444819837736 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/2057047320959850 · DOI
- 10.1177/1206331216660318 · DOI
- 10.1016/j.infoandorg.2008.02.001 · DOI
- Gillespie T, 2018, Custodians of the Internet: Platforms, Content Moderation, and the Hidden Decisions that Shape Social Media
- 10.1145/2818048.2819942 · DOI
- Gray ML, 2019, Ghost work: How to stop Silicon Valley from building a new global underclass
- 10.1145/3351095.3372840 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444817702397 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2020.1713846 · DOI
- 10.1027/1864-1105/a000062 · DOI
- 10.1145/2470654.2470742 · DOI · Paper page
- Jackson S, 2014, Essays on Communication, Materiality, and Society
- 10.1007/978-3-030-15742-5_55 · DOI
- 10.1145/3415198 · DOI
- Johnston H, 2018, Organizing on-demand: representation, voice, and collective bargaining in the gig economy
- Klawitter E, 2018, International Journal of Communication, 12, 3490
- Kunda G, 2009, Engineering Culture: Control and Commitment in a High-tech Corporation
- 10.1057/978-1-137-48087-3_4 · DOI
- Mateescu A, 2019, Data & Society, 8, 1030332
- Matias JN (2016) The civic labor of online moderators. In: Internet Politics and Policy Conference. Oxford. Available at: https://blogs.oii.ox.ac.uk/ipp-conference/sites/ipp/files/documents/JNM-The_Civic_Labor_of_Online_Moderators__Internet_Politics_Policy_.pdf
- 10.1177/0891241613485431 · DOI
- 10.1177/0196859917706158 · DOI
- 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190067397.013.17 · DOI
- 10.7551/mitpress/9780262017480.001.0001 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2000.tb00761.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1145/3375627.3375816 · DOI
- 10.1145/2976749.2978307 · DOI
- 10.1525/9780520970632 · DOI · Paper page
- Rosenblat A, 2016, International Journal of Communication, 10, 27
- Rosenblat A, Kneese T, Boyd D (2014) Workplace surveillance: open society foundations’ future of work commissioned research papers. Available at: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2536605 · DOI
- 10.1080/1369118X.2019.1612933 · DOI
- 10.1146/annurev.soc.30.012703.110644 · DOI
- 10.1177/1461444818821316 · DOI
- 10.1145/3287560.3287598 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444809360400 · DOI
- Stark D, 2021, Sociologica, 14, 47
- 10.1017/CBO9781139174077.003 · DOI
- Suchman L, 2007, Human-machine Reconfigurations: Plans and Situated Actions
- 10.1023/A:1008651105359 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1177/1461444818773727 · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1093/oso/9780198861669.003.0008 · DOI
- Vertesi J, 2020, Shaping Science: Organizations, Decisions, and Culture on NASA’s Teams
- 10.1145/3406865.3418383 · DOI
- 10.2307/2392370 · DOI
- 10.1177/1095796016661511 · DOI · Paper page
- Winner L, 1980, Daedalus, 109, 121
- 10.1111/ntwe.12112 · DOI
- Yao Z, 2021, Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 5, 1
- 10.1145/2872427.2883036 · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Watkins, E. A.
- Affiliations
- Princeton University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Watkins, Elizabeth Anne
- Venue
- New Media & Society
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2022-07
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 1567-1590
- ISSN
- 1461-4448 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7315
- OpenAlex
- W4284975068
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 56
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2
- FWCI
- 3.60
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- New Media & Society (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Columbia Institute for Social and Economic Research and Policy
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Digital Economy and Work Transformation
- Social Sciences › Education › Innovative Education and Learning Practices
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Industrial relations › Legal and Labor Studies
- Keywords
- gig work, communities of practice, algorithmic competition, online forums, scams, sense of belonging, vulnerability, authenticity, denunciation, knowledge management, socio-technical environments, occupational identity, information sharing
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review